Back
Solar Inverter Nightmare Ends in Victory: Consumer Court Slams Polycab with Refund Order
In a clear win for consumer rights, the , ruled against Polycab India Private Limited and Libra Industries for . The bench, comprising Shri V. Ramachandran (Presiding Member) and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N (Member), ordered a full refund of Rs 84,450 for a defective solar inverter, plus compensation, after the companies failed to honor a five-year warranty. The , decision underscores the perils of shirking warranty promises in India's booming solar market.
From Green Energy Hopes to Power Bills Pile-Up
Saju P. Joseph, proprietor of M/s Mama Marketing Agencies in Ernakulam, Kerala, invested in sustainability by installing solar panels at his office-cum-residence to cut skyrocketing electricity costs. On , he purchased a Polycab Solar String Inverter (10KW) from Libra Industries—manufactured by Polycab—for Rs 84,450 (part of a Rs 1,18,708 invoice covering accessories). Sold with glowing promises of efficiency and a five-year manufacturer's warranty , the device seemed like a smart buy.
Trouble struck on , when the inverter failed. A technician confirmed the defect and replaced it the next day with another unit (Serial No. 1547A219B120067). But Joseph soon discovered a twist: the "new" replacement was an older 2019 model, predating his original 2021 unit. Worse, on , this inverter also broke down. Despite technician confirmation of the fault, Polycab refused replacement, blaming issues—a claim Joseph contested.
Stranded without solar power, Joseph faced mounting KSEB bills, including Rs 7,515 for . His emails pleading for a defect-free replacement or refund went unanswered, prompting the , complaint under consumer protection laws for and .
Complainant's Case Stands Unchallenged as OPs Go AWOL
Joseph argued that Polycab's product fell short of basic durability expectations, especially after two failures within warranty. He highlighted the shady replacement with an obsolete model as proof of unfair practices, supported by the invoice (Exbt. A1), warranty card (Exbt. A3), emails (Exbt. A2), and his KSEB bill (Exbt. A4). The core questions: Did repeated defects and refusal to fix constitute deficiency? Was he entitled to refund and damages for agony and extra costs?
The , served notice, never appeared or filed a version—leading to an hearing. As noted in external reports, Polycab vaguely cited another of Joseph's inverters (bought in 2021) working fine, but dodged accountability. Their silence, the court observed, reflected "laxity" and reluctance, sealing their fate.
Warranty Woes: Court's Razor-Sharp Reasoning
No precedents were cited, but the Commission leaned on bedrock consumer protection principles: sellers must honor warranties for defects arising in the period, without excuses. It dissected the timeline—first failure at ~7 months, second at ~17 months post-replacement (well within five years)—and slammed the older-model swap as evidence of substandard service.
The bench rejected any KSEB blame game, emphasizing Joseph's reasonable reliance on Polycab's "technologically advanced" hype. Non-use of solar panels caused direct financial hardship, turning eco-savings into losses. External summaries reinforce this: the OPs
"failed to honour their obligations under the warranty,"
committing "gross deficiency."
Key Observations from the Bench
"The have committed a and by failing to replace the defective invertor as per the warranty."
"The complainant had purchased the invertor with a reasonable expectation of its durability and functionality, but the have failed to fulfil their duties and assurances."
"The had not turned up to file their version in time. This shows their laxity in responding to a very serious complaint... resulting in the attitude of ."
"The defects occurred in the inverter of the solar panel is within the warranty period."
Justice Delivered: Refund, Relief, and a Warning Shot
The Commission unequivocally ruled for Joseph:
"1) The shall refund an amount of Rs.84,450/- ... to the complainant. 2) The shall pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- ... as compensation ... 3) The shall also pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- ... towards the cost of the proceedings..."
Payable within 45 days, or else 7.25% interest kicks in on refund and compensation.
This ruling signals to manufacturers like Polycab: ignore warranty claims at your peril, especially when . For consumers, it's empowerment—defective green tech won't dim your rights. Solar adopters eyeing brands can now cite this as a benchmark for accountability amid India's renewable push.
