Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Mundkar Proceedings and Third-Party Applications - Once a house is purchased or a declaration of mundkarship is made, third parties can still file applications for negative declaration or to establish their mundkarial rights. Such proceedings are initiated before the Mamlatdar, who is the competent authority for declaring mundkarship under the relevant Act. The Mamlatdar's decision can impact third-party interests and the status of the property ["Lawrance Pereira VS Kay Jay Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"] ["Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835"].
Legal Framework for Declaration of Mundkarship - Section 8A, introduced by the 1978 amendment, specifically deals with declaring a person as a mundkar after an enquiry by the Mamlatdar. The process involves filing an application, and if grieved by the decision, a person can appeal to the Collector within sixty days. The record of such declarations has a presumptive value, and proceedings can be initiated even after a house is purchased, indicating that such declarations and related proceedings are independent of ownership transfer ["Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835"] ["Joaquim D''''souza (since deceased) VS Piru Ganesh Tulaskar, (since deceased) - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1671"].
Impact of Pending Applications on Property Rights - Pending mundkarial applications or proceedings do not necessarily bar third parties from filing for negative declarations or asserting rights. Courts have observed that such proceedings are separate and can continue independently, but the outcome may influence the title or possession rights. For instance, a third-party application for negative declaration can be filed even after the purchase of the house, and the Mamlatdar's decision remains crucial ["Lawrance Pereira VS Kay Jay Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"] ["SHRI JOAQUIM D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS LRS. AND ANR.(DECEASED) vs SMT. PIRU GANESH TULASKAR (DEC) THR. LRS AND 8 ORS - Bombay"].
Third-Party Filing of Negative Declarations - It is permissible for third persons to file applications for negative declaration or to assert mundkarial rights after the house is purchased. The courts have clarified that such applications are statutory remedies available to third parties to establish their rights, and the decisions in such proceedings are significant for the property's legal status ["Joaquim D''''souza (since deceased) VS Piru Ganesh Tulaskar, (since deceased) - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1671"] ["SHRI JOAQUIM D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS LRS. AND ANR.(DECEASED) vs SMT. PIRU GANESH TULASKAR (DEC) THR. LRS AND 8 ORS - Bombay"].
Effect of Mamlatdar's Orders and Proceedings - Orders passed by the Mamlatdar, including restraining third-party interest or declaring a person as a mundkar, are binding and can be challenged or appealed. The proceedings are designed to determine mundkarship independently, and subsequent purchase or transfer does not automatically negate the pending or existing declarations ["Lawrance Pereira VS Kay Jay Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"] ["Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835"].
Analysis and Conclusion:In summary, once a house is purchased or a declaration of mundkarship is made, third persons retain the right to file applications for negative declaration or to establish their mundkarial rights before the Mamlatdar. These proceedings are statutory and can continue independently of ownership transfers. The Mamlatdar's orders significantly influence the legal status of the property, and such applications are valid and can be filed at any stage, including after the house has been bought. Therefore, third-party applications for negative declaration are permissible even after the house is purchased, and their outcome can affect the property rights and interests.References: ["Lawrance Pereira VS Kay Jay Constructions Co. Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"] ["Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835"]
In the unique land tenure system of Goa, mundkar rights protect long-term occupants known as mundkars from eviction by landowners or bhatkars. These rights, governed by the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 (Mundkar Act), allow mundkars to purchase their dwelling houses under specific conditions. But what happens when a third party wants to challenge this status after the purchase is complete?
A common query arises: In mundkar proceedings, once the mundkarial house is purchased, can a third person file an application for negative declaration? This post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from key judicial interpretations and statutory provisions. Note that this is general information based on precedents and should not be taken as specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Mundkars are tenants or occupants of dwelling houses on bhatkar lands with historical protection against arbitrary eviction. The Mundkar Act provides safeguards like protection from dispossession (Section 5) and the right to purchase the house and appurtenant land (Section 15). Section 8A, introduced by amendment, empowers the Mamlatdar to issue declarations of mundkarship—either positive (confirming status) or negative (denying it). Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835
Section 31 bars civil courts from entertaining matters that the Mamlatdar must decide under the Act, ensuring specialized jurisdiction for mundkar disputes. However, this bar applies only while mundkar rights subsist. Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council and another VS Vaman Shirgaokar (deceased) - 1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 334
No, once the mundkarial house is purchased under Section 15, a third person typically cannot file an application for negative declaration in mundkar proceedings. The purchase vests full ownership in the mundkar, terminating the mundkar status and the applicability of mundkar-specific proceedings. Disputes then shift to civil courts for resolution, such as title, possession, or encroachment claims. Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council and another VS Vaman Shirgaokar (deceased) - 1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 334Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835
Applications under Section 8A are maintainable prior to or during purchase proceedings to challenge mundkar status. But post-purchase, the protections under the Act cease, rendering further mundkar declarations inapplicable. Joaquim D''''souza (since deceased) VS Piru Ganesh Tulaskar, (since deceased) - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1671
Section 8A allows the Mamlatdar to grant declarations while mundkar rights are active. Courts have upheld negative declarations even against registered mundkars if filed timely. For instance, in a case where respondents' father was registered as a mundkar in 1988 and purchase proceedings began around 2000, the Mamlatdar granted a negative declaration on 19/09/2016 after the respondents were ex-parte. The High Court noted: the application for negative declaration moved by the petitioners under Section 8-A of the Act came to be decided by the Mamlatdar... which held that the respondents were not declared to be mundkar of the suit property and the suit house. Joaquim D''''souza (since deceased) VS Piru Ganesh Tulaskar, (since deceased) - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1671
This illustrates maintainability pre- or during purchase but confirms it does not extend post-purchase, as the status fundamentally changes.
Under Sections 15 and 16, the mundkar exercises an option to purchase, transitioning from protected occupant to owner. Post-purchase: Such a right can be claimed only after exercise of the option and purchase of such area around or appurtenant to his house by a mundkar in terms of sections 15 and 16 of the Mundkar Act. Unless the rights of a mundkar in terms of section 15 are exercised and confirmed... a mundkar cannot claim violation of any of his alleged rights. Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council and another VS Vaman Shirgaokar (deceased) - 1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 334
Once ownership vests, the house is no longer 'mundkarial,' barring Section 8A applications. The Mamlatdar's jurisdiction ends, as there's no subsisting mundkar right to declare negatively. Cyril Sequeira VS Victor Joao Baptista - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 835
Section 31 bars civil courts only for Act-specific matters. After purchase, third-party claims (e.g., encroachments) fall outside: the questions as to what is the extent of area of the dwelling house of the plaintiff as a mundkar... are essentially the questions which are, under the Mundkar Act, required to be settled... by the Mamlatdar... The jurisdiction of the Civil Court... is clearly barred by section 31(2). But without mundkar status, no such bar applies inversely for mundkar proceedings. Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council and another VS Vaman Shirgaokar (deceased) - 1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 334
Judicial precedents reinforce the timeline. In one matter, third-party intervention in mundkar proceedings was rejected, emphasizing: intervention in mundkar proceedings is not permitted based on potential impact on related civil suits; rights must be independently established. Mr. Assis Piedade Fernandes vs Smt. Luizinha Pereira
Another ruling clarified that purchase applications require prior Section 8A declarations: no application for purchase of mundkarial dwelling house would be maintainable until and unless the party making such an application has applied for and obtained a declaration under Section 8A. Carlos Francisco Monteiro VS Josefina Baptista - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 596 This underscores pre-purchase challenges but implies post-purchase irrelevance.
Even prior rejections under Section 29 (registration) do not bar Section 8A filings by res judicata: merely because during the course of the application for registration of Mundkar, a person has been treated to be not a mundkar, by itself would not disentitle such a person to file an application under Section 8A. Vassant Krishna Palyekar VS Agnela Figueira - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 1969 However, this applies pre-purchase.
In cases of final mundkar decisions, subsequent claims are barred once finality is attained, preventing collateral attacks post-decree. Pramila Prabhakar Arlekar VS Antonieta Adelina Temudo - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 2692
Registration entries under Section 29/30 have only presumptive value, allowing challenges via Section 8A pre-purchase. Cazi Mohammad Patchmiam VS Sitabai Balaram Nipanikar - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 355
If you're a third party challenging occupation post-purchase, file a civil suit for title, possession, or injunction—mundkar proceedings won't apply. Pre-purchase disputes? Promptly approach the Mamlatdar under Section 8A. Act with clean hands; suppressing prior applications may bar relief. Chief Officer, Margao Municipal Council and another VS Vaman Shirgaokar (deceased) - 1998 0 Supreme(Bom) 334
Bhatkars or owners should ensure demarcation and purchase finality to avoid lingering claims. Mundkars: Secure your declaration early to enable purchase. Carlos Francisco Monteiro VS Josefina Baptista - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 596
This framework protects genuine mundkar rights while clarifying boundaries for third parties in Goa's property landscape.
#MundkarAct #GoaPropertyLaw #NegativeDeclaration
In the said Application for declaration of mundkarship filed before the Mamlatdar, it is claimed that the name of Roque alias Roquim Pereira i.e father of the Petitioners is recorded in other rights column of survey holding as Mundkar of House No. E-4/133 with one well. ... After filing such mundkarial proceedings, the Petitioners moved an Application before the Executing Court by way of an objection under Order XXI, Rule 97 of CPC claiming that since the mu....
Sec. 8 A was introduced by the amendment Act of 18 of 1978 which specifically deals with declaration of right of mundkarship. On filing of such application, the Mamlatdar after holding necessary enquiry is entitled to declaration of a person as mundkar of the dwelling house. ... In case any person is grieved by the registration of a mundkar or by refusal to register a person claiming to be a mundkar is entitled to ....
third party, as in the present case. ... and thus the decision in the mundkarial proceedings has a bearing on the purchase of mundkarial house in favour of the the mundkarial area has been demarcated.
be mundkar of the suit property and the suit house. ... The revision petition was dismissed as the application for negative declaration filed by the petitioner was pending. The negative declaration was granted to the petitioner vide the order dated 19/09/2016 and in view of the negative declaration the impugned order was required to be set aside. ... Pending such proceedings an application for #HL....
On 18.03.2013, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 filed an application for declaration and registration as mundkar against the respondent no. 3 before the Mamlatdar of Tiswadi. ... the mundkarial house of the petitioners. ... By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 13.05.2015, by which the learned Joint Mamlatdar of Tiswadi Taluka, Panaji, has rejected the application filed by the petitioners, seeking to intervene in the proceedings for de....
Jose was a Mundkar and the suit house was a Mundkarial house. ... the mamlatdar on the ground that she was not a Mundkar and the said house was not a Mundkarial house. ... The learned Senior Counsel submitted that though in the first instance the suit appears to be a suit for declaration of ownership and eviction of the respondent No. 2, in fact, it is a suit seeking ouster of a Mundkar from the Mundkaria....
Luizinha Pereira and others)1, 1998(3)Bom.C.R. 720 and submitted that the plaintiff cannot complain of any violation of his mundkarial rights, since he has not purchased the dwelling house in question. ... As a matter of fact two years prior to the filing of the suit, the plaintiff had filed an application before the Mamlatdar for declaration of his right as a mundkar. However, the plaintiff suppressed this material fact when he filed the suit in 1982. ... In that event, the maximum ex....
for negative declaration. ... Pending such proceedings an application for negative declaration was moved by the petitioner under Section 8(A) of application for negative declaration filed by the petitioner was p style="position:absolute ... declaration was accepted. ... of the suit property and the suit house.
The learned Mamlatdar decided the issue in the negative on 31/12/1990 holding that the fifth respondent was not the mundkar of the suit house. ... In the case of Jency (supra) the suit was filed for a declaration that the order passed by the Mamlatdar and the sanad issued by the Deputy Collector after purchase of the mundkarial house was void. ... It is submitted that the decision in the case of Jency (supra) would be distinguishable on facts as in that case, the appellants/original pl....
filed for declaration of Mundkar before the Mamlatdar, the execution be stayed. ... In the said Application for declaration of mundkarship filed before the Mamlatdar, it is claimed that the name of Roque alias Roquim Pereira i.e father of the Petitioners is recorded in other rights column of survey holding as Mundkar of House No. E-4/133 with one well. ... After filing such mundkarial proceedings, the Petitioners moved an Application#HL_EN....
1. Shri Roque Fernandes ( since deceased through LRs) & Ors. 4. Mr. Thali, relying on the following decisions has contended that no application for purchase of mundkarial dwelling house would be maintainable until and unless the party making such an application has applied for and obtained a declaration under Section 8A of the said Act to the effect that he is indeed mundkar in respect of the dwelling house. Vs M/s. Dempo Properties and Investments Pvt. Ltd., & Ors., (2010) Supp AllMR 349; 2. Keshav Bablo Gawde & Ors Vs Ramakant Khandeparkar & Ors., (1998) 3 AllMR 391; 3. S....
Hence, merely because during the course of the application for registration of Mundkar, a person has been treated to be not a mundkar, by itself would not disentitle such a person to file an application under Section 8A of the Mundkar Act for declaration and such application cannot be dismissed as being barred by principle of res judicata. The Division Bench has also considered that under the provisions of Section 30 of the Mundkar Act, the entries are presumed to be true until the contrary is proved. 8. On perusal of the said judgment, the Division Bench of this ....
His case is that he is a mundkar who was residing in the said house and, therefore, by virtue of the provisions of the Mundkar Act, he is entitled to reconstruct his mundkarial house in the plinth area. There is no doubt that, under the prevailing law a mundkar is entitled to repair or reconstruct his mundkarial house provided he does not exceed the original plinth area. Thus, the question that arises is whether the petitioner was entitled to reconstruct the same house. But, the relevant point to consider is that only a mundkar is entitled to reconstruct or repair his mundk....
Thereafter, the plaintiffs started digging the foundation. The defendant is a mundkar, having his mundkarial house in the said property. The construction of the house undertaken by the plaintiffs was well outside the mundkarial rights of the defendant. However, the defendant filed a false, frivolous and vexatious proceedings bearing Case no.
5. It is well settled by the pronouncement of this Court that the proceedings for registering a mundkar are in the nature of summary proceedings and that the entry made in the register of mundkar of a particular village has only presumptive value and that under Section 8-A of the said Act, a person can seek a declaration of being a mundkar whereas the bhatkar can seek a negative declaration that the person in occupation is not a mundkar. A reference could be made to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court reported in 1995(1) GLT page 154 in the matter of Smt. Gulab....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
