Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Absence of X-ray Reports - Several sources emphasize that without the production of X-ray reports, the injuries noted in the MLC (Medico-Legal Case) cannot be conclusively classified as grievous or grievous injuries cannot be confirmed. For instance, ["Kanhaiya Lal VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"] states, no such x-ray report... has been produced on record and in the lack of x-ray report, it could not be deemed that the injuries... were grievous in nature. Similarly, ["GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417"] mentions, no one could be treated to be sufficient to cause death of the human being in the ordinary course of the nature without X-ray evidence. This indicates that the value of MLC alone, without corroborative X-ray reports, is limited in establishing grievous injury or fracture.
X-ray Reports Confirming Fractures - When X-ray reports are available, they serve as crucial evidence for confirming fractures and assessing injury severity. Examples include ["Sobhagmal Jain VS M P Financial Corporation - Madhya Pradesh"], which reports a fracture of the ulna bone in the right hand of victim Krishna Kumar Mishra, stating, Fracture upper end right Ulna, and notes that except the fracture... no other injury could be treated to be grievous. Likewise, ["Ram Kumar Pathak VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"] reports fractures of the right tibia and both forearms, with the opinion that the injury was grievous, supported by X-ray evidence.
Nature of Injuries and Their Grievousness - Several sources clarify that only fractures confirmed by X-ray are considered grievous injuries under law. For example, ["RAM KUMAR PATHAK vs GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"] states, the fracture of right tibia bone, as grievous injury. Conversely, injuries described as simple or superficial in the absence of X-ray evidence are generally regarded as non-grievous, as in ["GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417"], where injuries without X-ray confirmation are deemed simple.
Legal Implication of X-ray Evidence - The presence or absence of X-ray reports impacts legal classification of injuries. Several sources, such as ["RAM KUMAR PATHAK vs GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"], emphasize that without the X-ray report, the injury cannot be definitively classified as grievous, and the signature of the radiologist and doctor on the reports is often considered crucial evidence.
Expert Testimony and Document Authentication - Courts have upheld the admissibility of X-ray reports when properly proved, with signatures of the radiologist and doctor, as in ["Ram Kumar Pathak VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"], where the signature of the Doctor who prepared the MLC and the Radiologist who prepared the X-Ray report have been proved. However, the absence of such reports or signatures diminishes the evidentiary value, leading courts to treat injuries as simple unless confirmed by X-ray.
Analysis and Conclusion:The value of Medical Legal Certificates (MLC) suggesting fractures without accompanying X-ray reports is limited. Without radiological evidence, injuries are often classified as simple or non-grievous, regardless of clinical opinion. When X-ray reports are available and confirm fractures, they significantly strengthen the case for grievous injury classification, which has legal implications, especially under sections like 320 of the Indian Penal Code. Therefore, in the absence of X-ray reports, courts tend to treat injuries as less severe, and the mere mention of fracture in MLC alone is insufficient to establish grievousness conclusively ["Kanhaiya Lal VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh"], ["GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417"], ["Ram Kumar Pathak VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"].
In personal injury cases, especially those involving assaults or accidents, the Medico-Legal Certificate (MLC) plays a crucial role. But what happens when an MLC suggests a fracture without an accompanying X-ray report? This is a common question in Indian courts: what is the value of MLC suggesting fracture without X-ray report?
Generally, such an MLC holds limited evidentiary value. Courts typically require radiological confirmation to substantiate fracture claims, particularly when determining if an injury qualifies as 'grievous hurt' under Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Without X-rays, the assertion may be downgraded to a simple injury, impacting charges, convictions, and compensation. This post breaks down the legal stance, key judgments, and practical implications.
Medical certificates like MLCs provide initial observations, but fractures aren't always detectable through clinical examination alone. Courts emphasize that radiological evidence (X-ray plates and reports) is indispensable to prove a fracture definitively.
As held in one judgment: No opinion regarding injury No. 3 was given in such report. It was stated that after carrying out the x-ray, the opinion regarding this injury could be given. Undisputedly, no x-ray plate or x-ray report regarding this victim was either filed or proved on record. Without it, the above injury could only be treated as simple in the absence of X-ray evidence Basant Kumar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2009 0 Supreme(MP) 1105.
Similarly: In the absence of sufficient proof of x-ray plate and x-ray report regarding fracture, the fracture of the bone could not be inferred GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417.
This principle ensures reliability, as clinical suggestions can be subjective, while X-rays offer objective proof.
Judges view MLCs claiming fractures skeptically without backups. For instance: The fact of existence of fracture cannot be diagnosed and certified in absence of proof of x-ray plates, unless the fact of fractured bones was perceivable barely of perception by naked eyes and sheerly by clinical examination GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417.
In another case: In such premises, the nature of this injury could be treated only simple (for claimed fractures sans X-ray) Basant Kumar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2009 0 Supreme(MP) 1105. And: No doubt, there cannot be a presumption that the grievous hurt was caused without formal proof of the fact of fracture. The fact of existence of fracture cannot be diagnosed and certified in absence of proof of x-ray plates S. Mahaboob Basha VS State of Karnataka - 2014 0 Supreme(SC) 1056.
These rulings underscore that MLCs alone rarely suffice for serious classifications.
Numerous judgments reinforce this. In Achhelal Choudhary VS State of M. P. - 2011 Supreme(MP) 1327, the court noted only fractures confirmed by X-ray qualified as grievous: In view of this X-ray report on examining the case at hand, it is apparent that except the fracture of aforesaid Ulna bone, no any other injury could be treated to be grievous...
Similarly, RAM KUMAR PATHAK vs GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI highlighted: Dr.Dheeraj had given an opinion as per the MLC; X-ray report regarding the fracture of right tibia bone, as grievous injury. The X-ray elevated the MLC's claim.
In ROOP SINGH VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 Supreme(MP) 1422, X-ray confirmed a metacarpal fracture, distinguishing it from simple injuries: As per X-ray report given by the radiologist, he sustained the fracture of 1st metacarpal of his right hand.
Contrastingly, Ragho Mahra VS State of Jharkhand - 2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1006 dismissed unproven fractures: Therefore, nothing is indicated regarding fracture by the X-ray report... no X-ray plate was exhibited to show the kind or nature or size of fracture.
Even in Shakuntla vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 55072, an MLC advising X-ray without negative results left room for doubt: for three injuries, X-ray examination was advised and no document has been placed on record... to suggest that the X-ray report was negative.
These cases show courts pivot on X-rays for charge framing, like altering Section 307 (attempt to murder) to 325 (grievous hurt) based on verified fractures Achhelal Choudhary VS State of M. P. - 2011 Supreme(MP) 1327.
Rarely, if a fracture is 'palpable and visibly evident' through naked eye or clinical exam, courts may consider it without X-ray—but this is exceptional and not for contested grievous hurt claims. Most rulings demand confirmation.
For example, Sarathi Bala Barman and Anr. W/o Sri Rameswar Barman vs State Of Assam - 2025 Supreme(Gau) 418 noted: (b) Fracture on left Ulnar bone as per X-ray report, tying grievous status to radiology. Without it, tenderness or contusions remain simple.
In Lalit @ Montu VS State - 2017 Supreme(Del) 1005, the orthopaedic specialist proved MLC and X-ray, confirming forearm fracture—highlighting proper evidence's strength.
The value of an MLC suggesting fracture without X-ray is minimal in court—typically inadmissible for proving grievous hurt. Backed by consistent judgments Basant Kumar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2009 0 Supreme(MP) 1105GULAB VS STATE OF M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 1417S. Mahaboob Basha VS State of Karnataka - 2014 0 Supreme(SC) 1056, radiological evidence is the gold standard. This protects against exaggerations while ensuring justice.
This post provides general insights based on reported cases and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
#MLCFracture #XRayEvidence #GrievousHurt
It is also apparent from the list of the document mentioned in the Police Report filed under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. that no such x-ray report, showing that any of the aforesaid victims sustained any fracture, has been produced on record. ... So in the lack of x-ray report, it could not be deemed that the injuries referred for x-ray were grievous in nature. The same should be treated to be simple in nature. ... Initially without awaiting for the #HL_S....
Advised x-ray for other injuries. Patient referred to district hospital. ... (B) As per MLC report victim Ramdhani sustained following injuries :- (1). ... Under advise, on carrying-out the X-ray of victim K.K. Mishra, the following report was given by the radiologist :- (1) Skull AP/Lat : No bony injury seen. (2) Right Arm AP/Lat : Fracture upper end right Ulna. ... In view of this x-ray report on examining the case at hand, it is apparent that exc....
The X-ray report which is Ex.PW.9/A reveals that there was a fracture of the right tibia and fracture of both the forearms. No fracture was seen in the thigh region. ... 19. ... Dr.Dheeraj had given an opinion as per the MLC; X-ray report regarding the fracture of right tibia bone, as grievous injury. ... 10. Dr.Nishu Dhawan (PW.2) has further testified to the fact that Dr. Aarti Soni and Dr. ... The contentions of the appellant tha....
However, she fairly stated that in the MLC report as well as the x-ray report whatsoever injuries and fracture are stated, no one could be treated to be sufficient to cause death of the human being in the ordinary course of the nature and prayed to decide this revision accordingly. ... Before proceeding further, I would like to reproduce the injuries of the victims stated by the doctor in their respectively MLC report as well as in the X-ray #HL_STAR....
Advised X-ray for other injuries. Patient referred to district hospital. ... (B) As per MLC report victim Ramdhani sustained following injuries :-- ... (1) Reddish contusion 5 x 3 cm left scapular region. ... In view of this X-ray report on examining the case at hand, it is apparent that except the fracture of aforesaid Ulna bone, no any other injury could be treated to be grievous or sufficient to cause death of the person in ordinary course of the nature. ... Out of them, victim Kris....
It shows that such opinion was given by such doctor only clinically and without examining or observing the x-ray plate. It is settled proposition of law that in the absence of sufficient proof of x-ray plate and x-ray report on record, the fracture of the bone could not inferred. ... As per available record in spite advising to cany out the x-ray by doctor while preparing the pre-MLC report, the x-ray regarding hea....
The signature of Dr.Dheeraj is also appended on the MLC (Ex.PW.2/A). Dr.Dheeraj had given an opinion as per the MLC; X-ray report regarding the fracture of right tibia bone, as grievous injury. 10. ... The X-ray report which Crl.A. ... The contentions of the appellant that in the absence of the deposition of the Doctor who examined PW.3 and the Radiologist who prepared the report of X-Ray, neither the M....
The signature of Dr.Dheeraj is also appended on the MLC (Ex.PW.2/A). Dr.Dheeraj had given an opinion as per the MLC; X-ray report regarding the fracture of right tibia bone, as grievous injury. 10. ... The contentions of the appellant that in the absence of the deposition of the Doctor who examined PW.3 and the Radiologist who prepared the report of X-Ray, neither the MLC nor the X-Ray report cou....
As per X-ray report given by the radiologist, he sustained the fracture of 1st metacarpal of his right hand. Except the aforesaid injury of fracture, all other injuries were stated by the doctor to be simple in nature. ... After lodging the report, the victims were sent to the hospital where on medical examination their MLC reports were prepared. The victim Amar Singh and Arvind, were advised to carry out the X-ray of some injuries. ... The alleged fracture#....
It has also been argued by the counsel for petitioner that the MLC report of Ajay Mishra prepared at District Hospital, Sidhi, does not suggest the infliction of any grievous injury, but this MLC report annexed at page no.17 with the instant petition reveals that for three injuries, X-ray examination ... was advised and no document has been placed on record by the petitioner to suggest that the X-ray report was negative in nature. ... the earlier MLC....
20. It appears that PW-6, who is the Investigating Officer, deposed in his testimony that after receiving the FIR, he investigated the case and examined the victim as well as other witnesses and accordingly submitted chargesheet. (a) Tenderness present on the left forearm, left arm and left check. (b) Fracture on left Ulnar bone as per X-ray report. 19. It appears that PW-5 opined that injury No.1 is simple and caused by blunt object and injury No.2 is grievous injury caused by blunt object. It appears that on examining Tutu Barman i.e. daughter, she found tenderness on rig....
The X-Ray Report is not accommodate with the X-Ray and the Radiologist/P.W.9 states that there is no fracture. There are exaggerations and embellishments in the evidence of the witnesses. There is no mention how long the deceased was taken treatment as inpatient, further there is no wound certificate produced. In view of the above, the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants under Section 307 IPC., is not sustainable and the same is set aside, but the appellant is found guilty under Section 326 of IPC., and is liable to be convicted.
Therefore, nothing is indicated regarding fracture by the X-ray report. Continuing with the evidence pertaining to the doctor, the learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that no X-ray plate was exhibited to show the kind or nature or size of fracture, so it is not possible to indicate whether the injury or fracture was minor, major or it was a hairline fracture. So the allegations of fracture also should not be taken on its word or that any part of the hand or the bone was broken into two pieces.
11. PW-15 Dr. Hemant Sharma, Specialist Orthopaedic, Aruna Asaf Ali Hospital appeared and proved MLC and X-ray report of Farid Khan. As per the MLC and X-ray report, fracture was found in right forearm of Farid Khan.
Injuries having fracture of radius ulna, left hand, fracture of metacarpal of right hand; X-ray report shows fracture of upper third of shaft of radius and ulna; (iv) Multiple fracture of metacarpal of right hand.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
