Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Courts should avoid rushing or superficial recording, ensuring the process is thorough, especially in sensitive matrimonial and family disputes, to uphold justice and prevent future challenges ["Sikha Saha Gupta VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"] ["DEEPAK KUMAR vs SURJAN SINGH & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Sumana Paruchuri, D/o. Sri N. Venkat Rao VS Jakka Vinod Kumar Reddy, S/o. Late Jakka Narasimha Reddy, - Telangana"]- ["Gursewak Singh VS Baldev Singh - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Leela Devi W/o Late Shri Chain Sukh Ji Bohra VS Amar Chand S/o Shri Rajmal Ji Bohra - Rajasthan"]- ["SHEMEERA, D/O KHADER KUNJU VS SHANI, PUTHEN VEEDU, EDAVANASSERY MURI - 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 182"]- ["SANJAI SHUKLA VS GEETA SHUKLA - 2018 0 Supreme(All) 1518"]- ["Surma VS Santra - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["DEEPAK KUMAR vs SURJAN SINGH & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Somashekaraiah, S/o Late Puttanna VS Parvathamma, W/o Somashekaraiah - Karnataka"]- ["Majjige Nagarajappa VS Kotramma @ Veerabasamma - Karnataka"]- ["Sikha Saha Gupta VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"]
In family law proceedings, where emotions run high and stakes involve personal lives, procedural fairness is paramount. A critical question arises: while recording the memorandum of substance the family courts have to be careful. This issue centers on Section 15 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, which mandates a summary yet careful approach to witness evidence. Mishandling this can lead to miscarriages of justice, appeals, and undermined credibility assessments. This post explores the legal obligations, safeguards, and best practices for Family Courts to ensure natural justice prevails.
Under Section 15, Family Courts must record a memorandum of the substance of a witness's deposition, signed by both the witness and the judge, forming part of the record. This is not a verbatim transcript but a concise summary demanding utmost care for accuracy and fairness. Courts typically mandate oral examination for factual witnesses, allow cross-examination, and prefer assessing demeanor in open court unless parties consent otherwise. AMAN LOHIA VS KIRAN LOHIA - 2021 3 Supreme 260SANJAI SHUKLA VS GEETA SHUKLA - 2018 0 Supreme(All) 1518Rinku Biswas VS Dilip Biswas - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 205
Failure to follow these steps risks invalidating evidence, as seen in cases where affidavits were improperly used for substantive proof or cross-examination was denied. This aligns with the Act's summary yet adjudicatory nature, balancing efficiency with justice. ARVIND KUMAR VERMA VS SUMAN - 1995 0 Supreme(All) 270
Family Courts must distinguish between evidence types and adhere to strict protocols:
These steps prevent truncating testimony and uphold CPC principles via Section 10. AMAN LOHIA VS KIRAN LOHIA - 2021 3 Supreme 260
Section 15 states: it shall not be necessary to record the evidence of witnesses at length, but the Judge... shall, record or cause to be recorded, a memorandum of the substance of what the witness deposes, and such memorandum shall be signed by the witness and the Judge and shall form part of the record.SANJAI SHUKLA VS GEETA SHUKLA - 2018 0 Supreme(All) 1518 This summary method requires vigilance to capture essentials without omission.
In one ruling, courts clarified that while lengthier recording isn't prohibited, the memorandum suffices if properly done. Roshan Lal VS State of Haryana - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 2919 However, the judge's prerogative is exclusive: It is the prerogative of the Judge and the Judge alone of the Family Court to record a memorandum of the substance of what the witness deposes which cannot be exercised by an Advocate Commissioner.SHEMEERA vs SHANI - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 68919
Denying cross-examination, particularly to unrepresented parties (often women), constitutes a gross miscarriage of justice. No opportunity was given to the opposite party to cross-examine the witnesses... resulted in gross miscarriage of justice.Rinku Biswas VS Dilip Biswas - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 205 Family Courts must assist vulnerable litigants, applying CPC fully for pleadings, issues, and reasoned decisions. AMAN LOHIA VS KIRAN LOHIA - 2021 3 Supreme 260
Relatedly, in maintenance petitions under CrPC Section 125, affidavits are permissible but witnesses must face cross-examination. Provisions of Section 15 and 16 of Family Courts Act do not render evidence taken on affidavits to be illegal but a witness has to be subjected to cross-examination.Roshan Lal VS State of Haryana - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 2919 Courts must remove chaff from the grain in matrimonial disputes where claims are often exaggerated. Roshan Lal VS State of Haryana - 2018 Supreme(P&H) 2919
Firsthand evaluation is crucial for sensitive issues like cruelty. Delegation via commissioner requires consent: The Family Court shall have the evidence of the witnesses recorded by the Advocate Commissioner... only if either parties to the lis have no objection.SHEMEERA, D/O KHADER KUNJU VS SHANI, PUTHEN VEEDU, EDAVANASSERY MURI - 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 182Biswajit Dey VS State of Assam - 2012 0 Supreme(Gau) 1186 Without it, proceedings must occur before the face of the Court.
While strict, exceptions exist with caveats:
Note that memorandum in family settlements differs—it records past transactions without needing registration if acknowledging pre-existing rights. Hasu Bai D/o Late Shri Bhagwan VS Lotan S/o Late Shri Bhagwan Mali - 2024 Supreme(MP) 512 This context highlights careful terminology in family proceedings.
To avoid reversals:1. Summon factual witnesses orally and reject core-fact affidavits.2. Offer and record cross-examination waivers explicitly.3. Note demeanor in memoranda.4. Default to in-court recording absent mutual consent.5. Use tape-recording if needed for accuracy. SHEMEERA vs SHANI - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 68919
Counselors' reports under Kerala Rules must avoid exhaustive narrations breaching confidentiality (Rule 29), usable cautiously. Karunakaran. M VS Vasanthi K. - 2009 Supreme(Ker) 117
Family Courts embody a conciliatory yet fair mandate. Careful memorandum recording under Section 15 safeguards credibility, prevents procedural lapses, and upholds justice. Litigants should insist on these rights; courts, adhere diligently.
Key Takeaways:- Prioritize oral exams and cross-examination for facts.- Judge-led recording ensures demeanor insight.- Affidavits limited to formal evidence.
This post provides general insights based on judicial precedents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Subject to such rules, the use of videoconferencing must be left to the careful exercise of discretion of the Family Court in each case. 61.10. ... The High Courts will be well advised to formulate rules to guide the process. The Family Courts must encourage the use of technology to facilitate speedy and effective solutions. ... The High Courts will be well advised to formulate rules to guide the process. The Family Courts must encourage the use of t....
On a careful perusal of the settlement deed dated 14.09.1968, it is evident that with the intervention of the relatives and the Panchayat, the land had already been divided by way of family settlement. ... Thus, it was in the form of memorandum of family settlement and no right for the first time was created by the aforesaid family settlement. It may be noted here that in Kale and others v. ... On a careful reading of both the documents (i.e. memoranda of settlement), it becomes clear ....
Courts will find no difficulty in giving assent to the same. ... The plaintiff claimed the document dated 09.09.1994 as memorandum of family settlement. Plaintiff's case is that earlier partition took place in the life time of the father of the parties on 25.10.1992 which was recorded as memorandum of family settlement on 09.09.1994. ... Therefore, the court finds substance in the argument made by the learned counsel Mr. G.P. ... There are more than one reasons due to which we are of t....
P-6 was merely a memorandum of a family settlement so arrived at. ... In the aforesaid suit, the case is at the stage of recording of evidence of the respondents/defendants, and on 17.2.2021, when the respondents’/defendants’ witness was being examined, at that time, a document dated 29.4.1991 was sought to be exhibited by the defendants claiming the same to be a memorandum ... P-6 was nothing but a memorandum of a family settlement. The established facts and circumstances clearly esta....
settlement is recording a past transaction and, therefore, memorandum of family settlement is also without any substance because the a memorandum. ... Still further, on careful reading of the aforesaid settlement, it is family settlement, however, the Court cannot overlook the statutory bar. ... Hence, he submitted that the judgments passed by the Courts below are erroneous.
- The Court shall prepare a memorandum of the substance what the witness deposes as prescribed under Section 15 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. It is open to the Court to tape record the evidence.” ... It is the prerogative of the Judge and the Judge alone of the Family Court to record a memorandum of the substance of what the witness deposes which cannot be exercised by an Advocate Commissioner. ... 8.The Judge of the Family Cou....
-The Court shall prepare a memorandum of the substance what the witness deposes as prescribed under Section 15 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. It is open to the Court to tape record the evidence.” ... 8. ... It is the prerogative of the Judge and the Judge alone of the Family Court to record a memorandum of the substance of what the witness deposes which cannot be exercised by an Advocate Commissioner. ... The Judge of the Family Court is so given th....
The use of expression ‘it shall not be necessary’ to record the evidence of witnesses at length cannot be read as a prohibition against recording of evidence at length and it cannot be said that in case instead of recording the deposition of witnesses by way of memorandum of the substance, evidence of ... Section 15 deals with record of oral evidence and provides that in suits or proceedings before a Family Court, it shall not be necessary to record the evidence of witnesses at length, but the Judge, ca....
The statement of witness shall be recorded or caused to be recorded in memorandum of substance of what the witness depose as prescribed under Section 15 of the Family Courts Act. ... 8. ... Under Section 15 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 “In suits or proceedings before a Family Court, it shall not be necessary to record the evidence of witnesses at length, but the Judge, as the examination of each witness proceeds, shall, record or cause to be recorded, a m....
The use of expression 'it shall not be necessary' to record the evidence of witnesses at length cannot be read as a prohibition against recording of evidence at length and it cannot be said that in case instead of recording the deposition of witnesses by way of memorandum of the substance, evidence of ... Section 15 deals with record of oral evidence and provides that in suits or proceedings before a Family Court, it shall not be necessary to record the evidence of witnesses at length, but the Judge, ca....
32. A perusal of the above would reveal that the Rule provides that the Court may record only the substance of what the witness deposes in his examination and cross-examination and shall prepare only a memorandum of substance of what the witness deposes in terms of section 15 of the Family Courts Act, 1984. 34. In the cross-examination of the respondent, as noticed hereinbefore, there is no denial of the various allegations made against the appellant in the pleadings, affidavit and complaints. However, the same have been sought to be justified on account of the alleged cond....
The words 'cause to be recorded' clearly indicates delegation of power by a family court judge to a counsellor or even to any other competent authority, who may be known as "Commissioner". Since Section 10 has allowed application of the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure Section 15 of the Act has to be read harmoniously and in juxtaposition with Order 18 Rule 4 of the CPC, which allows cross-examination of witnesses through 'Commissioner'. 15. Under Section 15 of the Act, a Judge of a Family court is permitted to record or cause to be recorded a memorandum of substa....
Considering the importance of the questions, in addition to the counsel appearing forthe parties, I requested the learned counsel Mr. C.S. Dias and Smt. Lekha Suresh to assist me as amicus curiae to resolve the above questions. These questions arise for consideration before me in this case. What are the safe rules which a Counsellor submitting memorandum/report should follow? How and in what manner can Family Courts make use of such memorandum/report?
There were no emergent circumstances warranting learned Judge to prepone the petition on 5/12/2007 and pass an exparte decree. There were no emergent circumstances warranting learned Judge to prepone the petition on 5/12/2007 and pass an exparte decree. Such exparte decrees would destroy the very concept of divorce by mutual consent. Courts have to be careful while passing exparte decrees. Under section 13B of the said Act, only mutual consent gives the court jurisdiction to pass a decree. Under section 13B of the said Act, only mutual consent gi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
