Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
In case of dishonour due to insufficient funds, the act of returning the cheque is completed at the drawee bank’s location, reaffirming that the drawee bank acts independently of the presenting bank's agency role ["Prabhu Dayal Modi v. M/s. Euro Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Another - Bombay"], ["SHAMSUDDIN S/O YUSUFALI vs WAMAN S/O GOPALRAO RAUT AND OTHERS - Bombay"].
Analysis and Conclusion
In the world of commercial transactions, cheques remain a cornerstone despite the rise of digital payments. A common misconception arises: does the drawee bank—the bank on which the cheque is drawn—act as an agent of the drawer (the cheque issuer) when transferring funds? Many seek judgments affirming this, but Indian courts consistently hold otherwise. This post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from key cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), to clarify the drawee bank's true role.
Whether you're a business owner, banker, or legal professional, understanding this distinction is crucial for avoiding disputes over cheque dishonour, liability, and jurisdiction.
The query often posed is: Give me a judgement that says in cheque transactions, the drawee bank acts as an agent of the drawer when transferring funds. Contrary to this expectation, no such judgment exists. Instead, precedents emphasize that the drawee bank functions primarily as a payer, honoring the cheque based on its apparent tenor and endorsements, not as an agent verifying the drawer's instructions beyond standard diligence.
Payment in due course discharges the bank from liability to the true owner, even if the endorsement was unauthorized, absent fraud or negligence. BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354
This position protects banks from undue scrutiny while upholding the efficiency of cheque clearing.
The drawee bank's duty is to pay according to the cheque's apparent authority and endorsements presented. It is not an agent of the drawer in the traditional sense but acts on the instructions conveyed by the instrument itself. BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354
As one judgment notes: Payment of a cheque in due course discharges the drawee bank from liability to the true owner of the cheque, even if the endorsement on the cheque was unauthorized.BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354
The bank pays in good faith, relying on the face value and endorsements, without probing deeper unless negligence is evident.
Courts clarify: The bank’s role is primarily that of a payer, not an agent of the drawer.BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354 A payee's banker is not a ‘drawee’ but acts as an agent of the payee. Crompton Greaves Ltd. VS Shivam Traders, Thane - Current Civil Cases (2009)
This underscores that the drawee bank follows the cheque's instructions independently, discharging liability upon valid payment.
Contrastingly, the collecting bank (where the payee deposits the cheque) acts explicitly as the agent of the payee or holder. Multiple rulings affirm this:
It can in law be reckoned as only the conduct of the principal entrusting the cheque to his agent to present the same before the drawee Bank... the collecting Bank under law can be reckoned only as the agent of the complainant to present the cheque before the drawee Bank.Santhosh Kumar VS MohananSanthosh Kumar VS Mohanan - 2008 Supreme(Ker) 789M. S. Santhoshkumar VS K. G. Mohanan - 2008 Supreme(Ker) 344
When the collecting bank presents the cheque to the drawee bank, it acts as an agent of the holder of the cheque and not as an agent of the drawer of the cheque.Crompton Greaves VS Shri KantibhaiCrompton Greaves Limited VS Kantibhai, Prop. Mahavir - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 837
The drawee bank and collecting bank do not become agents of the drawer; the latter merely facilitates presentation. SHAMSUDDIN S/O YUSUFALI vs WAMAN S/O GOPALRAO RAUT AND OTHERSSHAMSUDDIN S/O YUSUFALI vs WAMAN S/O GOPALRAO RAUTSHAMSUDDIN S/O YUSUFALI vs WAMAN S/O GOPALRAO RAUT AND OTHERSSHAMSUDDIN S/O YUSUFALI vs WAMAN S/O GOPALRAO RAUT AND OTHERS
This agency distinction profoundly impacts territorial jurisdiction for cheque dishonour complaints. Section 138 requires presentation to the drawee bank, not just any bank.
Key holdings:- Presentation to the drawee bank confers jurisdiction; the collecting bank's location does not. The presentation of the cheque to the drawee bank alone confers jurisdiction under Section 138.M. S. Santhoshkumar VS K. G. Mohanan - 2008 Supreme(Ker) 344- Payee's bank acts merely as an agent for presentation; no cause of action arises there. N. Santhi Lakshmi VS State of A. P.N. Santhi Lakshmi VS State of A. P. , rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P. - 2012 Supreme(AP) 184- A combined reading of Sections 3, 72 and 138 of the Act would leave no doubt... the cheque to be presented at the bank on which it is drawn.N. Santhi Lakshmi VS State of A. P.
In Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd. v. Jayaswals Neco Ltd., 'the bank' means the drawee bank, overruling broader interpretations. Courts at the collecting bank's location lack jurisdiction unless other acts (e.g., drawing or notice) occurred there. Rohit Motors VS Punjab Tractors Ltd. - 2010 Supreme(J&K) 120
Good faith payment per apparent tenor absolves the drawee bank. However, liability arises if:- Negligence in handling (e.g., lost cheques). State Bank of Indore VS National Textile Corporation - 2004 Supreme(MP) 720- Payment beyond authority or post-dishonour.
The drawee of a cheque having sufficient funds... must pay the cheque when duly required so to do, and, in default... must compensate the drawer.State Bank of Indore VS National Textile Corporation - 2004 Supreme(MP) 720
Banks aren't liable for forged endorsements if acting prudently. The endorsement by an authorized person binds the principal. BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354
To navigate cheque transactions effectively:- Drawers: Ensure sufficient funds and monitor accounts.- Payees: Present cheques promptly to the drawee via collecting bank (your agent).- Banks: Honor apparent tenor; document diligence to defend against claims.- File Section 138 complaints at courts with drawee bank jurisdiction.
In summary, the drawee bank does not act as an agent of the drawer but as an independent payer in cheque transactions. Supported by cases like BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354 and Crompton Greaves Ltd. VS Shivam Traders, Thane - Current Civil Cases (2009), this protects banking efficiency. The collecting bank, as payee's agent, handles presentation—reinforcing jurisdiction at the drawee. Santhosh Kumar VS Mohanan
Key Takeaways:- Drawee bank: Payer, discharges on good faith payment. BHUTORIA TRADING CO. LTD. VS ALLAHABAD BANK LTD. - 1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 354- Collecting bank: Agent of holder/payee. Crompton Greaves VS Shri Kantibhai- Jurisdiction: Drawee bank's location primary for NI Act offences.- Exceptions: Negligence triggers liability.
This post provides general insights based on precedents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific cases.
Stay informed on evolving NI Act interpretations to safeguard your transactions.
#ChequeLaw, #BankingLaw, #NIACT
It only acts as an agent of the payee and presents the cheque to the drawee bank, which is expected to clear the cheque and make the payment; If the funds are insufficient or arrangement is not made with the drawee bank, the cheque will be dishonoured by the drawee bank and then, the cheque is returned ... Practice of presenting a cheque to pay....
drawee bank and the bank with whom cheque is deposited by the payee does not become the agent of the cheque is deposited only acts as an agent of payee the drawee bank. ... at the drawee bank or the collecting bank of the payee.
drawee bank and the bank with whom cheque is deposited by the payee does not become the agent of the cheque is deposited only acts as an agent of payee the drawee bank. ... at the drawee bank or the collecting bank of the payee.
drawee bank and the bank with whom cheque is deposited by the payee does not become the agent of the cheque is deposited only acts as an agent of payee the drawee bank. ... at the drawee bank or the collecting bank of the payee.
drawee bank and the bank with whom cheque is deposited by the payee does not become the agent of the cheque is deposited only acts as an agent of payee the drawee bank. ... at the drawee bank or the collecting bank of the payee.
It can in law be reckoned as only the conduct of the principal entrusting the cheque to his agent to present the same before the drawee Bank. ... In principle also, no other stand appears to be possible as the collecting Bank under law can be reckoned only as the agent of the complainant to present the cheque before the drawee Bank. ... Sibi and hold that there shall be jurisdiction at the venue where the complainant handed over his....
It can in law be reckoned as only the conduct of the principal entrusting the cheque to his agent to present the same before the drawee bank. ... In principle also, no other stand appears to be possible as the collecting bank under law can be reckoned only as the agent of the complainant to present the cheque before the drawee bank. ... Sibi and hold that there shall be jurisdiction at the venue where the complainant handed over his....
It can in law be reckoned as only the conduct of the principal entrusting the cheque to his agent to present the same before the drawee bank. ... In principle also, no other stand appears to be possible as the collecting bank under law can be reckoned only as the agent of the complainant to present the cheque before the drawee bank. ... Sibi and hold that there shall be jurisdiction at the venue where the complainant handed over his....
Liability of drawee of cheque.- The drawee of a cheque having sufficient funds of the drawer in his hands properly applicable to the payment of such cheque must pay the cheque when duly required so to do, and, in default of such payment, must compensate the drawer for any loss or damage caused by such ... It may also be pertinent to mention here, that the Drawee of cheques had made attempts to secure fresh cheques ....
The drawee of the cheque or holder in due course may present the cheque for collection at any place in the country and if such presentation before Collecting Bank is held to give jurisdiction to the Court where Collecting Bank is situated, it shall have disastrous consequences for the drawer of the cheque ... even when the cheque is dishonored and the drawee or the holder in due course informed by the Ban....
The cheque is returned unpaid at the branch of the drawee bank on which cheque is drawn. When the collecting bank presents the cheque to the drawee bank, it acts an agent of the holder of the cheque and not as an agent of the drawer of the cheque. Where however the balance in the account of the drawer is inadequate, the drawee bank would return the cheque unpaid to the collecting bank, the cheque is returned and delivered to the collecting bank there and then or through the clearing house in the same town, in the ordinary course. The return of the cheque by the drawee bank ....
When the collecting bank presents the cheque to the drawee bank, it acts an agent of the holder of the cheque and not as an agent of the drawer of the cheque. Where however the balance in the account of the drawer is inadequate, the drawee bank would return the cheque unpaid to the collecting bank; the cheque is returned and delivered to the collecting bank there and then or through the clearing house in the same town, in the ordinary course. The return of the cheque by the drawee bank to the collecting bank is thus a return of the cheque to the agent of the holder of the c....
The return of the cheque by the drawee bank to the collecting bank is thus a return of the cheque to the agent of the holder of the cheque. When the collecting bank presents the cheque to the drawee bank, it acts an agent of the holder of the cheque and not as an agent of the drawer of the cheque. Where however the balance in the account of the drawer is inadequate, the drawee bank would return the cheque unpaid to the collecting bank, the cheque is returned and delivered to the collecting bank there and then or through the clearing house in the same town, in the ordinary c....
Act brings out that in order to attract penal provisions of Section 138 of the N.I. Act a cheque is required to be presented for encashment to the drawee Bank and that the payee Bank acts merely as an agent of the payee/complainant for the purposes of presenting the cheque in question to the drawee Bank. The necessary corollary thereof is that no part of cause of action for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act brings out that in order to attract penal provisions of Section 138 of the N.I. Act arises in the Court within the local limits of which the colle....
Act a cheque is required to be presented for encashment to the drawee Bank and that the payee Bank acts merely as an agent of the payee/complainant for the purposes of presenting the cheque in question to the drawee Bank. Act brings out that in order to attract penal provisions of Section 138 of the N.I.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
