Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Non-printing of barcode in supply packages but supply made: The primary concern is whether breach of contract, such as non-printing of barcodes, can be addressed after the contract expiry. Several cases indicate that breaches occurring within the contractual period can lead to remedies even after expiry, provided the breach is established and damages are quantifiable ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"], ["TISARA PACKAGING INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL"].
Breach and contractual obligations: Many sources highlight that non-compliance with contractual terms—such as delayed or non-supply, or failure to print barcodes—is considered a breach. For example, the entire supply of diaries should be made within 15 days and non-supply of report of inquiry officer is in breach of natural justice ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"], ["Vivid OffThe State of Biharset through its partner Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh M/s Vivid Offset Press vs State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna - Patna"]. Breaches are actionable whether or not the contract is still valid, especially if damages can be proved.
Remedies post-contract expiry: Courts have held that damages for breach can be claimed after expiry if the breach is established and damages are quantifiable. For instance, revenue recovery proceedings can be initiated for damages arising out of breach, especially when damages are not properly adjudicated ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"]. Similarly, the right to claim damages exists regardless of whether the contract is ongoing or expired ["M/s Satnam Global Infraprojects Limited vs Meghalaya Power Distribution Corporation Limited - National Company Law Tribunal"].
Breach not necessarily barred after expiry: The cases suggest that breach of contractual obligations, such as non-printing of barcodes, can still be subject to legal remedies even after the contract's validity period has ended, provided the breach occurred within the contractual timeframe and damages are ascertainable ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"], ["TISARA PACKAGING INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL"].
Specific instances: In cases involving delays or non-compliance, courts have emphasized that contractual breaches are actionable, and remedies like damages or penalties can be pursued post-expiry if the breach is proven to have occurred during the contractual period ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"], ["Design Dialogues India Pvt. Ltd. vs State Of Gujarat - Gujarat"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the provided sources, the non-printing of bar codes in a supply package, if it constitutes a breach during the contract period, can be addressed legally even after the contract has expired. The key considerations are whether the breach occurred within the contractual timeframe and if damages are demonstrable. Courts recognize that remedies for breach are not necessarily barred solely because the contract has expired, especially when the breach and damages are linked to the contractual obligations fulfilled or violated during its validity ["Koppara Enterprises Printing And Copy Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Rajeev Ramakrishnan VS State Of Kerala, Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government - Kerala"], ["TISARA PACKAGING INDUSTRIES LTD VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL"].
In the fast-paced world of supply chain management, compliance with packaging standards—like printing barcodes—is crucial. But what happens when a supplier delivers goods without barcodes, fulfilling the supply but breaching a specific obligation? A common question arises: non printing of bar code in the supply package but supply made whether the breach can be taken after the expiry of the contract?
This issue pits contractual timelines against potential ongoing liabilities. Businesses often wonder if they can still hold suppliers accountable post-expiry. While outcomes depend on specific contract terms and circumstances, legal principles generally limit post-expiry actions unless the breach is continuing. This post breaks down the analysis, drawing from key rules and precedents to guide your understanding.
Main Legal Finding: The breach regarding non-printing of barcodes in the supply package can be considered after the expiry of the contract only if the contract explicitly or implicitly provides for such a breach to be actionable post-termination or expiry. Based on provided documents, the breach must be established within the contractual period unless the contract or law explicitly states otherwise. PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD. VS DIPAK KUMAR SINGH - 2016 6 Supreme 548
These points highlight that while supply occurs, the packaging flaw triggers breach evaluation within defined windows.
Compliance with packaging rules, including barcodes, is a core obligation. Rule 6(1) mandates that every package shall bear the required declarations at the time of packaging and sale. Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. VS Kandla Port Trust Thro. Its Chairman - 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 1103 This ties barcode printing directly to the supply moment, making non-compliance a breach at delivery.
Rule 2(h) further defines these as contractual conditions. If supplies lack barcodes, it's a violation, but actionability hinges on timing. Supplies made without barcodes constitute a breach, yet post-expiry pursuit requires more. Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. VS Kandla Port Trust Thro. Its Chairman - 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 1103
The pivotal distinction: Is the barcode omission a one-time event or ongoing? Legal documents clarify: breaches must typically be established during the contractual period unless they are of a continuing nature or the breach itself has a continuing effect. PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD. VS DIPAK KUMAR SINGH - 2016 6 Supreme 548
In Sushila Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. VS Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 873, violations during inspections are addressed within contractual or regulatory frames, not post-expiry absent persistence.
Courts consistently emphasize contract subsistence and breach nature. In a key election law context under Representation of the People Act, 1951, Section 7(d), the court held: a contract is discharged by breach by one of the parties and the rescission of the contract on accepting the breach by the other. The subsistence of contractual relations between the parties is contemplated... such relations cannot be said to be subsisting when both the parties have rescinded the contract. GAURI SHANKER SHASTRI VS MAYADHARDAS RAMESHWARDAS - 1958 Supreme(MP) 227 This underscores that post-breach, contracts may not linger for new claims.
Similarly, in supply delay cases, interest claims on late payments post-supply were scrutinized. Supplies after stipulated time but within extensions allowed claims, but retrospective laws like the Interest on Delayed Payments Act, 1993, operate prospectively: A substantive law accruing vested interest... operates prospectively. Purbanchal Cables & Conductors Pvt. Ltd. VS Assam State Electricity Board - 2012 4 Supreme 369 This mirrors barcode issues—post-expiry actions need explicit basis.
Another precedent on withheld payments notes: Withholding of payments in the absence of extension of time--Arbitrator is the master of facts and law--Clear findings of breach cannot be assailed. Delhi Development Authority VS Harbans Singh - 2008 Supreme(Del) 767 Breaches tied to timelines remain confined unless extended.
In criminal contexts, non-supply or non-performance doesn't automatically extend civil remedies post-contract: Proceedings cannot be quashed merely because there is civil law remedy for breach of contract. LML Limited VS Kailash Narain Rai - 2008 Supreme(MP) 87 Yet, for packaging like barcodes, civil enforceability aligns with contract duration. V. Ramesh Babu VS State of A. P. rep. by P. P. - 2013 Supreme(AP) 519
These cases reinforce: Absent continuing effects, post-expiry barcode breach claims face hurdles. UNION OF INDIA VS BGP PRODUCTS OPERATIONS GMBH AND HAGENE IMMERMATT WEG. & ANR. ETC. - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 909 discusses timely compliance's importance within periods.
Not all breaches vanish at expiry. Consider:
For instance, in tender non-compliance cases, rejections for missing details like expiry dates highlight strict adherence, but post-contract bids aren't revisited. M/S AGAM PHARMACEUTICALS vs M/S ANITHA TEXCOT INDIA PVT TLTD
To navigate these risks:
In disputes, evidence of residual impact strengthens post-expiry cases.
Generally, a barcode non-printing breach in supplied packages must be addressed during the contract. Post-expiry enforcement typically requires proving a continuing breach or explicit provisions. If the breach is of a one-time obligation... it is generally not actionable after the contract ends unless the breach has a continuing effect. PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD. VS DIPAK KUMAR SINGH - 2016 6 Supreme 548
Key Takeaways:- Act within contractual timelines for strongest claims.- Review agreements for post-termination clauses.- Consult professionals for case-specific advice.
This post provides general insights based on legal documents and is not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction; seek qualified counsel for your situation.
References:1. UNION OF INDIA VS BGP PRODUCTS OPERATIONS GMBH AND HAGENE IMMERMATT WEG. & ANR. ETC. - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 909 – Contractual obligations and timely compliance.2. Goodrich Maritime Pvt. Ltd. VS Kandla Port Trust Thro. Its Chairman - 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 1103 – Packaging rules including barcodes.3. PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD. VS DIPAK KUMAR SINGH - 2016 6 Supreme 548 – Continuing breaches.4. Sushila Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. VS Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 873 – Inspection violations.
#ContractBreach #SupplyLaw #LegalInsights
made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. ... It is further contended that they are not responsible for the non availability of labour or printing materials or shortage of power and the decision of the subcommittee was discussed in detail by the Board of Directors in a meeting held on 19.12.2013 and it is based on the decision taken in the said ... As per the tender condition and Ext.P3 agreement, the entire supply of diaries should be #HL_START....
before the supply was completed; non-appropriation of the performance bond; sending the letter of demand ("P10") 5 years after the alleged breach etc. ... In light of the above, the contention by the Defendant that they, by their belated partial performance of the contract and non-supply of the balance textbooks, did not breach/are not in default of the contract "P1 ", but that the contract has come to a mutually agreed termi....
It is also clear that non-supply of report of the inquiry officer is in the breach of natural justice. ... The work order dated 14.11.2024 for printing, binding, set making and supply of text book of Hindi, Urdu and mixed medium under Package-52 for Class-VI in the districts of Araria, Banka and West Champaran was issued. ... Once a contract is entered, there is a legitimate expectation, that the obligations arising from the contract will be honoured....
A, and b) Supply Contract dated 02.09.2019 for Package B. ... The subject Supply Contract Agreements, dated 04.03.2019 (package A) and 02.09.2019 (Package B) were executed under the Government of India’s Saubhagya Scheme. ... Pursuant to instructions from the Corporate Debtor, the following contracts were executed: a) Package A (Eastern Zone) - Two Supply Contract Agreements dated 04.03.2019 b) Package#HL....
Whether any plea allegedly taken by a third party can serve as the basis of an absolute defence against non-performance by the claimant of its contractual obligations? 6. ... Whether the respondent has committed any breach of the obligation of the contract between the parties? 4. Whether the claimant's due performance of the obligation of the contract stood frustrated? 5. ... Whether there was any shortfall in payments mad....
Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. ... The amount of penalty for delay in delivery & installation shall be subject to a limit of 10% of the total contract value, post which the following actions will be taken. 2. ... b) Whether the petitioner can be compelled to sign the contract and asked to complete the work after the validity of the Tender expired on 25.09.2024 ? c) Whether the petitioner can be imposed a penalty of 3% for failure to complete the project ? ... (20) The It....
All that remained was to enforce the penal clauses of the agreement against the contractor for breach. The question is whether the existence of such a right in the aggrieved party can be construed as indicating the subsistence of the contract for supply of goods or for execution of a work. ... Courts must be in a position to say that the contract for supply of goods or for execution of work subsists between the Government and the candidate. If the Courts cannot fairly say that, then th....
address of manufacture, length and dimensions, lot/batch number, date of manufacturing and expiry ... OF MOTHER & BABY IT [SAMMPURNA KIT] ON RATE CONTRACT BASIS IN THE F.Y.-2018-19. ... order merely saying that ‘non- compliance as per tender Clause-5.2.2 and 5.2.7’, which is Form which pertains to the petitioner rejected the bid of the petitioner with a non-speaking
The question would be “Whether the placement of order would amount to entrustment of the property and non taking of the property would amount to breach of trust ?”. ... 18. ... Dishonest use or disposal of the property in violation of any direction of law or legal contract is the necessary ingredients to constitute an offence of breach of trust. None of the ingredients required to constitute an offence of criminal breach of trust are made out against the petitioners....
All further necessary steps for execution and signing of contract etc. be taken as per the provisions made in the part of tender documents have been blown out of proportion, which has “125MVAR SHUNT REACTORS PACKAGE (SUPPLY & ERECTION) FOR 400KV PURENA & 400KV SILIGURI SUBSTATIONS ASSOCIATED 125MVAR SHUNT REACTORS PACKAGE (SUPPLY & ERECTION) FOR 400KV URENA & 400KV SILIGURI SUBSTATIONS ASSOCIATED 125MVAR SHUNT REACTORS PACKAGE (SU....
Testing & Commissioning of EPC Package (Indian Port and Entry) 2.2 Larsen and Toubro Limited (hereafter ‘L&T’) had participated in the bidding process pursuant to the aforesaid notice inviting tenders. L&T’s bid for the contracts was accepted and on 31.03.2015, NTPC issued three Notifications of Awards in favor of L&T. 2.3 2. The controversy in the present case arises in the following context: 2.1 Tenders were invited by NTPC Limited (hereafter ‘NTPC’) for implementation of contracts relating to setting up of the Khargone Super Thermal Power Project (hereinafter ‘the Project’). T....
The supplier had completed the entire supply by 12.10.1993 and received the payment for such supplies from the respondent in the month of September and October, 1993. In pursuance to such supplies, the supplier has raised the demand for interest on delayed payment made by the respondent, vide its letters dated 14.12.1992 and 3.12.1993, however, the same was not acceded to by the buyer. Subsequently, the supplier had made another delivery of goods with respect to nine other bills in between 25.09.1992 and 30.03.1993. These supplies were made after the expiry of the time stipulated i....
The supply on confirmations received on 26th December, 1984 or thereafter could not be made before the expiry of the contract on 23rd January, 1985. Respondent claimed to be entitled to enhanced rate for supplies made after the contractual period i.e 23rd January, 1985, claiming that they were not bound to supply at the contract rate. The contract period was to expire on 23rd January, 1985. .5. It has come on record that appellant withheld certain payments in the absence of extension of time and the respondent thereforee, applied for grant of provisional extension of time u....
Accused allegedly charged for cheating for non-supply of machinery in breach of contract. Proceedings cannot be quashed merely because there is civil law remedy for breach of contract." Whether or not allegations in complaint are otherwise correct, has to be decided on the basis of evidence to be led at the time of trial.
Since it would depend upon facts and evidence, it was held in the said decision that the writ petition was not maintainable. The question was whether non-supply of road permits by the appellant would justify the breach of contract. It was pleaded on behalf of the respondent-Company that since the appellant did not supply the road permits, the respondent could not supply the p. V. C. pipes and fittings in time.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
