Back
Bar Leaders Unite Against ' Saturday Sittings Proposal
In a resounding show of solidarity, bar leaders from across India have voiced fierce opposition to a controversial proposal for to hold regular sittings on Saturdays. Citing already grueling workloads, the essential role of weekends for critical non-court tasks, and the myth of judicial "vacations," advocates warn that such a move would exacerbate burnout, lead to more adjournments in lower forums, and ultimately degrade the quality of justice delivery. As India's judiciary grapples with over 50 million pending cases, this push for extended hours risks prioritizing quantity over sustainable efficacy, according to senior and young bar members alike.
The Spark of Controversy: Understanding the Proposal
The idea of functioning on Saturdays stems from ongoing efforts to tackle , a chronic issue plaguing India's court system. typically observe vacations for 10-12 weeks annually, during which limited benches handle urgent matters. However, proposals for routine Saturday sessions—potentially mirroring past experimental pilots—have resurfaced amid pressure from the and government to accelerate case disposal.
Bar councils and associations, representing lakhs of lawyers, have mobilized against it.
"The Bar is really disturbed with the proposal. They are all feeling extra pressure at this point of time,"
one leader noted, highlighting even government counsel's discontent. This isn't mere resistance to change; it's a critique rooted in the ground realities of legal practice, where
"vacation is not really a vacation; lawyers still go to offices."
Historically, similar initiatives, like the Saturday e-filing drives or ad-hoc vacation benches, faced backlash for overburdening an already stretched ecosystem. With the reporting averaging 60-100 matters per bench daily, the question arises: Will squeezing more hours yield better outcomes, or merely perpetuate exhaustion?
Voices from the Bar: A Chorus of Concern
Bar presidents and leaders from Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and beyond have weighed in, painting a picture of a profession under siege.
"I don't think this is a step in the right direction,"
asserted one senior advocate, emphasizing the universal dismay. Young bar members, often the backbone of litigation, echoed this:
"Young lawyers have to draft their plaint, written statements, petition on Saturdays."
Seniors handling arbitration and tribunal work added that transforming Saturdays into court days would cascade disruptions.
"The young Bar members and seniors take up arbitration, tribunal and
work on Saturdays. They will be unable to take up this work if Saturdays are made working. The direct result is that we will look at adjournments."
This unified stance underscores a rare consensus in a fractious bar community, signaling the proposal's potential to alienate even allies in the justice delivery chain.
Unmasking the Workload Reality
Contrary to public perception, the legal profession doesn't clock off on weekends or vacations.
"While everyone thinks there is a holiday on Saturday and we are enjoying life, judges and lawyers are working,"
a bar leader remarked pointedly. Judges routinely extend beyond court hours:
"Judges sit in court till 5 PM. The lawyers have to go back and prepare for the next day."
Post-hearing, justices face a Sisyphean task—correcting, signing, and uploading 60-100 orders daily, often until 8 PM or later.
"I do not know any judge who goes back before 8 PM. You have 60-100 matters listed before any court everyday. The orders have to be corrected and signed, then uploaded. It is not easy reading and correcting."
For lawyers, Saturdays are sacred for preparatory work. Drafting plaints, written statements, and petitions demands uninterrupted focus—time stolen by court sittings. Government offices, by contrast, remain closed, creating logistical hurdles for counsel coordinating with state machinery.
"Government offices also don't work on Saturdays. I don't know why lawyers are made to work on Saturdays."
Saturdays: The Lifeline for Alternative Legal Work
One cannot overstate Saturdays' role in sustaining a multi-tiered legal practice. Arbitration sittings,
hearings, district/trial court appearances, and mediation sessions dominate weekends, generating vital revenue—especially for young advocates. Forcing HC duties would trigger a domino effect:
"The direct result is that we will look at adjournments,"
predict leaders.
, already backlogged, would suffer delays, compounding pendency.
Young lawyers, juggling survival with skill-building, stand to lose most. Without Saturday drafting slots, filings slow, briefs weaken, and professional growth stalls.
"You are only increasing the pressure,"
lamented one voice, capturing the sentiment.
Judicial Perspective: vs. Routine Overload
While part-heard urgent matters might justify exceptional Saturday benches, regularizing them draws ire.
"One can understand if it is a part-heard matter, but to make it a regular working day, I am sorry, is not the answer."
Judges' post-court marathons already strain resources; adding full Saturdays risks errors in high-stakes decisions, from
to
.
Legal Analysis: Balancing Efficiency with Sustainability
From a doctrinal lens, this proposal intersects 's right to life and personal liberty, increasingly interpreted to encompass work-life balance (e.g., Justice K.S. Puttaswamy privacy extensions). under demands viable working conditions, not burnout-inducing schedules. Globally, courts like the US federal system or UK's prioritize efficiency through tech (e-Courts, AI triage) over mere hours.
Critically, evidence from India's e-Courts Phase III rollout shows virtual hearings reduce physical strain more effectively than extended physical sittings. The 's own NJDG data reveals pendency roots in vacancies (30%+ judicial posts unfilled) and infrastructure gaps, not weekend idleness. Mandating Saturdays sidesteps structural reforms, potentially violating by executive-judicial overreach.
Moreover, declining judgment quality—
"Due to this, the quality of judgments will go down"
—threatens appellate integrity. Rushed dictations invite scrutiny under
uniformity mandates.
Broader Impacts on Legal Practice and Justice System
The ripple effects are profound. Young bar attrition could spike, deterring talent from litigation amid corporate allure. Seniors might scale back , straining access to justice. Government counsel's unhappiness signals policy misalignments, delaying state litigations.
Systemically, more adjournments inflate costs—estimated at ₹1.5 lakh crore annually from delays ( report). Ironically, the cure could worsen the disease, perpetuating a vicious cycle where exhausted professionals deliver subpar justice.
Calls for Reconsideration and Viable Alternatives
Bar leaders implore reconsideration:
"I hope this will be done away with."
Alternatives abound: Appointing 5,000+ judges (per
), expanding para-legals, AI for case management, and 24/7 virtual counters for urgents. Summer bar exams or skill workshops could repurpose vacations productively without court mandates.
Stakeholders urge dialogue via and collegium consultations, prioritizing holistic reforms over quick fixes.
Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment for Judicial Wellness
As bar voices crescendo, the Saturday sittings proposal tests India's commitment to a resilient judiciary. Dismissing lawyers' lived realities risks not just professional morale but the Constitution's justice pillar. Policymakers must heed: True reform empowers, it doesn't exhaust. With unified bar opposition, the momentum favors sense over saturation—ensuring weekends remain for recharging, not relentless hearings.
