SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Kang Hwee Gee J:

[1] This is an application by the plaintiff for a Fortuna injunction to restrain the defendant from filing a winding-up petition under s. 218(1)(e) of the Companies Act 1965 upon the service of the statutory notice.

[2] An ex parte order had been granted on 29 January 2008 against the defendant on an urgent basis and today's hearing is inter partes.

[3] The grounds are as follows: (verbatim submission by counsel for the plaintiff)

(i) The plaintiff is not a creditor as defined by s. 217(1) of the Companies Act 1965. Section 217(1) reads as follows:

217. Application of winding up.

(1) A company (whether or not it is being wound up voluntarily) may be wound up under an order of the Court on the petition of:

(a) the company;

(b) any creditor, including a contingent or prospective creditor, of the company;

(c) a contributory or any person who is the personal representative of a deceased contributory or the trustee in bankruptcy or the Official Assignee of the estate of a bankrupt contributory;

(d) the liquidator;

(e) the Minister pursuant to section 205 or on the ground specified in section 218(1)(d);

(f) in the case of a company which is a licensed institutio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top