Indian Courts Bolster IP and Insolvency Regimes in Rulings on Trademark Protection and Corporate Rescue

In two significant but separate orders, Indian judicial bodies have delivered decisive rulings that reinforce the legal frameworks governing intellectual property rights and corporate insolvency. The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction protecting the iconic Beverly Hills Polo Club logo from infringement by a hospitality entity, while the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Mumbai approved a resolution plan for a debt-laden pharmaceutical company, underscoring the primacy of the commercial wisdom of creditors. These decisions provide crucial clarity for legal practitioners navigating the complexities of brand protection and corporate restructuring in India.

---

Delhi High Court Upholds Sanctity of Device Marks in Beverly Hills Polo Club Injunction

Case: Lifestyle Equities C.V. & Anr v. Hari Shankar Bilwal (CS(COMM) 1218/2025)
Coram: Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

In a robust affirmation of trademark rights, the Delhi High Court has restrained a Jaipur-based hotel, "Polo Inn & Suites," from using any mark featuring a polo player device found to be deceptively similar to the globally recognized logo of the Beverly Hills Polo Club (BHPC). The ex-parte ad-interim injunction, issued on November 13, serves as a critical precedent on the protection of distinctive device marks, especially when used in conjunction with generic or descriptive words.

The suit was initiated by Lifestyle Equities, the proprietor of the BHPC trademarks, which has cultivated a global brand presence since 1982 and holds registrations in India dating back to 1992. The plaintiff argued that the hotel's prominent use of a logo featuring a polo player on its signage, website, and third-party booking platforms created a significant risk of consumer confusion and diluted the distinctiveness of its well-established brand.

The Court's Analysis: Likelihood of Confusion and Brand Reputation

Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora's order hinged on a prima facie analysis of three core tenets for granting interim relief: the existence of a prima facie case, the balance of convenience, and the potential for irreparable harm.

The court found that Lifestyle Equities had successfully established a strong prima facie case. It acknowledged that the BHPC marks command a “formidable reputation and goodwill” . A direct comparison revealed that the hotel’s logo prominently featured a "polo player on horseback," which the court identified as the “striking and distinctive feature” of BHPC's registered trademark.

Crucially, the court dissected the composite nature of the infringing mark. It observed that while the word "Polo" is somewhat descriptive of the sport, its combination with a visual representation of a polo player significantly heightens the probability of consumer association with the BHPC brand. The order stated, "The combination of the word 'Polo' with a polo player device... further increased the likelihood of confusion." This reasoning is vital for brand owners who use common words as part of a larger, distinctive brand identity.

Lifestyle Equities also submitted evidence of negative online reviews for the hotel, arguing that such feedback could unjustifiably tarnish its own brand's reputation due to mistaken association. This argument underscored the real-world commercial damage that can result from trademark infringement beyond mere loss of sales.

A Nuanced Injunction: Balancing Rights

In a carefully calibrated order, the court distinguished between the word mark and the device mark. While it completely prohibited the use of the infringing polo player logo or any deceptively similar device, it permitted the hotel to continue its business under the names “Polo Inn & Suites” and “Polo Lounge.” The order explicitly clarified that this permission was conditional: "as long as these do not include any polo player device."

This distinction provides an important takeaway for practitioners: courts are willing to craft specific, targeted injunctions that prevent infringement without unnecessarily crippling a defendant’s entire business operation, particularly where parts of the business name may be considered generic or descriptive when used in isolation.

The hotel and its affiliates have been directed to remove the infringing marks from all physical and digital assets, including social media and e-commerce listings. The injunction is set to remain in force until February 2, 2026, when the matter is next scheduled for hearing.

---

NCLT Sanctions Resolution Plan for Sterling Healthcare, Reaffirming CoC's Commercial Wisdom

Case: L&T Finance Limited v. Sterling Healthcare Limited (CP(IB) No. 370 of 2023)
Coram: Judicial Member Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey and Technical Member Prabhat Kumar

In the parallel domain of corporate law, the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved a Rs 12.8 crore resolution plan for Sterling Healthcare Limited, a pharmaceutical manufacturer that had entered the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The order, delivered on November 13, 2025, highlights the efficiency of the IBC framework in achieving value maximization and balancing the interests of diverse creditors.

The CIRP was initiated in December 2023 by L&T Finance after Sterling Healthcare defaulted on a debt exceeding Rs 19 crore. The total admitted claims against the company stood at Rs 19.56 crore.

The Resolution Process and the Swiss Challenge Method

The resolution process, managed by Resolution Professional Dhiren Shah, involved the valuation of the company, which was pegged at a fair value of Rs 15.96 crore and a liquidation value of Rs 9.85 crore. The approved resolution plan, submitted by Kanak S. Kewalramani (a whole-time director of Knowledge Marine & Engineering Works Limited), not only surpassed the liquidation value but also provided a significant recovery for creditors.

Notably, the plan was selected through a 'Swiss Challenge' process, a bidding method designed to elicit the best possible offer. This demonstrates the flexibility and commercial pragmatism embedded within the CIRP framework, allowing the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to adopt innovative mechanisms to maximize asset value. The CoC, representing the collective financial creditors, approved the plan with a unanimous 100 percent vote, showcasing complete confidence in its viability.

NCLT's Scrutiny and Adherence to IBC Mandates

Before granting its approval, the NCLT bench meticulously examined whether the resolution plan complied with the statutory requirements laid out in the IBC, particularly Section 30(2) and associated CIRP Regulations. The Resolution Professional confirmed that the plan adhered to all legal mandates.

The tribunal's order emphasized key aspects of the plan's compliance: - Fair Treatment of Creditors: The plan provides for a 65.12% repayment of total admitted claims. It ensures 100% payment to workmen and employees, adhering to the priority waterfall, and offers a substantial 74.93% recovery to secured financial creditors. - Statutory Compliance: The plan was found to be in line with Regulations 37, 38, and 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations and did not contravene the eligibility criteria for resolution applicants under Section 29A of the Code.

In its concluding remarks, the NCLT stated: "In view of the discussions and the law thus settled, the instant Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code... The Resolution Plan is not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and is in accordance with law. The same needs to be approved."

With the tribunal's sanction, the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC has been lifted, and the approved plan is now legally binding on all stakeholders, including the corporate debtor, its employees, creditors, and government authorities. This outcome not only provides a path to revival for Sterling Healthcare but also reinforces the IBC’s core objective of resolving corporate distress in a time-bound and effective manner, prioritizing the collective commercial wisdom of the CoC.