Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Describing a Corporate in Cause Title - Typically, a corporate entity is identified by its legal name, which may include its proprietorship, partnership, or company designation, such as M/s. or Proprietor. The cause title often reflects the corporate's registered name and its representative or proprietor to clearly establish legal identity ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"].
Corporate Identity and Title Disputes - Courts emphasize the importance of accurately representing corporate titles, especially in property or legal disputes. For example, the description of plaintiffs or defendants as M/s. ESS EMM ENTERPRISES or Meena Garments duly represented by its Proprietor illustrates how cause titles incorporate the corporate or proprietorial identity ["T. M. International duly VS Meena Garments duly - Madras"], ["CHONG YOON CHOI & ANOR vs 88 RESTORAN GUO TAI SDN BHD 21 & ORS - High Court"].
Piercing the Corporate Veil and Name Removal - When disputes involve misuse or abuse of corporate personality, courts may pierce the corporate veil or order the removal of a corporate entity's name from cause titles if the entity is used to evade liabilities or commit fraud. Repeatedly, courts have directed the Registrar to expunge the name of OP No.5 (a corporate or individual entity) from cause titles after resisting claims or seeking to avoid liability, based on the principle that the law can go behind the corporate persona to reveal true ownership or responsibility ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"].
Legal Principles for Cause Titles - Cause titles should accurately reflect the corporate or individual parties involved, but courts also recognize that the legal process may involve lifting the veil to ascertain true ownership or control, especially in cases of fraud, abuse, or improper conduct. This sometimes results in courts ordering the removal or correction of cause titles to reflect the true nature of the parties involved ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"].
Main Insights - The description of a corporate in cause titles should be precise and legally appropriate, often including the corporate name and its representative. In cases of dispute, courts may pierce the corporate veil or order its name's expungement if the entity is used improperly, emphasizing the importance of accurate identification to ensure justice and proper adjudication ["RASHMI CEMENT LIMITED VS MR. SANJAY VIJAY JESWANI LIQUIDATOR OF YATIN STEEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"].
Conclusion:A corporate in cause titles is generally described by its registered name and representative, but courts retain the authority to pierce the corporate veil or remove the corporate name from cause titles when necessary to prevent misuse or fraud, ensuring the true parties are properly identified for justice to be served ["RASHMI CEMENT LIMITED VS MR. SANJAY VIJAY JESWANI LIQUIDATOR OF YATIN STEEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["Samit Dutta vs Bhaskar Chakraborty - Consumer State"].
In legal proceedings, the cause title (or case caption) serves as the foundational identifier of parties involved. Getting it wrong can lead to procedural delays, objections, or even dismissal of claims. A common question arises: how should a corporation be described in a cause title? This post breaks down the principles, drawing from established legal doctrines and case insights to guide accurate drafting.
Properly naming a corporation ensures it is recognized as a distinct legal entity capable of suing or being sued. Misdescriptions, as seen in various judgments, can complicate matters—such as when parties are wrongly labeled or omitted. We'll explore the nature of corporations, distinctions between types, practical examples, and tips from real cases. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
The cause title appears at the top of pleadings and identifies the court, parties, suit number, and nature of the proceeding. For corporations, precision is key because they are artificial beings or legal persons with rights and obligations separate from their members. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR VS CANARA BANK - 2018 6 Supreme 681
Courts emphasize clarity to avoid ambiguity. For instance, in one case, the cause title was corrected by hand to accurately reflect parties after abatement issues. On The Death of Bhupendra Nath Barua His Legal Heirs Srimati Rina Barooah VS Central Bank of India - 2017 Supreme(Gau) 86 Another highlighted a wrong description post-remand, noting the petitioner was actually the respondent corporation. S. Kanaga VS District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 3088
A corporation is fundamentally an artificial being and a legal person. It possesses rights and properties conferred by its establishing legislation or charter. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR VS CANARA BANK - 2018 6 Supreme 681
This status allows it to:- Sue and be sued in its own name.- Hold property and enter contracts.- Be described distinctly in captions to reflect its corporate character.
Vague references undermine this. Instead, captions should affirm its body corporate status, ensuring judicial recognition of its separate personality.
Distinguishing these is crucial for accurate description:
This impacts caption phrasing. Statutory ones typically reference the enabling Act for authority.
Best practices include:- Identifying as a corporation or body corporate.- Specifying statutory or non-statutory nature.- Naming the establishing Act if applicable.
Recommended formats:- The Name, a statutory body established under the Act.- The Name, a non-statutory body governed by the Statute.
Example: North Uttar Pradesh Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA), a statutory corporation established under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR VS CANARA BANK - 2018 6 Supreme 681
In practice, documents often explicitly mention legislative basis to affirm status. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR VS CANARA BANK - 2018 6 Supreme 681
Judgments reinforce the need for precision:
These cases show misdescriptions can invoke jurisdiction challenges or procedural objections. For instance, one ruling noted: the cause title of the plaint to show as to how the defendant No.1 was described. R/C. Bysack VS Naba Nagari Co-operative Housing Society Limited - 2016 Supreme(Cal) 349
In insolvency contexts, corporate debtors are precisely named, but title disputes (e.g., trademarks or land) are often deferred to civil courts, underscoring caption accuracy's role in jurisdictional clarity. Gloster Limited VS Gloster Cables Limited - 2026 Supreme(SC) 88M/s Area Importers and Exporters Private Limited vs M/s Gupta Builders and Promoters Private Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 8281
Exceptions arise in specialized proceedings, like administrative tribunals, where rules may not strictly mirror CPC on party descriptions. Mohamed Sheek Alavudeen VS Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench - 2015 Supreme(Mad) 1044
To ensure compliance:1. Research thoroughly: Confirm via statutes or charters.2. Use precise language: Reflect legal nature explicitly.3. Anticipate objections: Include supporting annexures if needed.4. Seek precedents: Reference similar captions from judgments.
In one appeal, the court directed: The necessary correction be made in the cause title by hand. On The Death of Bhupendra Nath Barua His Legal Heirs Srimati Rina Barooah VS Central Bank of India - 2017 Supreme(Gau) 86 This underscores judicial willingness to rectify but preference for initial accuracy.
Final Note: Accurate cause titles promote efficient justice. While these principles are generally followed, variations exist by jurisdiction. For tailored guidance, engage legal professionals. References include foundational analyses on corporate nature COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR VS CANARA BANK - 2018 6 Supreme 681 and procedural guidance Ramesh B. Desai VS Bipin Vadilal Mehta - 2006 6 Supreme 44.
Word count approximation: 950
#CorporateLaw, #CaseCaption, #LegalDrafting
title deeds and documents to the Corporate Debtor. ... , except the title which the Company had on its assets as on date of transfer. ... Unsustainable Debt of all the Creditors shall be deemed to have been converted into equity shares of Corporate Debtor; (iii) the entire existing share capital shall be deemed to stand cancelled and extinguished, as more particularly described in prayer clause (b); (iv) issuing ... Process Memorandum Page 10- “The Company is proposed to be sold on "As is where is basi....
These proceedings may cause undue delay in the insolvency resolution process due to multiple proceedings in trial courts and courts of appeal. ... to the Corporate Debtor. ... The issue of the title of the Trademark was not “in relation to the insolvency proceedings”, on the facts of the present case. ... Learned senior counsel submitted that a trademark title cannot be summarily decided. Learned senior counsel submitted that unlike immovable property of the value of more than one hundred where title ge....
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”) seeking exclusion of certain parcels of land from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of the Corporate Debtor. ... The Respondent submits that the present dispute, being a pre-CIRP title dispute, is beyond the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. ... Company Appeal (AT) No. 210, 246 & 258 of 2019, wherein it was held that a sale deed executed without a valid board resolution cannot be treated as conveying lawful title.
The first is a survey dated July, 1870, which relates to Coangahawatta, and the area of Coangahawatta is therein described as 16 65/100 square perches. The second is a survey dated February, 1872, which relates to Bilingahawatta, the area of which is described as 2 roods 4 square perches. ... - (1) Have plaintiffs a cause of action against the defendants? (2) Who were the previous holders of the premises in dispute? (3) Did the congregation of the Baptist church at Madampe occupy the premises as tenants under such previous holders?....
[97] As to what constitutes fraudulent purposes, it has been described as including actual fraud or fraud in equity. ... SD2: There are no pending legal proceedings nor claims against the Vendor which may affect the Vendor's title or its rights to dispose of the Schedule I don't know how this and the stock. Q: Okay sila nyatakan kepada mahkamah bila perjanjian ini dimasuki oleh kamu? SD2: Bila sign. ... Despite the wording of this agreement, SD2 gave evidence to the contrary when he said that some assets (or chattels as described by the....
The petitioner, who was appointed as a Specialist Teacher belonging to the Craft Group, i.e., Sewing Teacher in St.Thomas High School, Thankamony under the 7th respondent Corporate
As a matter of fact, the Corporate Debtor was defined in the said Agreement as the Licensor and Energy Properties were described only as a confirming party. Admittedly, this Agreement was confined to land of the extent of 10000 sq. ft. out of the total extent of acres 10.19. ... M/s Energy Properties Private Limited4[For short, “Energy Properties”] which is the appellant in CA No.1782 of 2021 is the ostensible owner of the said property, in whose name the title stands. ... That the Corporate Debtor was required to pay th....
[1] The appellant, who is the plaintiff in the original suit, claims against the respondent (defendant) that the bungalow known as Lot B11, Garden Villa, Mile 6, North Road, Sandakan, Sabah held under Master Title ... It is submitted that piercing the corporate veil is a question of law and need not be pleaded. Therefore, the principles in Prest's case applies in the plaintiff's case. ... Since the defendant evades the obligation on the basis the bungalow is registered under the defendant's name, the Court has the power to pierce the corporate#H....
I had a look at the cause title of the C.S.No.150 of 2011. The plaintiff has been described as M/S.ESS EMM ENTERPRISES (a Proprietorship concern). In the cause title of the judgment of the Delhi High Court, the proprietary concern alone has been mentioned. ... M.S.S.Food Products (2012)2 SCC 196, the title of the plaintiff was described as follows: "The plaint filed by the plaintiff describes the title of the plaintiff as follows: "Messrs M.S.S. ... ....
The name of revisionist/OP No.5 be strike off from the cause title of the petition of complaint. The Registrar of the Commission is directed to send a copy of the order to the Ld. ... After entered appearance, the OP No.5/revisionist by filing a written version resisted the claim of the complainant and prayed for expunging his name from the cause title of the petition of complaint. ... By the process, commonly described as “lifting the veil “, the law either goes behind the #HL_STAR....
Obviously revision petitioner is third respondent/Tirunelveli Municipal Corporation and not writ petitioner. Also to be noted in the impugned order, cause title has been wrongly described post remand. There is no disputation about this aspect of the matter.
Defendants 1 and 2 take objection to the maintainability of O.S. No.105 of 2000 under Section 69(2) of IP Act. The plaintiff in the cause title described that it is a registered partnership firm. 15. Cargo Care International/plaintiff claims to be a partnership firm, represented by its Managing Partner, as the agent at Kochi of M/s. Al Sahal Shipping, Abu Dhabi/defendant No.3, has filed the suit. The argument proceeds to point out that the primary evidence of proof of registration of Firm is not filed by plaintiff.
The necessary correction be made in the cause title by hand. The abatement of the writ petition stand set aside and the legal heirs of the writ petitioner No.3 as named in the application are permitted to be brought on record by means of substitution as petitioner Nos.3(a) and 3(b).
He admitted that the rules and/or bye laws are not annexed to the plaint. The defendant No. 1 was described as a registered Housing Cooperative Society. He thus, restricted his submission to support the impugned order by referring to the pleadings of the plaint. Firstly he drew our attention to the cause title of the plaint to show as to how the defendant No.1 was described in the cause title of the plaint.
As between themselves, the Act, the 1987 Rules and the 1993 Rules of Practice constitute a complete code and hence, there is no scope of importing a principle born out of the rigours of the Code into the proceedings before the Administrative Tribunal. These Rules also do not contain any prescription as to how a respondent is to be described in the long and short cause title. 20. Apart from the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987, issued by the Central Government, the Central Administrative Tribunal itself has issued a set of rules known as the Central Ad....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
