Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
The controversy is further exemplified by references to Full Bench decisions and High Court rulings, some of which classify Rent Control Courts as courts ["Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426"], while others classify them as persona designata ["L. K. Phanesh Babu VS Mohd. Akbar - Andhra Pradesh"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["L. K. Phanesh Babu VS Mohd. Akbar - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["S. Ganapathi VS N. Kumaraswami - Madras"]- ["BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 259"]- ["BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 258"]- ["Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426"]- ["Ganapathy Ammal VS Chandaresan - Madras"]- ["S. Srinivas Rao VS High Court of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["Amulya Ranjan De VS Pulin Bihari Shaha - Calcutta"]- ["K. K. Hamsa S/o Kizhekkekottyil Kunji Muhammed VS Athikottu Snehaletha W/o Subramanyan - Kerala"]
In the realm of landlord-tenant disputes, Rent Control Courts play a pivotal role in regulating evictions, rent fixation, and related matters under various state Rent Control Acts. A critical question often arises: Whether a Rent Control Court is a persona designata? This distinction is not merely academic; it profoundly affects procedural rights, such as appeals, revisions, and application of limitation laws. Understanding this can help tenants and landlords navigate proceedings effectively.
This article delves into the prevailing legal position, drawing from Supreme Court clarifications and High Court judgments. Note: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The term persona designata refers to an individual appointed in a personal or private capacity to perform a specific function, rather than as a court or tribunal exercising inherent judicial powers. Courts have consistently distinguished this from bodies that function as part of the judicial hierarchy.
As explained in a key judgment, persona designata are persons appointed or described as individuals in their private capacity, not as members of a class or officers exercising judicial powers Kauc Khan VS Soakd of Revenue, M. P. - Madhya Pradesh (1969). In contrast, courts exercise sovereign judicial functions, subject to higher court oversight like revisions under Section 115 CPC.
The predominant view, backed by Supreme Court decisions, is that Rent Control Courts are not persona designata but are courts exercising judicial functions within rent control legislationKUNJALI HASSAN KURUP VS ABDUL SATHR SAIT - 1962 0 Supreme(Ker) 280BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 258BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 259.
These courts, often constituted as Munsiffs or District Judges under Rent Acts (e.g., Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act), perform adjudicatory roles akin to civil courts. Their decisions carry finality and authoritativeness, distinguishing them from mere quasi-judicial bodies Abdul Rehiman VS Hameed Hassan Peruvad - 1995 Supreme(Ker) 232.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed this position:- In BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 258, the Court held that Rent Control Courts under the Kerala Act exercise judicial powers of the State, not as individuals in a private capacity.- Similarly, BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 259 reinforces that, based on statutory notifications, these are courts with judicial functions.- Kauc Khan VS Soakd of Revenue, M. P. - Madhya Pradesh (1969) defines the boundary: Rent Control Courts and appellate authorities are not persona designata but courts Kauc Khan VS Soakd of Revenue, M. P. - Madhya Pradesh (1969).
One judgment notes a nuance: while emphasizing jurisdictional limits, it states the Rent Control Court is only a persona designata in a specific context but clarifies it should not try small cause suits jointly with eviction petitions, leading to remand KUNJALI HASSAN KURUP VS ABDUL SATHR SAIT - 1962 0 Supreme(Ker) 280. However, the overarching trend rejects the persona designata label.
Rent Control Courts are integrated into the judicial hierarchy, subject to revisional jurisdiction by higher courts Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426. This classification impacts:- Revisional Jurisdiction: Orders are amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC, treating them as courts Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426.- Limitation Act: Provisions like Section 5 apply for condonation of delay, as these courts wield judicial powers Faisal VS Vikas Chacko - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 524Abdul Rehiman VS Hameed Hassan Peruvad - 1995 Supreme(Ker) 232.
For instance, in eviction proceedings under Section 11 of the Kerala Act, courts have directed Rent Control Courts to entertain applications under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside ex parte orders and Section 5 of the Limitation Act for delays Abdul Rehiman VS Hameed Hassan Peruvad - 1995 Supreme(Ker) 232Abdul Rehiman VS Hameed Hassan Peruvad - 1995 Supreme(Ker) 233. The court emphasized: the Rent Control Court has the jurisdiction to set aside ex parte orders and to entertain applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act Abdul Rehiman VS Hameed Hassan Peruvad - 1995 Supreme(Ker) 232.
While Supreme Court rulings provide clarity, some High Court decisions highlight ongoing debate, particularly under different state Acts.
Despite this, superior court precedents (especially Supreme Court) prevail, urging practitioners to view them as courts for procedural purposes Sreenivasa Kammath VS Ananda Kammath & Sons - 1991 Supreme(Ker) 400.
Rent Control Courts have limited jurisdiction – they handle specific rent matters and lack full civil court powers. They are not equivalent to regular civil courts but are courts nonetheless for judicial functions Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426.
| Aspect | Persona Designata | Rent Control Court ||--------|-------------------|--------------------|| Nature | Individual in private capacity | Court exercising judicial powers BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 258 || Oversight | Limited | Subject to revision Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426 || Limitation Act | Generally inapplicable | Section 5 applicable Faisal VS Vikas Chacko - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 524 || Supreme Court View | Not applicable | Confirmed as courts Kauc Khan VS Soakd of Revenue, M. P. - Madhya Pradesh (1969) |
In conclusion, Rent Control Courts are typically not persona designata but courts within the judicial framework, as per prevailing Supreme Court wisdom. This ensures procedural safeguards in rent disputes. For tailored advice, engage a legal expert familiar with your state's Rent Act.
References (Selected):1. KUNJALI HASSAN KURUP VS ABDUL SATHR SAIT - 1962 0 Supreme(Ker) 280 – Jurisdictional limits.2. BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 258, BEERA KOYA VS ALI KOYA - 1971 0 Supreme(Ker) 259 – Judicial powers.3. Kauc Khan VS Soakd of Revenue, M. P. - Madhya Pradesh (1969) – Definition of persona designata.4. Balakrishnan VS Mariyumma - 1996 0 Supreme(Ker) 426, Faisal VS Vikas Chacko - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 524 – Procedural laws.5. S. Ganapathy VS N. Kumaraswami - 1975 Supreme(Mad) 295, S. Ganapathi VS N. Kumaraswami - 1975 Supreme(Mad) 297 – Contrasting High Court views.
Stay informed on evolving tenancy laws to protect your rights.
#RentControlLaw, #PersonaDesignata, #LegalInsights
the above section is a persona designata or as the Court. ... Where person is indicated by his official designation in Statute, he acts whether as persona designata or Court depends upon intention of Statute. ... The learned counsel also contended that it is not proper to contend that the Rent Controller Is a persona designata and therefore, there is no bar for transfer of the rent contr....
As far as Rent Controller and appellate authority created under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act are concerned, it is clear that such authorities are persona designata and legislation such as Limitation Act applicable to 'court' cannot be invoked in proceedings before such persona ... I am not inclined to follow this decision in view of the direct authority, both by a single Judge and by a Division Bench of our High Court to the ....
Bhuvanambal Ammal7, a Division Bench of this Court, to which I was a party, held that a Rent Controller appointed as per the provisions in section 2 (3) of the Rent Control Act is a persona designata. ... I am not inclined to follow this decision in view of the direct authority, both by a single Judge and by a Division Bench of our High Court to the effect that a Rent Controller constituted under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent#HL_....
as Rent Control Court". ... In other words, in exercising the revisional power under the section, the Revisional Authority functions as a court and not as a persona designata, while both the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority functions as persona designata. ... Stated briefly, the argument of the learned counsel is that "all though the person appointed to function as the Rent Control #HL_....
as Rent Control Court". ... In other words, in exercising the revisional power under the section, the Revisional Authority functions as a court and not as a persona designata, while both the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority functions as persona designata. ... Stated briefly, the argument of the learned counsel is that "all though the person appointed to function as the Rent Control #HL_....
Abdul Sathr Salt (1963 KLT 407) to contend that the Rent Control Court is only a persona designata. ... In this view of thee matter question as to whether Rent Control court is exercising the jurisdiction as persona designata or not is of no consequence because the Rent Control Court has to exercise the powers under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code ....
Abdul Sathr Salt (1963 KLT 407) to contend that the Rent Control Court is only a persona designata. ... In this view of thee matter question as to whether Rent Control court is exercising the jurisdiction as persona designata or not is of no consequence because the Rent Control Court has to exercise the powers under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code ....
Buvanambal Ammal 84 L.W. 134 a Division Bench of this Court, so which I was a party, held that a Rent Controller appointed as per the provisions in S. 2(3) of the Rent Control Act is a persona designata . ... As far as Rent Controller and appellate authority created under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, are concerned, it is clear that men authorities are persona designata an....
But, in the Full Bench decision, it was also held that Rent Control Court and appellate Authority are persona designata and are not courts. ... Aboobacker (1995 (2) KLT 205 =1995 (2) KLJ 136) wherein it was held that Rent Control Court is not a persona designata and it is a Court for the purpose of Limitation Act. ... In view of the binding pronouncement of the Supreme Court it c....
Dewanjee Abdul Khader sahib), a similar question arose under the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. There, the question was whether the appellate authority appointed by the Government notification is a persona designata or court. ... Dakshina-moorthy), Balasubrahmanyan, J. sitting single considered the question again under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act itself. The question was whether the appellat....
“There is considerable controversy whether a Rent Control Court is a "Court" or merely "persona designata". In any event, the Rent Control Court is not a "civil court" in the strict sense of the term on the scheme of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.”
The Court held, "There is considerable controversy whether a Rent Control Court is a "Court" or merely "persona designata". 11. In Sadanandan (supra) this Court considered the question whether Article 137 of the Limitation Act would apply to a Rent Control Court and for that purpose, can a Rent Control Court be said to be a Civil Court. In any event, the Rent Control Court is not a "civil court" in the strict sense of the term on the scheme of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act."
The question is whether Art. 137 of the Limitation Act would apply to a Rent Control Court, notified under S. 3 of the Act. S.3 provides for appointment of the Rent Control Court by a notification as a person entitled to exercise jurisdiction over a particular local area. There is considerable controversy whether a Rent Control Court is a “Court” or merely “persona designata”. In any event, the Rent Control Court is not a “civil court” in the strict sense of the term on the scheme of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. We are therefore, of the view that the d....
In any event, the Rent Control Court is not a “civil court” in the strict sense of the term on the scheme of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The question is whether Art. 137 of the Limitation Act would apply to a Rent Control Court, notified under S. 3 of the Act. S.3 provides for appointment of the Rent Control Court by a notification as a person entitled to exercise jurisdiction over a particular local area. There is considerable controversy whether a Rent Control Court is a “Court” or merely “persona designata.” We are therefore, of the view that the d....
There is considerable controversy whether a Rent Control Court is a "Court" or merely "persona designata". In any event, the Rent Control Court is not a "civil court" in the strict sense of the term on the scheme of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. We are therefore, of the view that the decision of the Supreme Court in T.P. Kuhaliumma's case cannot be applied to hold that Art.137 of the Limitation Act would apply to initiation of a proceeding before the Rent Control Court. The question is whether Art.137 of the Limitation Act would apply to a Rent Control ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
