SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the plaintiffs' action premised on copyright, against the defendant, who is the distributor of the infringed product, complained of.

Brief Facts

[2] The plaintiffs say (i) the 1st plaintiff is the owner of copyright subsisting in original drawing for water meter known as Kent PSM and its predecessor the Kent Water Meter; (ii) the 2nd plaintiff is the licensee of the copyright in the drawing and the plaintiffs' water meter in Malaysia; (iii) Ningbo Water Meter Co. Ltd (Ningbo) has infringed by reproducing in material form the drawings and the plaintiffs' water meter; (iv) the defendant has infringed by selling the infringed water meter.

[3] The defendant says (i) there is no evidence to prove the drawings and subsequent drawings with minor amendments to have sufficient originality to enjoy copyright protection; (ii) the statutory declaration of plaintiff to invoke copyright must fail as the drawings were not annexed and only subsequent drawings were annexed; (iii) no substantial reproduction of the drawings; (iv) any similarities between the plaintiffs' and the defendant's water meter simply follow from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top