Back
India's Higher Judiciary: Persistent Gender Imbalance Persists at 14.85%
In a stark revelation underscoring ongoing challenges in judicial diversity, data from the indicates that women judges constitute just 14.85% of the total working strength across India's 25 , with only 116 women out of 781 sitting judges as of . The leads with an impressive 18 women judges, accounting for 29.51% of its 61-judge bench, while Delhi and Madras follow with 10 each (22.73% and 18.87%, respectively). At the other extreme, like Manipur, Tripura, and Uttarakhand report zero women judges, and giants like Allahabad (6.36%) and Madhya Pradesh (2.38%) lag far behind. The fares even worse, with solitary woman Justice B.V. Nagarathna amid 33 judges. On , Chief Justice of India Surya Kant urged concrete measures to boost representation, contrasting the higher judiciary's gloom with the ' encouraging 37% women judges.
This data not only highlights numerical disparities but raises profound questions about equity in the -driven appointment process, the pipeline from lower courts, and the broader implications for impartial justice delivery.
Breakdown: Leaders, Laggards, and the Middle Pack
The stands out as the frontrunner, boasting 18 women judges out of 61—a percentage of 29.51% that reflects proactive elevation policies or a robust pool of eligible women advocates and district judges. Close contenders include Telangana (7 out of 28, 25%), Delhi (10/44, 22.73%), Gujarat (7/35, 20%), Gauhati (5/25, 20%), and Karnataka (9/46, 19.57%). Smaller courts like Sikkim (1/3, 33.33%) and Meghalaya (1/4, 25%) punch above their weight in percentages, though absolute numbers remain low.
Conversely, the picture darkens in several jurisdictions. , the nation's largest with 110 judges, has merely 7 women (6.36%), a disproportionately low figure given its scale and the volume of district-level talent available. Madhya Pradesh trails with 1 out of 42 (2.38%), while Chhattisgarh (1/15, 6.67%), Jharkhand (1/14, 7.14%), Kerala (3/40, 7.5%), Orissa (1/19, 5.26%), and Patna (2/38, 5.26%) hover in single digits. The absolute zeros in Manipur (0/3), Tripura (0/4), and Uttarakhand (0/10) signal acute regional bottlenecks.
For clarity, here's a comprehensive table of the data:
| High Court | Working Strength | Women Judges | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allahabad | 110 | 7 | 6.36% |
| Andhra Pradesh | 32 | 5 | 15.63% |
| Bombay | 80 | 12 | 15% |
| Calcutta | 43 | 8 | 18.60% |
| Chhattisgarh | 15 | 1 | 6.67% |
| Delhi | 44 | 10 | 22.73% |
| Gauhati | 25 | 5 | 20% |
| Gujarat | 35 | 7 | 20% |
| Himachal Pradesh | 12 | 1 | 8.33% |
| Jammu & Kashmir/Ladakh | 14 | 2 | 14.29% |
| Jharkhand | 14 | 1 | 7.14% |
| Karnataka | 46 | 9 | 19.57% |
| Kerala | 40 | 3 | 7.5% |
| Madhya Pradesh | 42 | 1 | 2.38% |
| Madras | 53 | 10 | 18.87% |
| Manipur | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Meghalaya | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| Orissa | 19 | 1 | 5.26% |
| Patna | 38 | 2 | 5.26% |
| Punjab & Haryana | 61 | 18 | 29.51% |
| Rajasthan | 39 | 4 | 10.26% |
| Sikkim | 3 | 1 | 33.33% |
| Telangana | 28 | 7 | 25% |
| Tripura | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| Uttarakhand | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 781 | 116 | 14.85% |
This granular view reveals not just averages but systemic variances, likely influenced by state-specific Bar demographics, compositions, and historical appointment trends.
: A Solitary Figure Amidst Decline
The apex court's representation is even more dismal.
"The
currently has only one woman judge, Justice B.V. Nagarathna, out of its present working strength of 33 judges,"
the data notes. No elevations since
, when Justices Hima Kohli, Bela Trivedi, and B.V. Nagarathna joined, pushing the count to a historic high of four. Retirements have since dwindled it to one, underscoring the fragility of progress without sustained momentum.
CJI's Call to Action on
Adding urgency, Chief Justice Surya Kant, speaking on
, stated:
"Today, on the occasion of
, the Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, called for measures to increase the representation of women on the bench. While the picture in the higher judiciary may not be positive, the representation of women in the
is quite encouraging. The CJI stated today that women judges account for nearly 37% in the
."
This contrast—37% at district level versus 14.85% in
—points to a "leaky pipeline," where women advance robustly initially but face barriers in elevations.
Historical Context and the System
Historically, women's entry into the higher judiciary has been gradual. The first woman judge, Justice Fathima Beevi, was appointed in . Peaks like 2021's four women were exceptions, not norms. Appointments rest with the ( ), recommending from High Court judges and senior advocates under . Critics argue seniority norms and male-dominated collegiums perpetuate imbalances, despite no constitutional bar to diversity considerations.
Legal Implications: Diversity as a Constitutional Imperative
From a legal standpoint, low gender diversity implicates 's equality guarantee and the 's emphasis on an independent, representative judiciary. Diverse benches enhance legitimacy in gender-sensitive litigation—family disputes, cases, workplace harassment—by bringing varied perspectives, reducing unconscious biases. Empirical studies (e.g., global data from US courts) show women judges influence outcomes in rape and domestic violence matters. In India, this underrepresentation risks eroding public confidence, especially post-#MeToo and amid data on rising gender crimes.
Moreover, it challenges the 's opacity. Post- (struck down in ), calls for transparency in diversity metrics grow, potentially inviting demanding affirmative recommendations.
Barriers to Women's Elevation
Key hurdles include:
(1) Fewer women in senior Bar roles due to work-life imbalances;
(2) preferences for "seniority-cum-merit" favoring longer tenures often held by men;
(3) Regional disparities in legal education/enrollment;
(4) Post-elevation retention issues like transfers. District-level 37% success suggests the issue lies in High Court-to-SC/ sustained HC presence.
Pathways Forward: Reforms and Broader Impacts
Reforms could include: diversity targets in MoPs, fast-tracking women district judges, incentives for women litigators, and data-driven monitoring. Globally, Canada's merit-with-diversity model or UK's targets offer blueprints. Impacts on practice: Balanced benches could reshape precedents in constitutional law, arbitration (women-led firms rising), and commercial disputes. For lawyers, it signals mentoring women juniors for elevations.
The legal community must advocate—through amicus briefs, seminars—for parity, ensuring the judiciary mirrors India's 48% female population.
Conclusion
With 14.85% in
and one in the
, India's higher judiciary's gender profile demands urgent reform. As CJI Surya Kant implored,
"According to data released by the
on
, there are 116 women judges out of a total working strength of 781 judges across the
, accounting for roughly 14.85% of the sitting High Court judges."
Bridging the district-to-high court gap will fortify justice's foundations, fostering a truly representative Bench.
