Case Law
Subject : Criminal Law - Investigation and Procedure
Kolkata: The Calcutta High Court has directed the West Bengal Police to conduct a further investigation into the death of a minor girl, citing significant lapses in the initial probe. A division bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi observed that the police had failed to adequately investigate serious allegations of sexual assault and blackmail that emerged from a statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.).
The order came in an appeal filed by the victim's father, Tapas Kumar Goswami, a police personnel posted in Punjab. The appeal challenged a single-judge order dated July 22, 2025, concerning the investigation into his daughter's death by hanging while she was living with her paternal grandparents.
The appellant, Tapas Kumar Goswami, challenged the quality of the police investigation into his daughter's death. The police had initially investigated the case under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (abetment of suicide) but submitted a report stating the probe yielded no "fruitful result" to prosecute any individual.
However, the appellant contended that crucial evidence pointing towards a more sinister crime had been overlooked.
The appellant's counsel argued that statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. from both the appellant and his wife clearly indicated that the victim had been subjected to penetrative sexual assault. It was further alleged that the perpetrators had filmed the act and were using the video to blackmail the young girl. The counsel strongly criticized the police for not pursuing these lines of investigation.
The submission highlighted specific failures, including the police's neglect to seize and examine the mobile devices of the persons named in the Section 164 statement, which could contain critical evidence of the alleged video and blackmail. The appellant also suggested that CCTV footage from the vicinity of where the post-mortem was conducted could reveal important information.
Representing the State, the learned advocate confirmed that the investigation was conducted under Section 306 IPC and that the police had filed a final report after finding insufficient evidence for a trial.
After perusing the case diary, the division bench found merit in the appellant's submissions. The court noted the presence of the wife's statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., which contained grave allegations of sexual assault and blackmail by named individuals.
"It does not appear from the case diary that the police investigated such line adequately. Police did not seize the mobile devices of the persons named in such statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code," the Bench observed.
Finding the investigation unsatisfactory, the court issued a clear directive for a deeper probe.
"In such circumstances, police will investigate the case. Police will add relevant provisions of the BNS on the basis of the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. of the appellant and his wife as also the other materials in the case diary," the judgment stated.
The Court also directed the investigating authority to consider the appellant's submissions regarding the examination of CCTV footage and mobile devices during the further investigation.
While ordering a fresh investigation, the bench refrained from commenting on the substitution of the investigating officer or agency at this stage, leaving the point open for the single-judge bench to decide as the writ petition is still pending. The court requested the learned Single Judge to hear the main writ petition on the scheduled date.
The appeal (M.A.T. 1393 of 2025) was disposed of with these directions, paving the way for a more thorough inquiry into the tragic death of the minor.
#CalcuttaHighCourt #CriminalLaw #PoliceInvestigation
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.