Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Analysis and Conclusion:Courts tend to require a contractual basis for interest charges on unpaid invoices. Without a written agreement, acknowledgment, or explicit invoice terms, interest cannot typically be charged. While some invoices may specify interest rates, these alone may not suffice if no contractual agreement exists. Therefore, unless there is clear evidence of an agreement or acknowledgment permitting interest, charging interest on unpaid invoices for services rendered without a written agreement is generally not enforceable ["Nilesh Rathi (Proprietor Of Venkateshwara Steels) VS R NUTAN BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["INDOSPIRIT DISTRIBUTION LIMITED VS KRISTAL SPIRITS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"].
Imagine sending out an invoice for your consulting services, only to have the client drag their feet on payment. Frustrated, you consider adding interest to nudge them along. But can you legally charge interest on an unpaid invoice for services rendered when there is no written agreement to that effect? This is a common dilemma for freelancers, contractors, and service-based businesses.
In this post, we'll break down the legal landscape, primarily drawing from Malaysian case law, while touching on insights from other jurisdictions. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Interest cannot be automatically charged on an unpaid invoice for services rendered solely based on customary market practice in the absence of a written agreement. This differs sharply from sales of goods, where such interest may be imposed via established custom evidenced in invoices or statements. For services, including construction work, any claim for interest requires specific proof of a similar custom through industry experts or must be pursued as interest as damages for breach of contract or via discretionary award under section 11 of the Civil Law Act 1956. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551
Key points to remember:- Default interest on unpaid goods sales is enforceable via custom without a contract, but this does not extend to services without proof.- Services claims for interest are restricted to traditional breach remedies or statutory discretion.- Invoices or statements alone do not suffice to impose interest on services absent further evidence or agreement.
The law draws a clear line between goods and services. For goods, courts have recognized that default interest stipulated in the invoice or monthly statement of accounts may be imposed and enforced on unpaid sale of goods transactions despite the absence of contractual provision because it is customary being a well established and accepted market practice. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551 However, This practice on imposition of interest cannot however be so assumed on unpaid construction work and services rendered without proof of such similar custom subsisting through construction industry experts. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551
This establishes that customary interest is not presumed for services; explicit evidence is mandatory. In contrast, cases involving goods often uphold invoice-based interest due to entrenched trade practices.
Supporting this, in a goods-related recovery suit, trade custom allowed interest at 21.75% despite no express contract reference in the invoice, as claimed via notice: specific reference to the trade custom was m.... Lakshmi Automatic Loom Works Limited VS Vibromech Engineers & Services Limited - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 4515 The court upheld the claim, noting fair appropriation of payments towards principal first.
Where custom is unproven, interest on unpaid services is not barred but channeled through standard remedies: Consequently, the claim for interest on unpaid construction work and services rendered is limited to proof by way of interest as damages for breach of contract in the usual way or discretionary interest pursuant to s 11 of the Civil Law Act 1956. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551
This limits recovery to judicial discretion or proven damages, preventing unilateral imposition via invoice alone. Courts may award post-judgment interest under statutory provisions, but you can't preemptively charge it on your invoice without basis.
Cases where interest succeeds typically involve agreements or implied practices. For instance, contractual interest at 1.5% per month was upheld as per agreements and statutory provisions in a project management services dispute. GOLD PRESTIGE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs UNILINK SDN BHD - 2022 MarsdenLR 1393 Similarly, late fee interest was imposed and carried forward on invoiced sums for services, but in a context implying established practice tied to invoices. POS LOGISTICS BHD vs KUMPULAN PERUBATAN SMARTHEALTH SDN BHD - 2019 MarsdenLR 582
In Indian cases, interest often hinges on agreements. One tribunal noted invoices for logistics services with contractual interest at 21% p.a. from due dates, per the agreement dated 15.12.2019. PATEL INTEGRATED LOGISTICS LTD. vs PHOENIX EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2133 Another upheld invoice terms charging 18% p.a. if unpaid within seven days, though post-termination periods lacked agreement. M/S. CHL LTD. vs M/S. ALITALIA AIRLINES & ORS.
Even in arbitration, claims for unpaid service invoices were allowed without interest where no basis existed: Claim No.2 relating to the 2nd invoice... is allowed rejecting the claim for interest thereon. G. AND T BECKFIELD DRILLING SERVICES PVT LTD VS OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 3 This reinforces that absent agreement or proof, interest fails.
In Dubai, disputes over rendered services under agreements focused on principal payments, with interest tied to contract terms. Mahendran v Mahfuz - 2022 Supreme(DUB)(DIFC) 7
While the rule is strict, exceptions exist:- Proven Custom: If industry experts substantiate a custom for services akin to goods, interest could apply despite no written agreement, though no document evidences such proof succeeding. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551- Statutory Discretion: Section 11 Civil Law Act allows courts to award interest post-judgment, but this is not preemptive charging on invoices.- Goods Sales Only: The custom exception is confined to sale of goods transactions, explicitly excluding services. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551- No unilateral interest on services invoices without bases; other references assume contractual support. KAY HIAN PTE LTD vs MA BOON LAN - 2003 MarsdenLR 1647KF TRADING (SABAH) SDN BHD & 2 ORS vs HARRISON TRADING - 2008 MarsdenLR 1548
Limitations from other sources highlight evidence needs: Non-issuance of invoices meant no services rendered, barring claims. RHEEM MATRIX PRIVATE LIMITED VS SI2 MICROSYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED Time-bars and proof of payments are crucial in commission claims. Pearson India Education Services Private Limited Formerly, Pearson Education Services Private Limited, Represented By Its Authorized Representative Mr. Chengappa Kundyolanda Uthappa vs Ajay Bhandari, S/o. K.V. Bhandari - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 22331
To protect your cash flow:- Avoid self-imposed interest on unpaid services invoices without agreement to prevent enforceability challenges; instead, sue for principal plus proven damages interest or seek s11 discretion.- Gather expert evidence of industry custom if claiming customary rates.- Ensure future invoices reference any interest terms explicitly to invoke contractual enforceability, as seen in upheld cases. GOLD PRESTIGE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs UNILINK SDN BHD - 2022 MarsdenLR 1393- Legal professionals should frame claims distinguishing goods/services and prioritize breach/damages arguments per prevailing authority.
Proactively include interest clauses in proposals or terms of service. Track payments diligently and send polite reminders before escalating.
By understanding these nuances, you can invoice smarter and litigate stronger. For tailored advice, reach out to a legal expert familiar with your jurisdiction.
References:1. FRONTPRISE INTERIOR SDN BHD vs ACOUSTRO CORPORATION SDN BHD - 2021 MarsdenLR 2551: Core holding on customary interest inapplicable to services without proof.2. GOLD PRESTIGE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD vs UNILINK SDN BHD - 2022 MarsdenLR 1393: Upholds contractual interest on services.3. POS LOGISTICS BHD vs KUMPULAN PERUBATAN SMARTHEALTH SDN BHD - 2019 MarsdenLR 582: Late fees in services context with basis.
#UnpaidInvoices #ServiceContractLaw #LegalInterest
It is stated that there are twenty invoices which remains unpaid for the services rendered as well as separate bills raised towards courier charges. ... 4.1 It is stated that the present suit is not maintainable since there exists no written agreement or admitted liability amounting to a liquidated demand. ... He stated that GST was only levied on domestic shipments and/or on ancillary services and thus, only one invoice (No. CL2223UP0277 dated 31.10.2022). The said ....
The Agreement came into effect on the same day i.e. 1st of July 2016. ... Further, non-issuance of invoice makes it obviously clear that no service was rendered. ... In the absence of the same it cannot be concluded that services were rendered. Hence, it is not a case of technicalities coming in the way of the claim, but that evidence of services rendered itself is absent. ... A consultancy Agreement was executed on 01.0....
into for Season-2 for a total consideration of Rs.1.20Crs/- and it is an admitted fact that the ‘Corporate Debtor’ had paid Rs.1.25Crs./- after signing this Agreement; there was no agreement for Season-3 and admittedly an amount of Rs.1Cr./- was paid for the services rendered by the Appellant and there ... of the plea in the Written Statement’. ... It is also the case of the Respondent that because of the deficient services rendered in Season-3, the cheque which was w....
The termination, however, had no effect in respect of the services till 10.01.2009. ... A perusal of the invoice shows that interest at the rate of 18% per annum was to be charged if the bill was not paid within seven days of its receipt. ... For the period subsequent to 30.09.2008, there is no written agreement between the parties agreeing to a particular tariff. ... The agreement was terminated vide letter dated 07.01.2009 #HL_STA....
-For any goods supplied or services rendered by the supplier. the buyer shall be liable to pay the amount with interest thereon as provided under section 16. ... below: “2) Interest @ 24% p.a. will be charged if this Tax Invoice is not paid on the Due Date. ... Whether any prior/past payments of interest have been made; II. Whether there exists a written agreement stipulating payment of interest; and III. ... The #....
as contractual interest accrued thereon @21% p.a. calculated from each invoice due date till its part payment and/or 31.01.2024, in respect of the logistics services rendered to the Corporate Debtor. ... It was submitted the Operational Creditor, in accordance with the terms of the said agreement dated 15.12.2019, raised multiple invoices for the services rendered to the Corporate Debtor. ... The said agreement was entered into for a period of three ....
The Claimant asserts that it has rendered Services as provided for in the Agreement and that it is entitled to payment from the Defendant of the Outstanding Amount. ... In essence, the disagreement between the parties pertains to whether the Claimant should be compensated for the Services rendered to the Defendant pursuant to the Agreement. 27. ... Pursuant to Article 4 of the Agreement, the Claimant charged the Defendant a professional ....
The claim of continuation of services by the petitioner to the CD is also not supported by any reliable evidence, including a written agreement. ... Further, there is no provision in the agreement for charge of interest on investments whereas the petitioner has claimed interest @24%. The Principal/CD was to give post-dated cheques to the petitioner as per clause 8 of the agreement. ... However, the invoices raised by the petitioner remained unpaid. S....
It has been clearly stated in clause 14 of the said Agreement that the Agreement was supposed to be automatically terminated with effect from 6 months from the date of commencement save for written and agreed upon supplementary agreement. ... This default of refund of 31 lakhs has no direct or indirect connection with supply of goods or any services in terms of written Manufacturing Agreement dated 10.07.2021. Consequently, claim of any in....
As per the agreed terms, the commission rate was 6%, and the Commercial Court exceeded its jurisdiction by altering the contractual terms, reducing the commission to 3% and effectively rewriting the agreement without any pleading to that effect. 14. ... All payments will be made prorata to the money collected from the Customer, within 10 working days of PEARSON EDUCATION SERVICES receiving an invoice from the CHANNEL PARTNER." 23. Further, Clause 2 in the agreements provides a specific term for each contract. ... However....
2.(i) Claim No.2 relating to the 2nd invoice or $20,729.17 being the outstanding balance is allowed rejecting the claim for interest thereon. Claim for interest on the same is, however, rejected. 2(ii) Claim No.3 in respect of invoice No.3 for $126536.44 being unpaid balance is allowed without interest. 2(iii) Claim No.4 relating to invoice No.4 for $30401.05 being the outstanding balance is allowed.
Further, an invoice bearing no.011173 was issued for USD 1, 500 towards barging charges. The Invoice provided that payments made beyond the due date would be charged interest @ 1% (two percent) per month. A copy of the invoice bearing Invoice No.011172 and 011173 is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "D" and Exhibit "E" respectively. On 3rd October 2016, on request of Force Shipping, plaintiff issued an Invoice bearing no.011172 on account of defendant vessel and/or master and/or owners and/or charterers and/or managers and/or operators and/or Sentex LDX for an amount of ....
Further, an invoice bearing no.011173 was issued for USD 1,500 towards barging charges. (d) On 3rd October 2016, on request of Force Shipping, plaintiff issued an Invoice bearing no.011172 on account of defendant vessel and/or master and/or owners and/or charterers and/or managers and/or operators and/or Sentex LDX for an amount of USD 283,800. The Invoice provided that payments made beyond the due date would be charged interest @ 1% (two percent) per month. A copy of the invoice bearing Invoice No.011172 and 011173 is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit “D” and Exhibit “E....
An attempt was made on behalf of the respondent/defendant that there was no contract for payment of interest at a particular rate and that therefore, the appellant/plaintiff was not entitled to interest. However, the claim of the appellant/plaintiff is based on trade custom rather than express contract. Of course it is true that there is no reference to payment of interest for belated payment of the invoice amount in the invoice produced as Ex. A11. In Ex. A4-notice dated 02.09.1996, while claiming interest at the rate of 21.75%, specific reference to the trade custom was m....
9. Though the consignee may have several interests in the goods to entitle him to sue compensation for loss in transit, as the ownership has not been relinquished by the consignor, the consignor is entitled to maintain the claim. No doubt, the learned counsel for the respondent/consignor could not answer why there was a penal clause in the invoice that in the event of payment not received within the credit period, interest would be charged. Excepting the averment in the plaint, there is also no evidence from the plaintiffs to hold that the consignee was his agent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
