SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak JCA:

Introduction

[1] There were two enclosures for our consideration. The first one was encl. 25a which was a notice of motion filed by the respondent (Tun Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad). The second was encl. 29a which was also a notice of motion filed by the appellant (Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim). We heard these two enclosures simultaneously.

[2] The notice of motion in encl. 25a sought to move this court for the following orders pursuant to art. 152 of the Federal Constitution and/or s. 8 of the National Language Acts 1963/1967 (Act 32) and/or s. 3 of the Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967 (Act 388) and/or r. 101 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994 and/or pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of this court:

1. The appellant's record of appeal filed in the appellant's appeal herein be struck out and/or set aside.

2. Consequently, the appellant's appeal herein be dismissed with costs.

3. The costs of this application shall be borne by the appellant.

[3] While the notice of motion in encl. 29a sought for the following prayers:

1. That the applicant appellant be allowed to file this application out of time.

2. That the applicant appellant be allo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top