Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Jurisdiction of MSME Facilitation Council - The Council's jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes under the MSME Act is limited and specific. Orders passed under Section 18 of the MSME Act can be challenged under Section 19, but only if they qualify as orders under that section. If the dispute involves a registered MSME, the Council generally has jurisdiction, unless the terms of the agreement or specific circumstances exclude it. For instance, in cases where the dispute pertains to works contracts or specific types of orders, the Council may lack jurisdiction Solar Designs Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, A. A. K. Apath Sakaayem VS M. M. C. Doortech Services Private Limited - Madras, Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana, Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, V.K.S. Constructions vs State of Telangana - Telangana.
Order Challenging and Appeal Mechanisms - Orders of the MSME Facilitation Council can be challenged via appeals under Section 37 of the MSME Act or through writ petitions in higher courts, but the scope depends on the nature of the order. Orders passed under Section 16 (which declares jurisdictional issues) are subject to appeal under Section 37, and writ petitions are generally not maintainable against such orders unless specific jurisdictional questions are involved Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana, Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, V.K.S. Constructions vs State of Telangana - Telangana.
Preliminary Jurisdictional Questions - Jurisdictional objections can be raised as preliminary issues, and courts or tribunals are expected to decide these before proceeding with substantive disputes. However, if such objections are not raised timely or are decided late, proceedings may continue without jurisdiction being properly established, leading to orders being set aside or remitted Northroof Ventures Private Limited VS XYNC Structural Solutions Pvt. Ltd. - Karnataka.
Limitations and Scope of Review - An erroneous order can be appealed but not reviewed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, emphasizing that review is limited and cannot serve as a substitute for appeal. In cases where jurisdiction is challenged, courts have held that such objections should be decided at the earliest stage, and failure to do so can render subsequent orders void Docket Care Systems Lko. Thru. Partner Shri Pankaj Kumar Agarwal VS Union of India, Thru. Secy. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, New Delhi - Allahabad, A Bharat Trading Company VS Kanpur Steel and Engineering Works - Chhattisgarh.
Impact of Registration Status - The registration of an MSME after a dispute has arisen does not automatically confer jurisdiction on the Council to entertain disputes. The timing of registration and the nature of the contract are crucial in determining jurisdiction Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana.
Role of Supreme Court and High Courts - The Supreme Court has clarified that disputes involving MSME registration and jurisdiction should be approached with caution, and in some cases, the Court has emphasized that disputes outside the scope of the MSME Act or involving specific contract types (e.g., works contracts) may not fall within the Council's jurisdiction, and such orders are subject to appeal or challenge under other legal provisions Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi, Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana.
The jurisdiction to file an appeal against orders of the MSME Facilitation Council hinges on the nature of the order, the specific provisions of the MSME Act, and whether the order falls within the scope of Sections 16, 18, or 19. Orders passed under Section 16 (which declares lack of jurisdiction) are directly appealable under Section 37, while orders under Section 18 can be challenged through Section 19 applications. Writ petitions are generally not the proper remedy unless jurisdictional issues are involved. Timely raising of jurisdictional objections is critical, as courts have emphasized that such objections should be decided at the earliest, and failure to do so can invalidate subsequent orders. The registration status of MSMEs and the type of dispute (e.g., works contracts) are also decisive factors in determining the Council’s jurisdiction. Overall, appeals against MSME Tribunal or Facilitation Council orders are permissible through statutory appeal mechanisms, primarily under Section 37, or via writ petitions where jurisdictional questions are involved.
Navigating disputes under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSME) Act, 2006, can be complex, especially when it comes to challenging orders from the MSME Facilitation Council (often referred to as the MSME Tribunal). A common question arises: What is the jurisdiction to file an appeal against the order of the MSME Tribunal? This blog post breaks down the legal framework, key provisions, case laws, and practical considerations to help businesses understand their rights and options.
Whether you're a supplier registered under MSME or a buyer facing a council award, knowing the jurisdictional boundaries is crucial. We'll explore the MSME Act, interplay with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and insights from judicial precedents. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The MSME Act provides a specialized mechanism for resolving disputes between buyers and suppliers, primarily through the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. Section 18 of the MSME Act empowers the Council to conduct conciliation and, if it fails, arbitration. However, the Council's jurisdiction is not absolute—it hinges on specific conditions, such as the supplier's registration status at the time of the contract. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - Delhi
If these conditions aren't met, any order passed by the Council may lack legal backing, rendering appeals challenging. The process typically flows from conciliation to arbitration, with awards challengeable under limited grounds.
Under Section 18, the Council can arbitrate disputes only if the supplier is a registered MSME at the time of entering the contract. Post-contract registration does not retroactively confer jurisdiction. As held in relevant cases, the jurisdiction of the Council is limited to disputes involving registered MSMEs. If the supplier is not registered as an MSME at the time of the contract, the Council lacks jurisdiction to entertain the dispute. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - Delhi
This prerequisite is foundational. Without it, the entire proceeding may be void.
Challenges to arbitral awards from the MSME Council fall under Section 19 of the MSME Act, which mandates a 75% pre-deposit of the award amount for setting aside applications. This aligns with Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing courts to set aside awards on grounds like lack of jurisdiction or procedural irregularities.
However, the court’s jurisdiction to entertain such challenges is contingent upon the validity of the arbitration proceedings initiated under the MSME Act. If the Council lacked jurisdiction ab initio, no appeal under Section 34 is maintainable. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - Delhi
From additional precedents: Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent NBCC (India) Limited that the argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent NBCC (India) Limited has to file an application under Section 19 of the MSME Act, 2006 for setting aside the order of the Council, has no merit... because the impugned minutes of the meeting passed by the Council cannot be treated as an order passed under Section 1.... Siotia Steels Limited, represented by its Director Sri Bhagwati Prasad Siotia VS NBCC (India) Limited, (formerly known as National Building Construction Corporation Limited), represented by its Deputy General Manager, HRM and duly authorised Officer - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 854 - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 854
For certain orders, like those under Section 16 declaring lack of jurisdiction, appeals lie directly under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act. Writ petitions may be entertained by High Courts only for pure jurisdictional issues, not merits. Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - TelanganaJaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi
Courts have consistently emphasized territorial and substantive jurisdiction:
Territorial Jurisdiction: A Single Judge may dismiss Section 34 petitions if the supplier's location doesn't align with the court's territory. The learned Single Judge dismissed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act on the grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing that the MSME Council could only assume jurisdiction where the supplier is located or registered as an MSME. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - Delhi
Merits and Preliminary Objections: Jurisdictional challenges must be raised early. Jurisdictional objections can be raised as preliminary issues, and courts or tribunals are expected to decide these before proceeding with substantive disputes. Failure to do so can lead to orders being set aside. Northroof Ventures Private Limited VS XYNC Structural Solutions Pvt. Ltd. - Karnataka
Nature of Orders: Not all Council decisions qualify as appealable 'orders'. For instance, meeting minutes may not be treated as formal orders under the Act. Siotia Steels Limited, represented by its Director Sri Bhagwati Prasad Siotia VS NBCC (India) Limited, (formerly known as National Building Construction Corporation Limited), represented by its Deputy General Manager, HRM and duly authorised Officer - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 854 - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 854
M/s. Vaishno Enterprises v. Hamilton Medical AG: The Supreme Court ruled that the MSME Act would not apply if the supplier was not registered as an MSME at the time of the contract, thus affirming the lack of jurisdiction of the MSME Council. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi
In another ruling: Order passed by the MSE Facilitation Council is therefore without jurisdiction... against the order of Tribunal passed under Section 16 (2) of the Act of 1996, the only mechanism of challenge is under Section 34 of the Act of 1996. Aakash Agro Through Proprietor Sanjay Marotrao Punde VS Micro And Small Enterprise Facilitation Council (MSEFC) - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 329 - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 329
High Courts have clarified that writs against Section 16 orders are generally not maintainable, pushing parties to statutory appeals. Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - TelanganaJaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - DelhiV.K.S. Constructions vs State of Telangana - Telangana
These cases underscore that jurisdiction is a threshold issue—courts won't delve into merits without it.
Registration Timing: The registration of an MSME after a dispute has arisen does not automatically confer jurisdiction on the Council. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - DelhiResurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana
Works Contracts and Exclusions: Certain disputes, like works contracts, may fall outside the Council's scope. Solar Designs Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, A. A. K. Apath Sakaayem VS M. M. C. Doortech Services Private Limited - MadrasResurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - Telangana
Pre-Deposit Requirement: Appeals or applications under Section 19 require 75% deposit: made challenging any decree, award or any other order as also word ‘application’ used in Section 19 may equally include even any appeal challenging any decree, award or other order made, which requires pre-deposit of 75% of the amount awarded. Spunpipe & Construction Company (Baroda) Private Limited VS State Of Gujarat - Through Executive Engineer - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1158 - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1158
Review vs. Appeal: Erroneous orders can't be reviewed under Order 47 CPC; appeal is the remedy. Docket Care Systems Lko. Thru. Partner Shri Pankaj Kumar Agarwal VS Union of India, Thru. Secy. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, New Delhi - Allahabad
If jurisdiction is absent, seek dismissal rather than appeal.
Appealing an MSME Tribunal order requires a solid jurisdictional foundation under the MSME Act and Arbitration Act. Primarily, ensure the supplier was registered pre-contract; otherwise, the Council's order may not be challengeable via standard appeals. Courts prioritize jurisdictional resolution before merits, as seen in Vaishno Enterprises and allied cases.
Key Takeaways:- Jurisdiction is prerequisite; no registration at contract = no Council authority. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi- Use Section 19/34 for awards, Section 37 for specific orders.- Pre-deposit 75% mandatory for challenges. Spunpipe & Construction Company (Baroda) Private Limited VS State Of Gujarat - Through Executive Engineer - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1158 - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1158- Raise objections preliminarily to avoid void proceedings. Northroof Ventures Private Limited VS XYNC Structural Solutions Pvt. Ltd. - Karnataka
Businesses should document MSME status meticulously. For tailored advice, engage legal experts. Stay informed to protect your interests in MSME disputes.
References:- Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. VS FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs FEPL Engineering (P) Ltd. - DelhiJaiprakash Associates Ltd. VS Micro And Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (South East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi - DelhiSiotia Steels Limited, represented by its Director Sri Bhagwati Prasad Siotia VS NBCC (India) Limited, (formerly known as National Building Construction Corporation Limited), represented by its Deputy General Manager, HRM and duly authorised Officer - 2024 Supreme(Gau) 854 - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 854Spunpipe & Construction Company (Baroda) Private Limited VS State Of Gujarat - Through Executive Engineer - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1158 - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1158Aakash Agro Through Proprietor Sanjay Marotrao Punde VS Micro And Small Enterprise Facilitation Council (MSEFC) - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 329 - 2023 0 Supreme(Chh) 329Resurgent Power Projects Ltd. VS State of Telangana - TelanganaNorthroof Ventures Private Limited VS XYNC Structural Solutions Pvt. Ltd. - Karnataka
#MSMEAppeal, #MSMEJurisdiction, #BusinessLawIndia
ORDER : Prayer : Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 11.06.2021 passed in MSEFC/CR/230/2019 on the file of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Chennai Region. ... If that be so the Council would have no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute between the appellant and the Respondent no. 1, in exercise of powers under Section 18 of the #....
Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent NBCC (India) Limited that the argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent NBCC (India) Limited has to file an application under Section 19 of the MSME Act, 2006 for setting aside the order of the Council, has no merit ... because the impugned minutes of the meeting passed by the Council cannot be treated as an order passed under Section 1....
An erroneous order may be subjected to appeal before the higher forum but cannot be a subject matter of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.” ... the counter-party was also a registered MSME entity, the Council would lack jurisdiction in this regard. ... Assam SEB, (2020) 2 SCC 677 and observed that “the High Court has exceeded in its jurisdiction and has exercised the jurisdictio....
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mcdermott International INC (supra) has observed that jurisdictional question to be decided as preliminary ground as the objection to jurisdiction if allowed would be subject matter of appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, whereas the award is to be challenged ... Thereafter, proceedings under Section 18 (3) of MSME Act for arbitration was started by the Facilitation Council itself and time to ....
made challenging any decree, award or any other order as also word ‘application’ used in Section 19 may equally include even any appeal challenging any decree, award or other order made, which requires pre-deposit of 75% of the amount awarded as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal. ... According to the ‘MSME Act’, the Small Scale Industry obtained a Registration Certificate existing before the co....
The present appeal is accordingly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ... with Section 19 of MSME Act. ... Assuming but not admitting that the award is without Jurisdiction and nullity, even the said issue must be adjudicated in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum under Section 34 of the 1996 r/w Section 19 of MSME Act and not under Writ Jurisdiction. ... In vi....
Order passed by the MSE Facilitation Council is therefore without jurisdiction. ... of 1996”) read with Section 19 of the MSME Act. ... (Civil Appeal No. 14665 of 2015 decided on 6th January 2021) observed that against the order of Tribunal passed under Section 16 (2) of the Act of 1996, the only mechanism of challenge is under Section 34 of the Act of 1996 as the Act of 1996 is a complete code. ... to #H....
Long thereafter, on 07.01.2023, the petitioner files an application under Order 14 Rule 2(2) read with Section 151 of the CPC, to try the issue of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue. No order is passed on the said application. ... If that be so the Council would have no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute between the appellant and the Respondent no. 1, in exercise of powers under Section 18 of the MSME....
, Civil Appeal No.1892 of 2022 to argue that under similar circumstances, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the MSME Act would not be applicable. ... If that be so the Council would have no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute between the appellant and the Respondent no.1, in exercise of powers under Section 18 of the MSME Act. ... Therefore, in the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, more parti....
(3) No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the Supreme Court. ... After hearing both the Petitioner and Respondent No. 3, the Council vide impugned order dated 21.12.2024 held that they have no jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute. The said order was pas....
3.1 Elaborating the aforesaid grounds, it is vehemently submitted by Shri K.M. Nataraj, learned ASG that the original writ petitioner claims to be a non-profit organisation carrying out independent research, advisory and advocacy in the field of civil aviation. iii) MSME order of 2012 and MSME order of 2018 are not applicable in the facts of the present case It is submitted that as per the settled position, NGOs have no locus standi to maintain a writ petition challenging the....
3.2. On 9th January 2019, Appellant filed a Writ Petition being W.P. No. 769 of 2019 before the High Court of Bombay titled as "Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Maharashtra Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council, Konkan Region, Thane", challenging the conduct of arbitration proceedings by the MSME Council. The said proceedings were terminated on 14th December 2018, resulting in the impugned Award being passed in favour of the Respondent. However, on account of failure of the Council ....
Forum was taken by the applicant and sent the entire file to its Counsel for drafting of memo appeal and the same was prepared by the Counsel and sent a draft of memo of appeal to higher authority of the appellant and sent a request on to concerned department of the applicant for permitting preparation of a cheque for Rs. 25,000 in compliance of Proviso of Section 15 of the CPA and sent entire file to concerned department." (5) Thereafter the concerned Counsel has sent his opinion to the highe....
4. By the order dated 5.9.2006, the said writ petition was dismissed by this Court, inter alia, observing that "the petitioner may, if he is. so advised, file appeal against the impugned order".
The perusal of bare section shows that before 1981, appeal was provided before “any judicial authority appointed by State Government concerned”. The order of confiscation is passed under Section 6C thereof. Act permit aggrieved person to file appeal against the order of confiscation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
