Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Order 38 Rule 5 CPC - Security Deposit for Money Recovery The primary legal provision for securing a money claim before judgment in a simple money recovery suit is Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. This rule empowers the court to order the defendant to deposit the claimed amount or furnish security, especially when there is a risk of the defendant disposing of or alienating property to obstruct enforcement of a future decree.References:2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 31894, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10588, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10587, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24795
Applicability to Simple Money Suits The rule explicitly applies to suits for recovery of money, not to other types of suits such as those based on unregistered documents or mortgage deeds. Courts have clarified that Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC are not applicable to simple money recovery suits; instead, Order 38 Rule 5 CPC is the appropriate remedy to seek attachment or security measures.References:2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 31894, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10588, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10587
Procedure and Conditions for Deposit or Security To invoke Order 38 Rule 5, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant intends to dispose of or alienate property to obstruct the recovery process. The court's power under this rule is extraordinary and should be exercised sparingly, only when the conditions are satisfied, such as imminent alienation or concealment of assets.References:2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577, 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1245, 2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 50652
Notice and Due Process Relief under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC cannot be granted without proper notice to the defendant. The courts emphasize the importance of giving the defendant an opportunity to be heard before ordering deposit or attachment.References:2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3588
Deposit of Money and Discharge of Attachment If the defendant deposits the claimed amount or provides security as ordered, the attachment or security measures can be lifted. Recent cases have confirmed that deposit made in accordance with court orders, especially after judicial permission, discharges the defendant from further liability or attachment.References:2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 31894, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10588, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10587, 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 24795
Legal Purpose and Limitations The purpose of Order 38 Rule 5 is not to convert unsecured debts into secured ones or to pressure defendants into settlement. Its use is strictly confined to preventing asset alienation to secure the recovery of money. Any misuse or attempt to leverage it for coercion should be discouraged.References:2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1245
Summary and Conclusion In simple money recovery suits, Order 38 Rule 5 CPC is the appropriate legal mechanism to seek security or attachment before judgment, especially when there is a risk of defendant alienation. It is not applicable to suits based on unregistered documents or mortgage deeds, which require other remedies. Proper notice, demonstration of risk, and judicial discretion are essential for the exercise of this power. Courts have consistently held that such relief is extraordinary and should be used sparingly to protect the interests of the plaintiff without misusing the provision to coerce or harass the defendant.References: Multiple sources confirm the legal stance, emphasizing the proper application and limitations of Order 38 Rule 5 CPC in money recovery proceedings.
In the realm of civil litigation, pursuing recovery of money owed can be challenging, especially when defendants risk disposing of assets to evade payment. A common question arises: Which Provisions of the CPC Provides for Filing a Suit for Money Recovery in CPC? While the (CPC) outlines general suit filing under , the specific mechanism for securing claims in money recovery suits—through or security deposits—primarily falls under CPC. This provision empowers courts to direct defendants to furnish security, safeguarding plaintiffs from potential asset alienation.
This blog post delves into the intricacies of CPC, its application in simple money recovery suits, procedural requirements, and judicial interpretations. Whether you're a creditor, business owner, or legal practitioner, understanding this rule can help protect your financial interests. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Order 38 of the CPC deals with the arrest and , designed to prevent defendants from obstructing or delaying execution of decrees. Specifically, CPC mandates that before ordering attachment of property, the court must call upon the defendant to furnish security. This is a in money recovery suits. As stated, before passing an order of , the court must call upon the defendant to furnish security 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877.
Failure to furnish such security after notice allows the court to proceed with attachment, but only if satisfied that the defendant is about to dispose of or remove property to obstruct the decree 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877. The security is not limited to cash deposits; it may include personal security or property as prescribed by the court 1992 0 Supreme(AP) 256.
To apply :- The plaintiff must demonstrate the defendant's intent to alienate assets 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577.- Courts exercise this power sparingly, as it is extraordinary2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1245.- Proper notice to the defendant is essential; orders without opportunity to be heard are invalid 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3588.
In simple money suits, this rule trumps others like , which are inapplicable. For instance, Admittedly, no application is filed under CPC and suit is filed for recovery of #HL_STAR.... highlighting its primacy over alternatives 2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 35460.
Exact quote: The court must satisfy itself that there is proper material indicating an attempt by the defendant to alienate assets with the intent to obstruct or delay the decree 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877. Without calling for security, attachment is 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877.
Other sources affirm: In ejectment suits involving money elements, courts scrutinize alongside, but for pure recovery, Rule 5 governs 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 3231.
Courts emphasize due process. The security contemplated under CPC is not limited to cash deposits; it includes any security as directed by the court, which may be personal security or security in the form of property 1992 0 Supreme(AP) 256.
In execution stays for money decrees, related provisions like require deposits: Hence, in my view the deposit is as per of the Code of Civil Procedure... as a condition for staying execution of the money decree 2011 0 Supreme(P&H) 1909. Similarly, default on security can lead to civil imprisonment under
2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 182.
Limitations: Not for unregistered documents or mortgages—use specific remedies 2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 35460. Purpose is preventive, not coercive: The purpose of is not to convert unsecured debts into secured ones 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1245. Mere allegations suffice not; material evidence needed 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877.
Recommendations:- Plaintiffs: Provide evidence of risk; ensure notice issued 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877.- Defendants: Comply promptly to avoid attachment.- Courts: Scrutinize intent before orders.
CPC is the cornerstone for securing money recovery suits, ensuring defendants furnish security before attachment to prevent decree evasion. It applies specifically to simple money claims, requiring judicial caution, notice, and evidence of mala fide intent 1996 0 Supreme(AP) 877 1992 0 Supreme(AP) 256 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 577.
Key Takeaways:- Mandatory call for security before attachment.- Applies to money suits, not mortgages/unregistered docs.- Extraordinary remedy—use sparingly.- Deposit discharges liability.
By leveraging this provision judiciously, plaintiffs can fortify claims while respecting defendants' rights. For tailored advice, engage a legal expert familiar with local court practices.
Word count: 1028. References drawn from provided legal documents for accuracy.
#Order38Rule5 #CPC #MoneyRecoverySuit
38 Rule 5 CPC, not Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, as the latter is not applicable to simple money suits. ... Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 41(b) and 37 - The court ruled that in a suit for recovery of money, the appropriate remedy is under Order ... Admittedly, no application is filed under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC and suit is filed for recovery....
Along with the said suit, the appellant also filed an Application under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC for the deposit of the claim amount payable by respondent No. 4 to appellant under the Award in the present civil suit pending adjudication between the parties. ... is about to remove or dispose of the whole or part of his property, with the intention of obstructing or delay....
CPC - Ejectment Suit - Order 38 Rule 1, Section 16 - [Order 38 Rule 1, Section 16] - The court considered the application filed ... under Order 38 Rule 1 CPC and the nature of the suit under Section 16 CPC. ... Issues: The main issue was whether the trial court was right in allowing the application filed under Order 38 Rule 1 CPC. ... It is necessary ....
38 Rule 5 CPC. ... 38 Rule 5 CPC instead of Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. ... that the unregistered document cannot be relied upon for recovery of money, and that the plaintiff has an alternate remedy under Order ... Admittedly, no application is filed under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC and suit is filed for recovery of #HL_STAR....
4) Along with the Suit, the plaintiff has filed a petition seeking attachment of the property of the defendant in the Suit before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC. ... No.459 of 2021, in I.A.No.1083 of 2019 in O.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, while allowing the petition filed seeking to raise the attachment that wa....
4) Along with the Suit, the plaintiff has filed a petition seeking attachment of the property of the defendant in the Suit before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC. ... No.459 of 2021, in I.A.No.1083 of 2019 in O.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, while allowing the petition filed seeking to raise the attachment that wa....
4) Along with the Suit, the plaintiff has filed a petition seeking attachment of the property of the defendant in the Suit before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC. ... No.459 of 2021, in I.A.No.1083 of 2019 in O.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, while allowing the petition filed seeking to raise the attachment that wa....
4) Along with the Suit, the plaintiff has filed a petition seeking attachment of the property of the defendant in the Suit before judgment under Order 38, Rule 5 CPC. ... No.459 of 2021, in I.A.No.1083 of 2019 in O.S.No.68 of 2019 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, while allowing the petition filed seeking to raise the attachment that wa....
The purpose of Order 38 Rule 5 is not to convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt. Any attempt by a plaintiff to utilise the provisions of Order 38 Rule 5 as a leverage for coercing the defendant to settle the suit claim should be discouraged. ... The purpose of Order 38 Rule ....
Order 38 Rule 5 CPC reads as under:- 5. ... It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have filed a suit for recovery of Rs.35,00,000/-. Accordingly, they filed an application under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC for attachment of immovable properties of....
H.P.Sandesh, J. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned Senior counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. It is settled position of law that in a suit for recovery of money, Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC cannot be invoked and the wisdom of the legislature also has to be taken note of and in order to protect the interest of the lender, the provision under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC to recover the money is made or otherwise, it will become paperless decree and the appellant/plaintiff i....
From the conjoint reading of the aforesaid Rules, it would transpire that it is obligatory upon the appellant to furnish a security as required under sub-rule (3)© of Rule 5 of the CPC for obtaining a stay of execution of money decree with the further rider contained in sub-rule (5) that on the failure of such deposit or furnishing security specified in sub-rule (3) of Rule 1 of the CPC, the Court shall not pass an order staying the execution of decree. Sub-rule (5) takes not....
Hence, in my view the deposit is as per Order 41 Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short `the Code') as a condition for staying execution of the money decree. The amount was paid only as security as per order of the Court pending appeal, as it was a money decree and stay was sought by present petitioners-judgment debtors of the money decree.
In the case of default of deposit of said security, the defendant shall undergo civil imprisonment and thus, the court decided both the applications under Order 38, Rule 1 and Order 38, Rule 5 CPC. 2. The learned court below has directed by the impugned order that since the defendant has already put in appearance in the court, the court is not issuing any arrest warrant while disposing of the application under Order 38, Rule 1 CPC, but at the same time, the defendant within o....
In the case of default of deposit of said security, the defendant shall undergo civil imprisonment and thus, the Court decided both the applications under Order 38 Rule 1 and Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. 2. The learned court below has directed by the impugned order that since the defendant has already put in appearance in the court, the Court is not issuing any arrest warrant while disposing of the application under Order 38 Rule 1 CPC., but at the same time, the defendant within one....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
