Case Law
Subject : Legal News - Recruitment Law
Jodhpur: In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court has intervened to correct an alleged error in the physical standard test (PST) for a Constable recruitment, declaring a candidate successful based on a fresh measurement by a Medical Board constituted by AIIMS, Jodhpur. The court also awarded costs of ₹1 lakh to the petitioner, citing mental agony and litigation costs caused by the incorrect measurement and subsequent illegal ousting from the process.
Presiding over the case, Justice Ganesh Ram Meena heard the plea of a petitioner who was declared 'fail' in the PST conducted on December 27, 2023, on the ground that her height was less than the requisite 152 cm for women candidates.
Background of the Case
According to the petitioner's counsel, this declaration was contrary to previous recruitment processes where the petitioner's height was recorded as 152.1 cm in 2021 and 152 cm in 2022, clearing the PST on both occasions. The petitioner contended that the measurement taken during the 2023 recruitment was incorrect.
The respondents, the recruiting authority, did not appear in court despite receiving notices. The court proceeded to decide the matter based on the material available on record and the petitioner's submissions.
Court-Ordered Verification
Given the discrepancy, the High Court, through an interim order dated January 8, 2024, directed the Superintendent of AIIMS, Jodhpur, to constitute a Medical Board to measure the petitioner's height afresh. The petitioner was required to appear before the board and provide an undertaking that she would bear a cost of ₹25,000 if her height was found to be less than 152 cm. The petitioner, confident in her actual height, provided the undertaking.
The Medical Board at AIIMS, Jodhpur, subsequently submitted its report to the court. As per the report, the petitioner's height was measured at 152.3 cm.
Court's Findings and Decision
Considering the consistent measurements from previous recruitments (152.1 cm in 2021 and 152 cm in 2022) and the definitive measurement of 152.3 cm by the AIIMS Medical Board, the court concluded that the petitioner's height was indeed above the prescribed 152 cm.
Justice Meena observed, "In view of these facts, this Court can safely held that the petitioners height is above 152 Cm and the respondents have incorrectly measured her height during the Physical Standard Test conducted on 27.12.2023 and she was illegally declared as failed in the Physical Standard Test."
The court declared the petitioner successful in the PST and directed the respondents to consider her candidature accordingly, allowing her to participate in the further recruitment process.
Award of Costs
Highlighting the incorrect measurement by the respondents and the petitioner's need to undertake litigation, including taking the risk of paying ₹25,000 for the independent medical measurement, the court deemed it just and proper to award costs to the petitioner.
The judgment stated, "This Court in such circumstances deems just and proper to allow the cost of Rs. 1,00,000 to the petitioner to be paid by the respondents for incorrectly measuring her height and because of which she has suffered a great mental agony and litigation cost." The respondents have been directed to pay the amount by demand draft within one month.
The writ petition was accordingly allowed, ensuring the petitioner receives due consideration in the recruitment process after being erroneously disqualified on the basis of an incorrect height measurement.
#RecruitmentLaw #HeightMeasurement #CourtOrder #RajasthanHighCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.