Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Legal Maxims and Doctrine: The maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia means the law does not compel a person to do what is impossible. It is often invoked to establish that a party cannot be held liable or penalized for acts that are impossible to perform ["D. C. M. LTD. VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Subhash Pachori vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Sangita Gupta VS Steel Authority of India Limited - Jharkhand"].
Application in Criminal Law: Courts have recognized this maxim in criminal proceedings, especially when an impossible situation is created or when performance of certain acts is rendered impossible due to legal or factual impediments. For example, courts have considered situations where prosecution or legal obligations cannot be fulfilled because of legal impediments or circumstances beyond control ["D. C. M. LTD. VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Subhash Pachori vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Sangita Gupta VS Steel Authority of India Limited - Jharkhand"].
Prosecution Context: The maxim primarily functions as a defense or a reason for non-compliance, rather than as a tool to aid the prosecution. It is used to argue that an act was impossible, thus negating liability or obligation. For instance, in cases where legal impediments prevent prosecution of a company or individual, courts have applied this maxim to justify non-prosecution ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Crimes"], ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Supreme Court"], ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Crimes"].
Limitations: The maxim does not support the prosecution's case if the act was physically or legally impossible at the time of alleged commission. It is generally a principle for defendants to claim impossibility as a defense, not a basis for prosecution ["Sterling Abraive Ltd. VS Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-8, Ahmedabad - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"], ["Jardine Henderson Limited VS Ramjee Pandit - 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 135"], ["IND_KAR00000014964"].
Court's Role: Courts have emphasized that the maxim helps determine whether legal obligations or acts are feasible. It is not used to facilitate prosecution but to recognize circumstances where enforcement or performance is impossible due to legal or factual barriers ["D. C. M. LTD. VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Subhash Pachori vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Sangita Gupta VS Steel Authority of India Limited - Jharkhand"].
The maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia is primarily a principle supporting defendants by asserting that the law cannot compel impossible acts. Its application in criminal trials mainly serves as a defense mechanism rather than a tool to assist the prosecution. While courts acknowledge the maxim when assessing the impossibility of acts, it generally limits liability or prosecution where impossibility is established. Therefore, it cannot be effectively used by the prosecution side to strengthen their case; instead, it functions to protect defendants from impossible obligations or acts.
References:- ["D. C. M. LTD. VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad"]- ["Subhash Pachori vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Crimes"]- ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Supreme Court"]- ["Anil Gupta VS Star India Pvt. Ltd. - Crimes"]- ["Sterling Abraive Ltd. VS Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-8, Ahmedabad - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal"]- ["Jardine Henderson Limited VS Ramjee Pandit - 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 135"]- ["IND_KAR00000014964"]- ["Sangita Gupta VS Steel Authority of India Limited - Jharkhand"]
In the intricate world of legal proceedings, ancient maxims like lex non cogit ad impossibilia—Latin for the law does not compel the performance of impossibilities—continue to shape modern jurisprudence. But can this principle of equity be wielded by the prosecution to bolster a criminal case? If you're a lawyer, law student, or simply curious about criminal law defenses, understanding its typical role is crucial. This post dives deep into whether lex non cogit ad impossibilia can help the prosecution side in a criminal trial, drawing from established legal findings and case examples.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information based on legal principles and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific cases.
The doctrine lex non cogit ad impossibilia is rooted in principles of equity and natural justice. It holds that the law does not require anyone to do what is impossible Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6. As noted in legal texts, it serves as a rule of caution and not a rule of law that excuses non-performance when circumstances beyond control—such as acts of God or supervening events—render fulfillment unattainable Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6.
This maxim is closely linked to impotentia excusat legem, emphasizing protection against unjust penalization for impossible acts Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6. Typically applied in civil and contractual disputes, its relevance in criminal contexts merits closer examination.
In criminal trials, lex non cogit ad impossibilia predominantly functions as a defense mechanism, not a prosecutorial tool. Courts have consistently ruled that it excuses defendants from liability when performance of a duty becomes impossible due to external factors. For instance:
Key points from judicial interpretations include:- The maxim prevents demanding impossible acts Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.- It applies only to true impossibilities, not mere difficulties Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.- Fault or default by the accused voids its protection Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.
Prosecutors rarely, if ever, invoke it to establish guilt, as it undermines rather than supports the burden of proof Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6.
Directly addressing the core question: No, lex non cogit ad impossibilia is not typically used to aid the prosecution in criminal trials. Legal analyses confirm it acts as a safeguard against unjust penalization, ensuring individuals aren't punished for impossibilities Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6. Courts emphasize it's ill-suited for proving offenses or overcoming evidentiary hurdles Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.
In criminal proceedings, the prosecution must prove elements like actus reus and mens rea beyond reasonable doubt. Invoking impossibility would contradict this by conceding a potential defense, shifting focus away from guilt.
While versatile in civil matters, its criminal application is narrow:- Defensive Exculpation: Supports claims that the accused could not commit the act (e.g., prevented by external events) Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6.- Not Evidentiary: Doesn't help prove intent or feasibility for the prosecution Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.- Burden Remains: Prosecutors must establish facts independently Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.
Beyond core references, various judgments illustrate the maxim's defensive tilt, reinforcing its non-prosecutorial nature.
In a Negotiable Instruments Act case under Sections 138 and 141, the Supreme Court noted: Needless to emphasise, the matter would stand on a different footing where there is some legal impediment and the doctrine of lex non cogit ad impossibilia gets attracted Anil Gupta VS Star India. Here, it excused proceedings against officers absent the company as a party, aiding the defense by highlighting impossibility.
Labour law precedents echo this: One is tempted to reiterate the well settled maxim Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia; the law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform Kiran Devi VS Central Coal Field Ltd. - 2015 Supreme(Jhk) 493. Applied to relax rigid compassionate appointment timelines, it favored claimants over strict enforcement.
Eligibility disputes further demonstrate: In a Jammu & Kashmir recruitment case, the court held, Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia is a famous maxim, which can aptly be applied... The petitioner could not have been expected to produce a degree... when no such degree... could have ever been issued Eshan Pandita VS State of J&K - 2018 Supreme(J&K) 749Eshan Pandita VS State of J&K - 2018 Supreme(J&K) 107. Production Engineering was deemed equivalent to Mechanical, quashing ineligibility—purely protective.
Tax matters align: There is a well known maxim, 'Lex Non Cogit ad impossibilia'... The law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform UFLEX LIMITED VS STATE OF U. P. - 2016 Supreme(All) 1078. Provisions requiring impossible compliance were struck down as irrational.
Even in equity discussions: Maxims like Actus curiae neminem gravabit and Lex non cogit ad impossibilia excused delays from court actions Anil Kumar Khanna VS Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd - 2015 Supreme(Del) 1461. No case repurposes it for prosecution advantage.
These examples—from cheque dishonor Anil Gupta VS Star India, appointments Kiran Devi VS Central Coal Field Ltd. - 2015 Supreme(Jhk) 493, and VAT penalties UFLEX LIMITED VS STATE OF U. P. - 2016 Supreme(All) 1078—show consistent use to excuse or mitigate, never to incriminate.
The maxim isn't absolute:- Self-Caused Impossibility: If due to the party's fault, no relief Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.- Mere Inconvenience: Only genuine legal/physical impossibilities qualify Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.- Prosecutorial Irrelevance: It doesn't bolster cases against the accused Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427.
In summary, lex non cogit ad impossibilia stands as a pillar of fairness, primarily shielding defendants from impossible demands rather than arming prosecutors Industrial Finance Corporation Of India LTD. VS Cannanore Spinning And Weaving Mills LTD. - 2002 3 Supreme 427Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority VS Rajesh Kumar Pandey - 2022 6 Supreme 6. Across civil, criminal, and administrative law, it promotes justice by excusing the inexcusable. While creative arguments may arise, judicial precedent firmly positions it as a rule of caution for the accused.
Key Takeaways:- Excuses non-performance due to true impossibilities.- Defense tool in criminal trials, not prosecution aid.- Linked to equity; fault voids application.
Stay informed on evolving case law, and remember: legal strategies hinge on context.
There are three maxims i.e.”Lex Non Cogit ad impossibilia”, “impotentia Excusat legim” and “neon tenatur ad impossibilia”. Law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform. ... cogit ad impossibilia. ... Jethmalani placed before us a passage from Broom’s Legal Maxims (p. 162), 10th Edn., where the doctrine of impossibility of performance (lex non cogit ad impossibilia) has bee....
Hon’ble Supreme Court in cases where an impossible situation is created has dwelled on doctrine of impossibility by taking note of latin maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia--reported in 2011 (7) SCC 639, it has been held as under:- “39. ... Another legal maxim which can be invoked to their aid is: “Lex non cogit ad impossibilia: the law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform.”17. In Huda and another VS. Dr. Babeswar Kanhar ....
Ltd.,2 (2008) 13 SCC 703, taking note of the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia, two Judge Bench of this Court observed: "54. ... Needless to emphasise, the matter would stand on a different footing where there is some legal impediment and the doctrine of lex non cogit ad impossibilia gets attracted." "53. It is to be borne in mind that Section 141 of the Act is concerned with the offences by the company. ... True interpretation, in my opinion, of t....
Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 703, taking note of the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia, two Judge Bench of this Court observed: "54. ... Needless to emphasise, the matter would stand on a different footing where there is some legal impediment and the doctrine of lex non cogit ad impossibilia gets attracted." ... "53. ... True interpretation, in my opinion, of the said provision would be that a company has to be made an accused but applying the principle of ....
Needless to emphasise, the matter would stand on a different footing where there is some legal impediment and the doctrine of lex non cogit ad impossibilia gets attracted." ... "53. ... Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 703: 2012 (5-6 & 7) SBR 1: 2012 (3) Supreme 416.taking note of the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia, two Judge Bench of this Court observed: "54. ... True interpretation, in my opinion, of the said provision would be that a company has to be ma....
Ltd., 2012 (3) Supreme 416: (2008) 13 SCC 703, taking note of the maxim lex non cogit ad impossibilia, two Judge Bench of this Court observed: “54. ... Needless to emphasise, the matter would stand on a different footing where there is some legal impediment and the doctrine of lex non cogit ad impossibilia gets attracted.” “53. It is to be borne in mind that Section 141 of the Act is concerned with the offences by the company. ... True interpretatio....
One is tempted to reiterate the well settled maxim Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia; the law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform. ... Mr Jethmalani placed before us a passage from Broom’s Legal Maxims (p. 162), 10th Edn., where the doctrine of impossibility of performance (lex non cogit ad impossibilia) has been discussed. ... The maxim of law impotentia excusat legam is intimately connected with another maxim of law #HL_ST....
Ltd., 2003 (56) RLT 465 would lead to a view that even the impossibility of performance of satisfying the MODVAT not availed condition by a recognized and valid Transferee would not entitle them to the benefit of the legal maxim LEX NON COGIT AD IMPOSSIBILIA and following CC (Mumbai) Vs. ... The question is : i) Whether the benefit of legal maxim LEX NON COGIT AND IMPOSSIBILIA would grant the eligibility to the benefit of the DEEC exemption notificat....
non cogit ad impossibilia”. ... The other maxim is, lex non cogit ad impossibilia - the impossibilia” cannot be faulted. ... non cogit ad impossibilia” which means law does not compel a person to short, 'learned trial Court').
non cogit ad impossibilia. ... non cogit ad impossibilia) Cogit Ad Impossibilia; the law does not compel a man to do that which One is tempted to reiterate the well settled maxim Lex Non witnesses turned hostile but informant himself also stated that he did p style="position
Having considered the issue in its entirety and having perused the material on record, it is clear that the Degree in Production Engineering is separate and independent from the Degree in Automobile Engineering. The petitioner could not have been expected to produce a degree for proving his eligibility as regards qualification, when no such degree as degree in “Automobile Production Engineering” could have ever been issued by any university in the Country. Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia is a famous maxim, which can aptly be applied in the present case.
Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia is a famous maxim, which can aptly be applied in the present case. The petitioner could not have been expected to produce a degree for proving his eligibility as regards qualification, when no such degree as degree in “Automobile Production Engineering” could have ever been issued by any university in the Country.
There is a well known maxim, “Lex Non Cogit ad impossibilia” Since neither such provision is capable of read down in such a manner so as to render it rational such a provision which require compliance just impossible, valid law. The law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform. The other similarly recognized legal maxims are “Impotentia Excusat Legim” and “neon tenatur ad impossibilia.”
“Actus curiae neminem gravabit” and “Lex non cogit ad impossibilia”. We have to bear in mind two maxims of equity which are well settled, namely, “ACTUS CURIAE NEMINEM GRAVABIT” – The Supreme Court in Raj Kumar Dey vs. Tarapada Dey, (1987) 4 SCC 398 explained the above maxims as follows: “6.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
