Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Redeemable Preference Shares - Structuring redemption at a specific time with a higher price than the purchase price is generally permissible under Malaysian company law, provided the terms are clearly stipulated and comply with statutory provisions. For example, sections referencing redemption specify that shares can be redeemed out of profits, a fresh issue of shares, or capital of the company ["Kamal Karmakar VS S Chand And Company Limited - Delhi"] ["Kamal Karmakar Walldorf Integration Solutions Limited vs S. Chand and Company Limited - Delhi"] ["Puna Ram VS Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. - 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 1504"].
Main Points and Insights:
The law recognizes that redemption at a premium is lawful if it is out of profits, fresh share issues, or capital, and the company's articles authorize such redemption ["Puna Ram VS Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. - 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 1504"] ["Kamal Karmakar VS S Chand And Company Limited - Delhi"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the dynamic world of corporate financing, redeemable preference shares offer companies flexible tools to raise capital while providing investors with predictable returns. But can these shares be structured under Malaysian company law so that the company must redeem them at a specific time and at a price higher than the original purchase price? This question arises frequently among business owners, investors, and legal practitioners navigating the Companies Act 2016.
This blog post delves into the legal framework, key requirements, real-world cases, and practical recommendations. While this provides general insights based on statutory provisions and precedents, it is not legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
Under Malaysian company law, primarily governed by the Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016), companies with share capital may issue preference shares, including redeemable ones, subject to their constitution. Section 72 of the CA 2016 states: Preference shares (1) Subject to its constitution, a company having a share capital may issue preference shares. LEXTREND SDN BHD & ORS vs SOTELLA FUND PTE LTD
Redemption is strictly regulated to protect creditors and maintain capital integrity. Subsection (4) specifies that fully paid-up redeemable shares shall be redeemed only out of:- (a) profits;- (b) a fresh issue of shares; or- (c) capital of the company. LEXTREND SDN BHD & ORS vs SOTELLA FUND PTE LTD
This ensures redemption does not unlawfully deplete company resources. The terms, including timing and price, must align with the company's articles of association and shareholder resolutions. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59
Yes, redeemable preference shares can generally be structured for redemption at a predetermined time and price exceeding the purchase (issue) price, often including a premium, provided they comply with statutory mandates and contractual terms.
The terms—such as exact timing, method, and premium—are typically outlined in the company's constitution, subscription agreements, and special resolutions (e.g., 3/4 majority under relevant provisions). For instance, resolutions must clearly specify these details to be enforceable. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59Auckland International Ltd. , In re VS - Company Law Board (1994)
A practical example: In one subscription agreement, the plaintiff subscribed for 500,000 redeemable convertible cumulative preference shares of RM1.00 each at RM10.00 per share (total RM5,000,000), highlighting how issue prices can exceed par value, and redemption terms may include premiums. Midf Amanah Ventures Sdn Bhd vs Lim Thiam ChyeMIDF AMANAH VENTURES SDN BHD vs LIM THIAM CHYE
Courts have upheld premiums in redemption. In the Auckland International Ltd. case, preference shares were redeemed at a premium of Rs. 447.68/- per share, as per the resolution authorizing replacement with new shares under specified terms. Auckland International Ltd. , In re VS - Company Law Board (1994)
Similarly, schemes of arrangement have sanctioned redemptions at premiums, such as 10% non-cumulative compulsorily redeemable preference shares of Rs.100/- each will be redeemed at a price of Rs.547.68/- per share. In the matter of : Jindal Polymer Products Private Limited VS . - 2016 Supreme(Del) 2782
Redemption must use permissible funds: profits available for dividends, fresh share proceeds, or capital (per CA 2016). Timing is dictated by the terms; for example, put options allow investors to trigger redemption at agreed dates if conditions like unmet dividends are breached. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59LEXTREND SDN BHD & ORS vs SOTELLA FUND PTE LTD
If structured properly, the company is obligated to redeem at the specified premium and time, enforceable via specific performance. Courts have ordered companies to purchase option shares within 14 days upon valid exercise. MIDF AMANAH VENTURES SDN BHD vs LIM THIAM CHYE
Malaysian courts emphasize adherence to both contract and statute, often prioritizing enforceable agreements over financial excuses.
Subscription Agreement Enforcement: In a case under CA 2016 Sections 72, 131, and 132, defendants argued inability to redeem due to lack of profits, but the court rejected this, affirming contractual obligations for redemption and damages. The contractual obligations defined in SA 1 and SA 2 are enforceable irrespective of the defendants' claims of non-compliance with statutory provisions. KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD vs IMPIANA SDN BHD & ANOR
Put Option and Specific Performance: A plaintiff successfully exercised a put option for redeemable shares, with the court granting specific performance: The Defendant is to perform its obligation to purchase the Option Shares within 14 days. MIDF AMANAH VENTURES SDN BHD vs LIM THIAM CHYE
Breach and Recovery: Where dividends were unpaid, investors recovered full investment (e.g., RM 4,104,830) via redemption rights under the agreement. SALIM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD vs SUTRASEGI SDN BHD & ORS
International influences, like Indian precedents under similar Companies Acts, reinforce that redemption at premium is viable via special resolutions, akin to capital reduction if needed. BIRLA GLOBAL FINANCE LIMITED VS . - 2003 Supreme(Bom) 1289NR VS In the matter of section 80 read with sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 - 2003 Supreme(Bom) 1294
These cases show premiums and fixed timings are standard, but breaches—like redeeming without profits—can invalidate the process. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59
While flexible, structures have limits:- Redemption out of capital is allowed but subject to subsections (5) and (6) of CA 2016. LEXTREND SDN BHD & ORS vs SOTELLA FUND PTE LTD- Terms depriving capital unlawfully or violating articles are void. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59- Improper funding leads to invalidity; shareholders/creditors may challenge, requiring repayment or sanctions. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59
In oppression disputes, redeemable shares with premiums (e.g., RM0.10 face at RM1.00 issue) were scrutinized but upheld if compliant. IN THE MATTER OF CHLORIDE EASTERN INDUSTRIES LTD vs .
To structure redeemable preference shares effectively:- Draft Clear Terms: Specify redemption date, price (including premium), and funding source in subscription agreements and resolutions. Auckland International Ltd. , In re VS - Company Law Board (1994)- Ensure Compliance: Pass required majorities, document everything, and verify profits/fresh issues. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59- Legal Review: Confirm alignment with CA 2016 and constitution before issuance.- Investor Protections: Include put/call options, cumulative dividends (e.g., 8% on RM1.10 base), and remedies like specific performance. SALIM INVESTMENTS PTE LTD vs SUTRASEGI SDN BHD & ORS- Monitor Obligations: Companies should prepare funds timely to avoid court orders or winding-up risks. KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD vs IMPIANA SDN BHD & ANOR
Investors: Scrutinize terms and seek recourse promptly if breached.
Malaysian company law permits structuring redeemable preference shares for redemption at specific times and prices higher than purchase, including premiums, as long as statutory funding rules (profits, fresh shares, or capital) and procedural requirements are met. Cases consistently enforce these terms, underscoring contracts' strength.
Key Takeaways:- Premiums and fixed timings are allowable per articles/resolutions. Auckland International Ltd. , In re VS - Company Law Board (1994)- Fund from approved sources to avoid invalidity. Nirmal Chandra VS Vimal Chand - 2001 4 Supreme 59- Courts favor specific performance over financial hardship claims. MIDF AMANAH VENTURES SDN BHD vs LIM THIAM CHYE
For tailored advice, engage a Malaysian corporate lawyer. Stay compliant to leverage these instruments confidently in your financing strategy.
#MalaysianCompanyLaw, #PreferenceShares, #ShareRedemption
higher than the conversion price mentioned in the sub clause (a) above, then the optionally convertible or redeemable preference shares held by Investor shall be converted at such higher rate at which such investment is made by the other person, entity, firm or body Corporate; ... ... The said shares shall have also an option for conversion into equity shares of Rs.10 each at a minimum conversion price of Rs.80 per equity share or ....
the form of Equity Shares at a rate higher than the conversion price mentioned in the sub clause (a) above, then the optionally convertible or redeemable preference shares held by Investor shall be converted at such higher rate at which such investment is made by the other person, entity, firm or body ... The said shares shall have also an option for conversion into equity shares of Rs.10 each at a minimum conversion price of Rs.80 per equity #HL_STA....
By the Subscription Agreement the Plaintiff agreed to subscribe for 500,000 redeemable convertible cumulative preference shares of RM1.00 each in the share capital of BHSB (the Subscription Shares) at a subscription price of RM10.00 only for each share and the total subscription price of RM5,000,000.00 ... the 500,000 redeemable convertible cumulative preference shares in the share capital of BHSB held by the Plaintiff in accordance....
By the Subscription Agreement the Plaintiff agreed to subscribe for 500,000 redeemable convertible cumulative preference shares of RM1.00 each in the share capital of BHSB (the Subscription Shares) at a subscription price of RM10.00 only for each share and the total subscription price of RM5,000,000.00 ... At the date of the issuance of the Put Option Notice - (i) the Defendant had not exercised the Call Option under the Put and Call Option Agreement; and (ii) no notice had been given ....
Preference shares (1) Subject to its constitution, a company having a share capital may issue preference shares. (2) ...... (3) ...... ... (4) Subject to subsections (5) and (6), the shares shall be redeemable only if the shares are fully paid up and the redemption shall be out of: (a) profits; (b) a fresh issue of shares; or (c) capital of the company." ... [6] By a Share Subscription Agreement dated 21 December 2016 (SSA), Sotel....
If they fail there are three remedies to the preference shareholder: equity can compel them to do so by an order for specific performance; common law can award damages; and company law can order them to be wound up. If damages are awarded they must come from profits or fresh share issue. ... preference shares ("RPS 1") at an issue price of RM1.00 per RPS. ... preference shares ("RPS 2") at an issue price of RM1.00 ....
as fully paid-up and that the authorised share capital of the company be increased to Rs. 1,75,00,000 by creation of further cumulative redeemable preference shares of Rs. 10 each and that the directors shall have the authority to issue further redeemable preference shares equal to the amounts of the ... The purchase price shall be negotiated by the company with the shareholder and the considerati....
5.6 The Company shall pay to the Subscriber, fixed preferential cumulative dividends in respect of the SI Preference Shares at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum based on RM1.10 per SI preference Share, which dividend shall be paid in preference to any dividend over the ordinary shares of ... If they fail there are three remedies to the preference shareholder: equity can compel them to do so by an order for specific....
Nature of Instrument: Preference 'B' Shares - Redeemable, Non-Cumulative Convertible - face value of RM0.10 per share. 3. Amount: RM2,500,000 (including premium). 4. Issue Price: RM0.10 per share at a premium of RM0.90 per share. 5. ... Value of these preference shares for the purpose of conversion shall be considered at RM1 per share. 8. ... The facts and the law do not seem to show a continuing state of oppressio....
Nature of Instrument: Preference 'B' Shares - Redeemable, Non-Cumulative Convertible - face value of RM0.10 per share. 3. Amount: RM2,500,000 (including premium). 4. Issue Price: RM0.10 per share at a premium of RM0.90 per share. 5. ... Value of these preference shares for the purpose of conversion shall be considered at RM1 per share. 8. ... The facts and the law do not seem to show a continuing state of oppressio....
So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee company shall issue and allot shares to the shareholders of the transferor companies no. 1 shall issue and allot shares to the shareholders of the transferee company in the following ratio: “72 10% non-cumulative compulsorily redeemable preference shares of Rs.100/-each of Transferor Company No.1, credited as fully paid up, for every 100 equity shares of Rs.10/-each held in the Transferee Company. 1 & 2 in the following ratio: “22 10% non-cumulative comp....
1 & 2 in the following ratio: “22 10% non-cumulative compulsorily redeemable preference shares of Rs.100/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 1000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each held in the transferor company no. “19 10% non-cumulative compulsorily redeemable preference shares of Rs.100/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 1000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 2. 10% non-cumulative compulsory redeemable preference shares of Rs.100/- each will be redeemed at a price of Rs.547.68/- per share [Rs....
The Board of Directors of HQRL approved the allotment on 5th May, 2003 subject to the condition that the allotment did not carry any voting rights. This was followed (in July 2003) by a further purchase of 4,64,290 preference shares by Hill Crest Realty on similar terms. were amended to state that preference shares would not carry any voting rights. Hill Crest Realty (a Malaysian company) purchased 23,65,000 redeemable preference shares from HQRL bearing interest at 8.5% per annum.
Thus, the equity share capital as well as the preference share capital of a company can be reduced in any way, if authorised by the articles, by a special resolution of the company subject to sanction of the Court. The preference share capital of a company is generally redeemable and after introduction of section 80A by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 even irredeemable shares issued prior to the amendment are made redeemable and have to be redeemed by the company within the time prescribed therein. It is for this reason that permission of the Court is not made necessary....
The preference share capital of a company is generally redeemable and after introduction of section 80-A by the companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 even irredeemable shares issued prior to the amendment are made redeemable and have to be redeemed by the company within the time prescribed therein. Thus, the equity share capital as well as the preference share capital of a company can be reduced in any way, if authorised by the articles, by a special resolution of the company subject to sanction of the Court. It is for this reason that permission of the Court is not made necessa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
