JUDGMENT
Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:
[1] This is my judgment in respect of the plaintiffs' action premised on copyright, against the defendant, who is the distributor of the infringed product, complained of.
Brief Facts
[2] The plaintiffs say (i) the 1st plaintiff is the owner of copyright subsisting in original drawing for water meter known as Kent PSM and its predecessor the Kent Water Meter; (ii) the 2nd plaintiff is the licensee of the copyright in the drawing and the plaintiffs' water meter in Malaysia; (iii) Ningbo Water Meter Co. Ltd (Ningbo) has infringed by reproducing in material form the drawings and the plaintiffs' water meter; (iv) the defendant has infringed by selling the infringed water meter.
[3] The defendant says (i) there is no evidence to prove the drawings and subsequent drawings with minor amendments to have sufficient originality to enjoy copyright protection; (ii) the statutory declaration of plaintiff to invoke copyright must fail as the drawings were not annexed and only subsequent drawings were annexed; (iii) no substantial reproduction of the drawings; (iv) any similarities between the plaintiffs' and the defendant's water meter simply follow from t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.