SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Aziah Ali J:

(1) The Attorney General raised objections to the applicants application for judicial review under O. 53 of the Rules of the High Court 1980 ("the RHC") made by way of originating motion seeking the following reliefs (encl. 1):

(1) an order to set aside or quash the decision of the 1st respondent made vide its letter Bil. TRK(K)2-2010 dated 20 July 2010; and

(2) an order to quash the decision of the 2nd respondent made vide its letter KEHE (44) 685/10 Klt (66) dated 12 July 2010, received by the applicant on 19 July 2010;

(3) an order that all further proceedings which relate to the second respondents decision to be stayed until final disposal by this Honourable Court;

(4) costs of the application and incidental costs to be paid by the respondents;

(5) such further or other reliefs that this court deems fit.

(2) The relief sought for in prayer (1) is in respect of the decision of the Tribunal, the 1st respondent, made on 20 July 2010 allowing a preliminary objection raised by the 2nd respondent based on the provisions of reg. 4(1) of the Customs (Appeal Tribunal) Regulations 2007 (PU(A) 210/2007) which states as follows:

Payment of duties or taxes pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top