Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Dyeing Contract & Deemed Sale - The process of dyeing involves passing grey cloth through chemical solutions, with no intention to transfer ownership of goods; the dyeing results are due to chemical reactions causing color changes by accretion, not transfer of property. The entire process is deemed a sale of services, and the amount received is assessed under Works Contract provisions as per Section 5-F of the APGST Act ["THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL vs M/S.SURYAVANSHI SPINNING MILLS LIMITED - Telangana"] ["THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL vs M/S.SURYAVANSHI SPINNING MILLS LIMITED - Telangana"].
Doubtfulness of Dying Declarations - Multiple sources highlight that dying declarations are often considered doubtful due to discrepancies in signatures, timing, and the capacity of the declarant to give such statements. Factors such as over-writing, delay in recording, absence of certification of the declarant's mental fitness, and inconsistencies in signatures and timing cast serious doubts on their reliability. Courts emphasize that dying declarations must be scrutinized carefully and should be trustworthy, voluntary, and made when the declarant is in a fit state of mind ["N.ARUMUGAM vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Madras"] ["Ramkaran vs State Of M.P. - Madhya Pradesh"] ["Salim Kasam Shaikh VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["Babli VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"] ["Umesh VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["Ajay Verma S/o Ganesh Verma VS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Station House Officer, Police Station Suhela - Chhattisgarh"] ["State Of Gujarat VS Mahobatsinh Narendrasinh Jadeja - Gujarat"] ["Rameshwar Lal Chauhan VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"] ["ATTAR SHINUP LTD vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS - Punjab and Haryana"] ["Jaydevi Saroj VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"] ["Nowa Bai VS State - Delhi"] ["Poornima Rajkumar Chawla VS Union Of India - Gujarat"] ["Prakash s/o Rupa Rathod VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["Bapu Bajarang Patil VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["M/S.VICTUS DYEING vs THE SALES TAX APPELLATE - Madras"].
Legal Principles & Court Observations - Courts have consistently held that if a dying declaration is found to be doubtful due to inconsistencies, delay, or incapacity of the declarant, it should not be solely relied upon for conviction. Proper certification of the declarant’s mental state, prompt recording, and consistency with other evidence are crucial for its admissibility and probative value ["N.ARUMUGAM vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Madras"] ["Salim Kasam Shaikh VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["Babli VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"].
Implication for Evidence & Conviction - The reliability of dying declarations is paramount; when doubts arise regarding their authenticity, timing, or the mental state of the declarant, courts tend to give benefit of doubt to the accused. Such declarations, if found to be inconsistent, over-written, or recorded after significant delay, are often excluded from evidentiary consideration ["N.ARUMUGAM vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Madras"] ["Salim Kasam Shaikh VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay"] ["Babli VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
The collected sources underscore that while dying declarations can be powerful evidence, their reliability is heavily dependent on proper recording, timely documentation, and the declarant’s mental capacity. In numerous cases cited, doubts about signatures, timing, and capacity have led courts to deem such declarations doubtful, thereby weakening the prosecution’s case. Courts emphasize rigorous scrutiny of these declarations to prevent wrongful convictions based on unreliable evidence. Similarly, the process of dyeing is regarded as a service contract with no transfer of ownership, and the assessment of such transactions as deemed sales under Works Contract law is well-established.
In criminal cases, particularly those involving murder or serious offenses, a dying declaration can serve as powerful evidence. However, what happens when such a declaration raises doubts? The question of a doubtful dying declaration often arises, prompting courts to scrutinize its reliability closely. This blog post delves into the legal principles governing when a dying declaration may be considered unreliable, drawing from established precedents and judicial analyses.
Dying declarations, admissible under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, carry significant weight due to the presumption that a person facing imminent death speaks the truth. Yet, courts have consistently held that they are not infallible. If doubts emerge regarding the declarant's mental state, procedural lapses, or inconsistencies, the declaration cannot form the sole basis for conviction. This analysis explores these nuances, helping readers understand the evidentiary challenges in such cases.
Note: This post provides general information based on legal precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific cases.
A dying declaration is a statement made by a person who is aware of their impending death, typically identifying the perpetrator of a crime. While it can lead to conviction without corroboration if deemed reliable, courts emphasize caution. As noted, a dying declaration must inspire full confidence in its truthfulness and correctness before it can be the basis for a conviction. If the declaration is found to be doubtful, it cannot be relied upon State Of Maharashtra VS Sanjay S/o Digambarrao Rajhans - Supreme Court (2004).
The Supreme Court and High Courts have outlined strict criteria to ensure reliability, especially in high-stakes cases like those under Section 302 IPC (murder).
Inconsistencies, particularly in multiple dying declarations, can undermine credibility. Courts prefer the earliest declaration and require corroboration if discrepancies exist. For instance, in cases of multiple dying declarations, inconsistencies necessitate corroboration for conviction; the earliest declaration indicating self-immolation was preferred, creating reasonable doubt Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860.
The presence of material inconsistencies between declarations renders them unreliable, as courts must examine if these affect the core narrative Amol Singh VS State of M. P. - Supreme Court (2008). In one appeal under Section 374 CrPC, the court acquitted the appellant due to reasonable doubts regarding the prosecution's case, particularly concerning the reliability of multiple dying declarations and eyewitness testimonies Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860.
The declarant's fitness to make the statement is paramount. Without medical certification confirming consciousness and coherence, the declaration is suspect. Medical officer PW8 who recorded the dying declaration did not certify that the victim was in a fit state to make statement. Bed head ticket had not been produced. Capacity of the victim to make dying declaration is doubtful Sk. Allauddin @ Alauddin Sk @ Sk. Tara VS State of West Bengal - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 862.
Similarly, if the declarant was unconscious or impaired, reliability suffers Pankaj VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court (2016) Bhupan VS State Of M. P. - Supreme Court (2002). Courts have dismissed declarations recorded without proper certification of fitness Pankaj VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court (2016).
Adherence to legal procedures is non-negotiable. Deviations, such as improper recording or lack of independent witnesses, raise red flags. The procedure followed in recording the dying declaration must adhere to established legal practices. Any deviation can lead to questions about its validity Janardhan Barku Solanke VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2016).
In another case, the absence of a requisition before recording the victim's statement invalidated it: The alleged statement of the deceased is not dyeing declaration. The evidence given by the PSI is contrary to the case in hand. Requisition of the statement of the victim was not given before sending the statement of injured Devaraja Ramappa Ramannavar VS State Of Karnataka - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 297.
Courts have shaped these principles through landmark rulings:
Need for Corroboration: The evidentiary value is not absolute; corroboration is essential if reliability is in question Krishan VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court (2012).
Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 Case: Prosecution failed to prove authenticity due to lack of medical and witness support, leading to appeal dismissal State of J&K VS Satya Devi - J&K (2022).
Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works Case: Highlighted procedural correctness; cryptic documentation undermines validity Devi Products VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat (2023).
From other precedents:
- In a Supreme Court observation, statements supporting the dying declaration were deemed doubtful, disapproving the High Court's judgment Arvind Kumar Verma v. State - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11488.
- Another case upheld conviction where the declaration was reliable, recorded by a disinterested medical officer, emphasizing it can be sole basis if voluntary and untutored Sk. Allauddin @ Alauddin Sk @ Sk. Tara VS State of West Bengal - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 862. However, contrasting this, acquittals occur when doubts persist, as in cases with unreliable eyewitnesses tied to the declaration Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860.
In a Section 302 IPC appeal, the court converted conviction to Section 304(II) due to lack of premeditation, supported by medical evidence but noting survival period post-incident Dinesh VS State of Gujarat - 2015 Supreme(Guj) 907.
Even a seemingly credible dying declaration benefits from support:
- Medical evidence
- Eyewitness testimonies
- Forensic reports
From the cumulative reading of the evidences of P.W-3 and P.W-9, we safely arrive at a conclusion that they are not reliable persons to place any conviction on the basis of their doubtful testimonies Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860. Courts stress that reasonable doubt—making guilt highly doubtful—warrants acquittal.
In suicide-related cases under Sections 498A/306 IPC, lack of corroborated cruelty evidence led to acquittal, underscoring prosecution's burden Shrikrishna Marotrao Thawkar VS State of Maharashtra, Through P. S. O. Police Station Ner, Taluka Ner, District Yavatmal - 2015 Supreme(Bom) 2286.
To strengthen or challenge a dying declaration:
- Ensure Certification: Obtain medical endorsement of fitness Pankaj VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court (2016).
- Scrutinize Inconsistencies: Prefer earliest statement in multiples Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860.
- Seek Corroboration: Rely on independent witnesses and forensics Krishan VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court (2012).
- Follow Procedures: Avoid delays or irregularities in recording Devaraja Ramappa Ramannavar VS State Of Karnataka - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 297.
A doubtful dying declaration cannot sustain a conviction, as courts prioritize justice over expediency. Factors like inconsistencies, lack of fitness certification, and procedural flaws often tip the scales toward doubt. While a reliable declaration can be pivotal, the Supreme Court reminds us: reliability inspires confidence State Of Maharashtra VS Sanjay S/o Digambarrao Rajhans - Supreme Court (2004).
Key Takeaways:
- Multiple inconsistent declarations require corroboration.
- Medical fitness is mandatory.
- Procedural lapses invalidate evidence.
- Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt.
References: State Of Maharashtra VS Sanjay S/o Digambarrao Rajhans - Supreme Court (2004) Amol Singh VS State of M. P. - Supreme Court (2008) Pankaj VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court (2016) Bhupan VS State Of M. P. - Supreme Court (2002) Janardhan Barku Solanke VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2016) Krishan VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court (2012) State of J&K VS Satya Devi - J&K (2022) Devi Products VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat (2023) Suguna VS State by Inspector of Police, Thiruvannamalai Town Police Station - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 1860 Arvind Kumar Verma v. State - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11488 Sk. Allauddin @ Alauddin Sk @ Sk. Tara VS State of West Bengal - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 862 Devaraja Ramappa Ramannavar VS State Of Karnataka - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 297 Dinesh VS State of Gujarat - 2015 Supreme(Guj) 907 Shrikrishna Marotrao Thawkar VS State of Maharashtra, Through P. S. O. Police Station Ner, Taluka Ner, District Yavatmal - 2015 Supreme(Bom) 2286
Stay informed on evolving criminal law—share your thoughts below!
#DyingDeclaration #CriminalLaw #LegalInsights
deemed sale of the dyes, chemical and colours used in the process of dyeing and printing. ... He submitted that for the purpose of dyeing, the grey cloth supplied by the customer is passed through a chemical solution prepared by the respondent for several times and on completion of dyeing, the entire solution is thrown as waste. ... In the contract for dyeing, neither there is intention to transfer goods nor any intention to transfer the property in goods in any form and in fact on dyeing, neither the g....
deemed sale of the dyes, chemical and colours used in the process of dyeing and printing. ... He submitted that for the purpose of dyeing, the grey cloth supplied by the customer is passed through a chemical solution prepared by the respondent for several times and on completion of dyeing, the entire solution is thrown as waste. ... In the contract for dyeing, neither there is intention to transfer goods nor any intention to transfer the property in goods in any form and in fact on dyeing, neither the g....
9.The prosecution case has been made based on the oral dyeing declaration given by the deceased to PWs 1, 2, 3 & 8. The possibility of her statement before the witness is doubtful as per the evidence of PW 7/RDO, PW 9. ... the prosecution is doubtful. ... However, the entire prosecution case has been projected as if the deceased gave an oral dyeing declaration to PW 1 and other witnesses PW 2, PW 3 and PW 8, who are the close relatives. ... While so, the prosecution has projected the ....
P-7, the dying declaration. On comparison also, these signatures are having some difference in letters. This fact also renders this document doubtful. ... It also reveals from dying declaration (Ex.P/7) that there was no noting that it is read over to the deceased and deceased accepted it to be true. These facts renders the dying declaration (Ex.P/7) doubtful. 25. ... So far as the dying declaration (Exh. P-7) recorded by Dr. H.K. ... That also renders these documents doubtfu....
As a matter of understanding, reasonable doubts means a doubt which would render the possibility of guilt as highly doubtful. Here, the above listed reasonable doubts would definitely cast a serious doubt to the Prosecution's case and would make the possibility of guilt highly doubtful. ... Therefore, from the cumulative reading of the evidences of P.W-3 and P.W-9, we safely arrive at a conclusion that they are not reliable persons to place any conviction on the basis of their doubtful testimonies. ... The other dying declaratio....
He further submitted that taking into consideration the degree of burns, it is doubtful that deceased was able at all to give any dying declaration. ... Only piece of evidence was dying declaration and it being doubtful in nature, ought not to have made basis for conviction. Consequently, he prays to allow the appeal by setting aside the judgment and order of conviction. 8. ... Case of prosecution is based on dying declaration. However, according to him, the said dying declaration (Exh....
Therefore, dying declaration is doubtful and is not a reliable document and the benefit of doubt has to be given to the accused persons. I. ... Sixthly, the alleged motive for the homicidal death is highly doubtful. ... The common argument raised by counsels for all accused persons is that the Dying Declaration is a doubtful document as the opinion of the Doctor that the victim was in a fit state of mind is not obtained on the Dying Declaration and only on the OPD Notes, it is mention....
The dying declaration itself is doubtful, as there is scoring of timing in the dying declaration and the explanation is not given by the Executive Magistrate why there is scoring, which creates doubt about the dying declaration itself. ... No explanation regarding said over-writing and exactly what does it convey - That apart, thumb impression of deceased not appearing in full below DD - Deceased had sustained 82% burn injuries and only knicker shaped area of body left intact - Therefore, deceased really affixed her thum....
Their Lordships of Supreme Court finding the statement of PW - 3 and PW - 7 who allegedly supported the dying declaration was doubtful and did not approve the judgment of the High Court, as such is not in any way helpful to the appellant herein. ... It has been held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court that the dying declaration was highly doubtful in nature. Similarly, in the matter of Laxman (supra), their Lordships of the Supreme Court relying upon the judgment of Dilip Singh V. ... to dying declaration#H....
Medical officer PW8 who recorded the dying declaration did not certify that the victim was in a fit state to make statement. Bed head ticket had not been produced. Capacity of the victim to make dying declaration is doubtful. ... The other pieces of evidence with regard to accidental burning coming from PWs 5 and 6 i.e. neighbours of the appellant is of equal doubtful credibility. These witnesses came out with the version of accidental burning for the first time in Court. ... Learned Advocate for the appellant has assail....
The alleged statement of the deceased is not dyeing declaration. The evidence given by the PSI is contrary to the case in hand. Requisition of the statement of the victim was not given before sending the statement of injured.
He accepted that dyeing declaration Exhibit-24 shows two thumb impressions. This dyeing declaration has been recorded at about 9:00 in the evening/night on 13.3.2012. There is nothing in his cross examination to discredit his evidence on solemn affirmation. Though he had taken thumb impression only once, perusal of dyeing declaration Exhibit-26, in original, shows that so called other thumb impression is very faint repetition which may have appeared accidentally. Not mentioning date, on which recording of statement came to an end or time thereof and leaving space ....
The panchnama with regard to the clothes put on by MUNNA was prepared in the presence of panch witnesses. The dyeing declaration of MUNNA was recorded and he made the arrangement to record the Dyeing Declaration of MUNNA. The postmortem note; the receipt given by the FSL and the opinion given, by FSL in respect of the muddamal further corroborates the prosecution story about the involvement of accused in the commission of offence. If the deposition given by the prosecution witnesses is perused in the proper perspective then the prosecution has proved the involvement of the ....
PW1 Ukandrao Namdeorao Ishwarkar has claimed that when he reached to deceased Chanda when she was being brought by the villagers, she disclosed that she has consumed endrine and upon his enquiry she disclosed that because of the trouble she consumed endrine. It would be useful to reproduce that portion appearing in the evidence of PW1 Ukandrao Namdeorao Ishwarkar, which is reproduced as under : The number of persons who had accompanied at that time is also firmly established on record to the extent of 10 to 15 persons. PW2 Vilas Ukandrao Ishwarkar does not claim that any oral dyein....
( 11 ) DYEING declaration of Jivan Bhoja [original accused no. Statement of Jivan Bhoja being the statement of the accused, was not required to be placed in the papers of the charge-sheet but such statement, when was recorded by independent witness like executive Magistrate, the same ought to have been considered by the investigating officer Shri Kadri, and to show that the investigation is transparent, the person who recorded the statement of Jivan Bhoja ought to have been cited as a witness and the copy thereof also ought to have been provided to the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
