Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Novation and Disputed Amounts - The sources indicate that there are two versions of a Novation Agreement (the First Novation and the Second Novation). The First is an eight-page document without an appendix, executed on behalf of Cekap by Yong Chee Hon. The Second Novation includes an appendix and is disputed by the Applicant, who denies owing the claimed amount. The second Novation's validity is challenged, and its attached appendix distinguishes it from the first. Both documents are central to the dispute over the owed amount and the validity of the novation process ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court"] ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur"].
Dispute over Debt and Settlement - The Applicant disputes the Respondent's claim of owing a large sum (e.g., RM38,387,745.70), asserting that the debt amount is not acknowledged or settled. The Applicant argues that the existence of two versions of the Novation Agreement and the disputed nature of the second version cast doubt on the enforceability of the claimed debt. This dispute is compounded by the Applicant's denial of owing the amount, suggesting that the settlement or novation may not have been effectively executed or recognized ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court"] ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur"].
Legal Principles of Novation - Several sources elaborate on Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which defines novation as the complete substitution of a new contract in place of an old one, requiring the consent of all parties. The law emphasizes that a novation results in the extinguishment of the original debt or obligation, and the new agreement must involve clear, mutual consent. Many references confirm that mere rescheduling or restructuring of a loan does not necessarily constitute novation unless there is a clear substitution of contracts with all requisite elements, including agreement and intent ["1. Chelliah Ramachandran and 2. Manohari Ramachandran Both of 49 Collingwood Place Colombo 06. 2nd to 3rd Defendant-Ap - Supreme Court"] ["Southern Group Team Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. vs Ceylon Comany Group (Pvt) Ltd. - Supreme Court"] ["Ms. Mausumi Bhattacharjee vs Jumbo Chemicals And Allied Industries Private Limited - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal"] ["Sasidaran VS India Cements Capital Limited, Rep. by its Assistant General Legal, Pradeep - Madras"] ["GENTARI SDN BHD vs PEMUNGUT DUTI SETEM MALAYSIA - High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur"] ["GENTARI SDN BHD vs PEMUNGUT DUTI SETEM MALAYSIA - High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur"] ["KARTHIKESU et al. v. PONNACHY"] ["RODRIGO ET AL. v. EBRAHIM"] ["M.K.ABRAHAM vs PETER CHERIAN VELIAYTHUMALIL - Kerala"] ["SHAJI MATHEW vs JOBY JOHN - Kerala"] ["SHAJI MATHEW vs JOBY JOHN - Kerala"] ["P. Chandramma VS Sambaiah - Andhra Pradesh"] ["K. G. Denim Finance Limited, Coimbatore Represented by D. Ramesh VS Salem Textiles Limited, Rep by R. Prabakaran, Salem - Madras"] ["K.G.DENIM FINANCE LIMITED vs SALEM TEXTILES LIMITED - Madras"] ["M/S B S ENVIRO N INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED vs VIJ CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. - Delhi"] ["Andhra Bank, Sowcarpet, Chennai VS Bhagya Nagar Solvent Extractions Pvt. Ltd. , T. Nagar, Chennai - Madras"]].
Novation and Settlement of Loans - Several cases and documents highlight that a novation involves the complete substitution of a new contract and discharges the previous debt. For example, a letter or agreement that explicitly states the replacement of the old obligation with a new one can amount to novation. Conversely, informal or ambiguous arrangements, such as mere rescheduling or partial payments, do not meet the criteria for novation. The legal effect is that the original debt is extinguished when a valid novation is established ["1. Chelliah Ramachandran and 2. Manohari Ramachandran Both of 49 Collingwood Place Colombo 06. 2nd to 3rd Defendant-Ap - Supreme Court"] ["Southern Group Team Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. vs Ceylon Comany Group (Pvt) Ltd. - Supreme Court"] ["SHAJI MATHEW vs JOBY JOHN - Kerala"].
Implications for the Present Dispute - The presence of two versions of the Novation Agreement, with the second being disputed and containing an appendix, suggests that the novation's validity is questionable. The Applicant's denial of owing the amount and the disputed status of the second agreement imply that the novation may not have effectively replaced the original debt, and therefore, the claim for settled or lesser amounts remains contested. The legal requirement for clear consent and complete substitution, as articulated in Section 62, is critical in determining whether the debt was indeed settled or replaced ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court"] ["CEKAP AIR SDN BHD vs SERBA DINAMIK SDN BHD - High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur"].
Summary:The sources collectively demonstrate that the concept of novation under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act requires a clear, mutual agreement to substitute a new contract, which extinguishes the old debt. In this case, there are two versions of a Novation Agreement, with the second being disputed and containing an appendix, raising questions about its validity. The Applicant disputes owing the claimed amount, and the evidence suggests that the novation may not have been effectively executed, leaving the question of settlement and lesser amounts unresolved.
In the world of contracts, parties often seek to modify terms to resolve disputes or adapt to changing circumstances. A common scenario arises when a debtor settles a debt or obligation for a lesser amount than originally agreed. But does this constitute novation under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872? The question novation as 62 contacted settled for lesse amount captures this dilemma faced by many businesses and individuals.
This blog post dives deep into the legal principles, distinguishing novation from mere variations or settlements. We'll explore definitions, case laws, and practical insights to help you navigate these complexities. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Novation is a specific mechanism under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, which states that if the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for the old one, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. KSL & Industries Ltd VS National Textiles Corporation Ltd. - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1804
Key elements of novation include:- Complete substitution: The old contract is fully extinguished, and a new one takes its place.- Mutual consent: All parties must agree to the replacement.- Discharge of old obligations: Previous rights and liabilities under the original contract cease to exist. Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573
As explained in a Division Bench decision, Novation operates as a release of the original debtor and its effect is to discharge a party from its obligation under the old contract. KSL & Industries Ltd VS National Textiles Corporation Ltd. - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1804
However, not every change qualifies. The Supreme Court in Chrisomar Corpn. v. MJR Steels (P) Ltd. (2018) clarified: In order that a contract that is altered in material particulars fall under Section 62 it must be clear that the alteration must go to the very root of the original contract and change its essential character, so that the modified contract must be read as doing away with the original contract. Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573
A critical distinction lies between variations (mere modifications) and novation. Changes that do not alter the fundamental nature or essential terms of the contract are typically seen as amendments, not novation. Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573
For example:- Adjusting payment schedules or minor terms? Likely a variation.- Completely replacing the contract's core obligations? Potentially novation.
In Juggilal Kamlapat v. N.V. Internationale Credit-En-Handels Vereeniging (AIR 1955 Cal 65), the court held that if modifications do not go to the very root of the original contract and do not change its essential character, they do not amount to novation. Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573
Mere variations keep the original contract alive, subject to the tweaks, whereas novation wipes it out entirely.
Settling a contract or debt for a lesser amount is common in negotiations, but does it automatically trigger novation? Generally, no. Such arrangements are often treated as accord and satisfaction or simple variations, unless they explicitly replace the entire original contract. Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam, S/o. Thomas VS Molly George @ Molamma, D/O. George @ Varghese - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 377
Key reasons:- No complete substitution: Paying less does not inherently extinguish all original obligations; it may just satisfy them partially.- Lack of intent to replace: Without clear evidence of mutual intent to discharge the old contract fully, it's not novation. Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam, S/o. Thomas VS Molly George @ Molamma, D/O. George @ Varghese - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 377
Courts have repeatedly ruled that settlements or Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) do not amount to novation without full compliance and clear replacement intent. For instance, Therefore, the MOD does not amount to novation of contract as envisaged under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act. Even otherwise, there has been non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOD by the respondents and a party in breach can hardly seek to enforce a contract. Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(MP) 812NARINDER KUMAR MALIK VS SURINDER KUMAR MALIK - 2009 Supreme(UK) 407Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(SC) 1392
In cases involving time-bound MOUs, failure to perform within stipulated periods (even if extendable) reinforces that time remains the essence, and non-compliance prevents claims of novation. NARINDER KUMAR MALIK VS SURINDER KUMAR MALIK - 2009 Supreme(UK) 407
Judicial precedents provide clarity:- Chrisomar Corpn. v. MJR Steels (P) Ltd. (2018): Unless the new agreement completely replaces the old, it's a variation, not novation. Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573- M/s R.S. Amar Nath Mehra & Co. vs. Union of India (1993): Novation requires discharge of the old contract via substitution or rescission. KSL & Industries Ltd VS National Textiles Corporation Ltd. - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1804
In property disputes, agreements substituting land parcels were scrutinized for delivery of possession and intent, but incomplete performance undermined novation claims. Som Parkash VS Karam Dass Through His L. Rs. - 2008 Supreme(P&H) 642
Another ruling emphasized: Mere show of readiness and willingness thereafter would not discharge the obligation resting on one of the parties unless it is shown to be real and genuine. NARINDER KUMAR MALIK VS SURINDER KUMAR MALIK - 2009 Supreme(UK) 407
These cases highlight that settlements for lesser amounts or partial changes rarely meet Section 62's strict threshold without explicit terms evidencing full replacement.
There are scenarios where a lesser amount settlement could be novation:- Explicit agreement: Parties document intent to extinguish the old contract and substitute a new one, e.g., This payment fully discharges all prior obligations.- Root-level change: The settlement alters the contract's essence, like shifting from a sale to a lease entirely.
Even then, courts examine conduct. Non-compliance by one party, such as missing deadlines in an MOU, defeats novation claims: A party in breach can hardly seek to enforce a contract. Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(MP) 812
To avoid disputes:- Document intent clearly: Use phrases like This new agreement substitutes and extinguishes the original contract.- Ensure mutual consent: Get written acknowledgments from all parties.- Monitor compliance: Time-bound settlements must be met, as extensions don't negate essence of time. Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(SC) 1392- Seek legal review: Before finalizing, confirm if it's novation or variation to protect enforceability.
When interpreting past settlements, look for evidence of full discharge—mere lesser payment typically isn't enough. Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam, S/o. Thomas VS Molly George @ Molamma, D/O. George @ Varghese - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 377
Understanding these nuances can prevent costly litigation. For tailored advice, consult a legal professional familiar with Indian contract law.
References:- Salman Fayis V. S/o Ashraf vs State of Kerala - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2573, Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam, S/o. Thomas VS Molly George @ Molamma, D/O. George @ Varghese - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 377, KSL & Industries Ltd VS National Textiles Corporation Ltd. - 2012 Supreme(Del) 1804, Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(MP) 812, NARINDER KUMAR MALIK VS SURINDER KUMAR MALIK - 2009 Supreme(UK) 407, Narinder Kumar Malik VS Surinder Kumar Malik - 2009 Supreme(SC) 1392, Som Parkash VS Karam Dass Through His L. Rs. - 2008 Supreme(P&H) 642
This post is for informational purposes only and based on general legal principles and cited documents.
#Novation #Section62 #ContractLaw
The Applicant replied by a letter dated 3 April 2023 denying and disputing the amount allegedly owing. (b) The Respondent thereafter issued a second letter of demand dated 16 May 2023, demanding a smaller amount of RM38,387,745.70. ... A notable difference between the First Novation and the Second Novation is that the Second Novation has an appendix attached. [21] The Second Novation is disputed. In his affidavit in encl 17 at para 74, Yong Chee Hon avers: "74. ... [4] The Applicant, ....
The Applicant replied by a letter dated 03.042023 denying and disputing the amount allegedly owing. (b) The Respondent thereafter issued a second letter of demand dated 16 May 2023, demanding a smaller amount of RM38,387,745.70. ... A notable difference between the First Novation and the Second Novation is that the Second Novation has an appendix attached. [21] The Second Novation is disputed. In his affidavit in encl 17 at para 74, Yong Chee Hon avers: "74. ... [4] The Applicant, how....
In contrast, a novation is the replacement of a contract by a new contract between different parties. Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows: 62. Effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contract. ... I hold that the 2nd and 3rd defendants failed to establish that the previous loan was settled and that a new loan with fresh terms (excluding the Mortgage Bond P4) was granted on 30.12.2012, thereby establishing a novation of the old loan agreement. ... Thi....
According to the Respondent, this amount was lent and advanced by the Respondent to the Appellant by providing the Appellant a letter of credit for the said amount to import six oil burners. ... On principle, we all agree that this should be settled as soon as possible and your first suggestion (Bi annual payments) is an ideal method to be adopted. ... 2) The remaining 50% (Rs. 65 Million) of the funds advanced will be settled with in the 18 months commencing from end April 2000. ... Furthermore we had to invest a consi....
Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 will come into play in the present appeal.
the said amount of sale consideration. ... ... This provision contains the Principle of “Novation” of contract. ... One of the essential requirements or “Novation”, as contemplated by Section 62, is that there should be complete substitution of a new contract in place of the old. ... The law is well settled that while exercising the powers under Section 34 of the Act, this Court cannot sit as an Appellant Court for re-appreciating the evidence. ... Ramadas Mahadeo Prashad and others, In this judgment....
(c) The consideration amount under the Novation Agreement is the outstanding loan amount of RM151,425,000.00 by GRSB to Petronas under the Shareholders' Loan Agreements. ... It has been held that when there is a change in the parties in a novation, the new agreement does not amount to an assignment of the rights of the parties. Novation creates a new contract. It is an instrument to change parties to the contract, not an assignment or transfer of debt. ... The value is the outstanding....
(c) The consideration amount under the Novation Agreement is the outstanding loan amount of RM151,425,00.00 by GRSB to Petronas under the Shareholders' Loan Agreements. ... It has been held that when there is a change in the parties in a novation, the new agreement does not amount to an assignment of the rights of the parties. Novation creates a new contract. It is an instrument to change parties to the contract, not an assignment or transfer of debt. ... The value is the outstanding ....
Giddings1), or to an agreement made on the erroneous supposition that the tenant for life of a settled estate was alive (Cochram v. Willis2). ... -The learned District Judge has held that the execution of the second mortgage amounted to a novation. The effect of a novation is to extinguish the former debt. Novation has the same effect as actual payment. Van der Linden 268; Pothier, vol. I., p. 390; Kader Saibu v. Teverayan. ... Novation-New debtor a minor-Creditor may sue the original debtor. ... ....
It has not been suggested in this case that the plaintiff supplied the labour for loading and transporting merchandise on a collateral undertaking by the appellants to pay the previous amount due only if the first defendant failed to do so. ... If so, it is a case of novation and not of guarantee, and it has never been suggested that the Statute, Ordinance No. 7 of 1840, enacted that a novation to be valid must be in writing. It can be by parol merely and still be perfectly valid." ... If A says to X, give M a receipt in full for....
Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act defines novation as under: “62. A Division Bench of this Court has explained the concept of novation in M/s R.S. Amar Nath Mehra & Co. vs. Union of India & Ors., 1993 III AD (Del) 735, in the following manner: “Novation operates as a release of the original debtor and its effect is to discharge a party from its obligation under the old contract. If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. Effect of novation, rescission and alteration of c....
Therefore, the MOD does not amount to novation of contract as envisaged under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act. Even otherwise, there has been non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOD by the respondents and a party in breach can hardly seek to enforce a contract. The contention of Mr. Ranjit Kumar is, therefore, legally untenable."
Even otherwise, there has been non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOU by the respondents and a party in breach can hardly seek to enforce a contract. Therefore, the MOU does not amount to novation of contract as envisaged under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act. The contention of Mr. Ranjit Kumar is, therefore, legally untenable.”
Therefore, the MOU does not amount to novation of contract as envisaged under Section 62 of the Indian Contract Act. Even otherwise, there has been noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the MOU by the respondents and a party in breach can hardly seek to enforce a contract. The contention of Mr. Ranjit Kumar is, therefore, legally untenable."
In the said agreement, it was mentioned that the previous agreement was executed between the defendant and the plaintiffs except Charan Dass, in respect of land situated at Banga, Bala and Kajla and that instead of this land, the first party (defendant) would get registered a gift deed in favour of second party (plaintiffs and Charan Dass) in respect of land situated at village Kajla, the detail of which is given in agreement dated 2.8.62 and the land measuring 55 Kanals 14 Marlas situated at Village Bala, the detail of which is given in said agreement dated 2.8.62 in accordance with the con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
