Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Wrongful Billing for Electricity - The petitioner alleges wrongful and excessive billing by TSSPDCL in December 2021, citing discrepancies in meter readings and wrongful acts despite respondent awareness. The meters involved include a Main, Check, and Standby meter, with the Standby meter defined as connected via instrument transformer for billing in case of main and check meter failure. The respondents provided inconsistent justifications, which the petitioner claims violate existing regulations, indicating wrongful acts by the utility 2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 143.
Wrongful Loss in Cotton Purchase - The CBI accused individuals of conspiracy, accepting false check memos and purchasing cotton from non-farmers, causing wrongful loss to the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI). The petitioner argued they acted based on official verifications and circulars, and the allegations of circular violations were misconceived. The case involves fraudulent participation in crop procurement, with signatures/initials indicating knowledge and involvement 2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1607.
Wrongful Loss to PMC Bank - HDIL entities and individuals caused wrongful losses totaling approximately Rs. 4,355 crores through collusion, inflating costs, and wrongful gains during 2011-2015. Specific amounts paid in excess to suppliers were identified through sanction proceedings, with inflated rates and irregular transactions leading to significant wrongful gains for the accused 2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 342.
Wrongful Claims and Theft in Pilgrim Accommodation - An incident involved fraudulent receipt issuance for accommodating fewer pilgrims than recorded, causing wrongful loss of Rs. 1,534. The caretaker fabricated receipts with collusion from authorities, highlighting theft and misappropriation in pilgrim accommodation records 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 247.
Acts of Dishonesty and Fraudulent Conduct - The acts by individuals applying for e-passes or issuing documents without proper verification were deemed not to involve wrongful gain or loss, as they lacked intent as per Section 24 IPC. The acts were characterized as misleading requests rather than fraudulent or dishonest acts, with no evidence of intent to defraud or cause wrongful gain/loss 2022 0 Supreme(HP) 324,
AMAN KUMAR BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) - Himachal Pradesh
.Wrongful Loss Due to Collusion in Government Contracts - Multiple officials (A.O.1 to A.O.4) colluded to cause wrongful losses to the government, totaling over Rs. 8 lakh each, through inflated payments and inflated purchase rates during their tenure. Investigations revealed inflated costs, excess payments, and subsequent criminal cases filed, indicating systematic corruption and wrongful gains by the officials involved 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21484, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21485, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21487.
Analysis and Conclusion:Across the sources, wrongful acts encompass wrongful billing, fraudulent procurement, collusion for financial gains, and misappropriation. The common theme involves acts done with intent to cause wrongful gain or loss, often supported by official collusion, forged documents, or regulatory violations. In some cases, acts lacked the necessary criminal intent, thus not qualifying as fraudulent under IPC. The evidence points to systemic misconduct in utilities, government procurement, and corporate transactions, with legal proceedings and regulatory violations highlighted in each instance.
In the world of business transactions, cheques are a common payment method, but what happens when a cheque is issued for a wrongful or illegal debt? Imagine issuing a cheque tied to an —does its dishonour lead to criminal prosecution under (NI Act)? This question often arises in disputes involving questionable transactions. Check Issued for Wrongful that d E B t—decoding this as a cheque for wrongful debt—highlights a critical legal nuance: not all debts are enforceable.
This blog explores the legal position, drawing from judicial precedents and statutory provisions. Note: This is general information based on established principles and should not be considered specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A cheque issued for a wrongful or illegal debt or liability, such as one arising from an or consideration, does not constitute a or liability under Section 138 of the NI Act. Consequently, dishonour of such a cheque does not amount to an offence under Section 138.2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 375
Section 138 requires the cheque to be for the discharge of any debt or other liability. Courts emphasize that this must be a legally enforceable one. Only a or liability can support a prosecution under Section 1382023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 375. If the underlying obligation stems from an illegal source, it's void and unenforceable.
Under , agreements with unlawful objects or consideration are . Contracts or agreements with or object are void and do not create enforceable obligations2003 0 Supreme(Ker) 205 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356. Examples include contracts for illegal activities or those against public policy.
If the debt or liability is unlawful, or the consideration is illegal, the cheque issued in respect of such is not for a 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 375 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 273. Courts have quashed proceedings where cheques linked to unlawful transactions were involved. The issuance of a cheque in connection with an or consideration is not punishable under Section 1382022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 375.
For instance, a cheque for gambling debts or payments under void agreements fails the enforceability test. When a cheque is issued in connection with an , the offence under Section 138 is not made out, and proceedings can be rightly quashed2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 375.
presumes the cheque was for a . However, this is rebuttable. The burden of proving that the debt or liability is lawful and enforceable is on the complainant; if the debt is unlawful or the consideration is illegal, the offence is not made out2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356
.
The accused can demonstrate illegality, shifting the onus back. The burden of proof on the accused to establish that the debt is unlawful or consideration illegal
.
Wrongful debts often appear in cases of fraud, collusion, or regulatory violations, mirroring the principles above. Consider these scenarios from legal records:
Wrongful Billing in Utilities: In electricity billing disputes, consumers alleged wrongful billing for electricity due to meter discrepancies and wrongful acts by the utility, including inconsistent justifications violating regulations. Such inflated or improper bills may render related cheques unenforceable if proven unlawful 2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 143.
Fraudulent Procurement and : Officials caused to the Government through collusion, such as accepting false check memos and purchasing cotton from non-farmers, leading to losses for the . Caused to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.8,168/-—these acts highlight how illegal transactions taint debts 2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1607 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21486.
Corporate Collusion and Massive Losses: Entities inflicted wrongful losses totaling approximately Rs. 4,355 crores via inflated costs and irregular transactions. A.O.1, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused to the Government—cheques tied to such fraud lack legality 2025 Supreme(Online)(ATFP) 342.
Misappropriation in Public Services: Fraudulent receipts for pilgrim accommodations caused of Rs. 1,534 through fabricated records. Acts done with intention to cause to one person or to another under underscore the illegality 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 247
.
These cases illustrate or loss intent, often without defenses like proper verification, reinforcing that unlawful debts void Section 138 claims 2022 0 Supreme(HP) 324.
Not every disputed debt is unlawful:- Lawful Debts Persist: If the debt or liability is lawful and enforceable, even if the original contract was unlawful or void, the cheque can support a prosecution2006 0 Supreme(Del) 2061.- Mixed Questions of Fact and Law: Legality may require trial evidence, not dismissal at inception.- No Automatic Invalidity: doesn't always void a valid debt.
Summary: A cheque issued for a wrongful or illegal debt—such as one arising from an , consideration, or object—lacks the legal enforceability required under Section 138 of the NI Act. As such, dishonour of such a cheque does not constitute an offence under Section 138.2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356
Key Takeaways:- Only legally enforceable debts trigger Section 138 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 1356.- Unlawful contracts void obligations under Section 23, Contract Act 2003 0 Supreme(Ker) 205.- Rebut with illegality proof
.- Real cases of (e.g., billing fraud, collusion) exemplify unenforceable debts.
Understanding these principles can prevent misguided prosecutions or bolster defenses. Stay informed on NI Act developments to navigate cheque-related disputes effectively.
#Section138, #ChequeBounce, #IllegalDebt
MDK-1060 with CMD of 24 MVA, voltage of 132 KVA, having a Main, Check and Standby meter bearing Serial number as follows: Y0265840 (Main meter), Y0265845 (Check Meter), Y0265850 (Stand by Meter). ... According to petitioner, the post-facto justifications provided by the respondents for the wrongful billing of petitioner for December 2021 are contrary to the Regulations in force and it is stated that respondents are aware about the same but ....
The CBI alleged that he had entered into a criminal conspiracy with private traders and others, accepted false and fabricated check memos and takpatties as genuine, and purchased cotton from non-farmers in violation of the CCI circulars, thereby causing wrongful loss to the CCI and corresponding wrongful ... The petitioner submitted that he, as a Centre In- charge, had acted only upon such verifications and instructions issued#HL_....
(HDIL) and other entities of HDIL for causing wrongful losses to the bank to the tune of Rs. 4,355 crores and corresponding gain to themselves and others. The check period for the aforesaid was taken from 18.07.2011 to 9.01.2015. ... Kuldeep Singh Wadhwan of HDIL and promotes and executive of many other HDIL entities for causing wrongful loss to the tune of Rs. 4,355 crores to the PMC Bank. ... Rakesh Kumar Wadhawan of M/s HDIL and others ....
, though they were issued with receipts for accommodating only 28 pilgrims. ... Any such wrongful claims, theft or misappropriation with the passive or active collusion of the authorities concerned, which are acts of ‘fence eating the crops’ should be dealt with sternly. ... As per the report, on examination of Room No.19 in Sree Matha Accommodation Centre, it was found that though 35 pilgrims were accommodated, they were issued only receip....
—Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person, is said to do that thing “dishonestly”. 25. “Fraudulently”. ... He was not having any other via-media to check and verify the system except submitting a misleading request. ... As per Section 24 IPC, ‘dishonestly’ means an act done with intention to cause wrongful gain to one person or wrongful#HL_....
He was not having any other via-media to check and verify the system except submitting a misleading request. ... As per Section 24 IPC, ‘dishonestly’ means an act done with intention to cause wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person. Whereas, fraudulently means to do a thing with intention to defraud, but not otherwise. ... —Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one pers....
A.O.1, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.8,168/-; A.O.2, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.39,250/-; A.O.3, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful ... loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.90,826/-, and A.O.4, in collusion with A.Os.1 to 3, caused wrongfu....
A.O.1, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.8,168/-; A.O.2, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.39,250/-; A.O.3, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful ... loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.90,826/-, and A.O.4, in collusion with A.Os.1 to 3, caused wrongfu....
A.O.1, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.8,168/-; A.O.2, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.39,250/-; A.O.3, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful ... loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.90,826/-, and A.O.4, in collusion with A.Os.1 to 3, caused wrongfu....
A.O.1, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.8,168/-; A.O.2, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.39,250/-; A.O.3, in collusion with A.Os.4 and 5, caused wrongful ... loss to the Government during his tenure to an extent of Rs.90,826/-, and A.O.4, in collusion with A.Os.1 to 3, caused wrongfu....
3. For the appointment of B.E.D. and T.E.T. approved candidates, vide the government order issued earlier no. 1283/XXIV (1) 2011-28/2010 dated 14.12.2011, the prescribed district-wise selection process was challenged before the Hon’ble High Court, Nainital and the Hon’ble High Court in the judgment dated 25.11.2013 passed in Special Appeal No. 380/2010, did not find the district-wise selection process, to be justified. As such, the directions issued from time to time as also ....
Officials, the meter was said to have recorded only 2/3 consumption due to defective wiring connection done outside metering mechanism i.e. Biecco Lawrie Panel. This was said to have been informed to consumer and same was said to have been rectified on 22.3.96. Central Hotels, Chennai-3 was effected on 27.2.95 with sanctioned demand of 250KVA power check calculation by disc rotation method was done incorrectly. After one year when power check was carried out by T.N.E.B.
incumbent, when he submits an application for contract teacher Grade III to teach at primary level. (2) The candidates shall have to submit the mark-sheet pertaining to the required degree, diploma, certificate with the application. * Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade II for B.Ed./B.Ed. (Special Education)/B.T.C./D .Ed./D.S.E. 20 marks of experience of educational qualification are not to be awarded to the B.Ed. * Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade III for D.Ed./B.T.C./D.S.E.#....
2. According to the prosecution case D. E. P. B. (Duty Entitlement Pass book) licences for importing raw materials are issued by D. G. F. T. and LCD.
The Tender Form has been attached with the writ petition as Annexure P-1. The respondent-Corporation had issued the aforesaid tender notice for three works related to the area under the D.T.E., Rajpura, D.T.E., Zirakpur and D.T.E., Fatehgarh Sahib. The petitioner wanted to participate in the tender process. He was sought to be debarred from participation on the basis of Clause 4 of the Tender notice which is as under :-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
