Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
The provision also underscores the importance of procedural compliance, as failure to obtain leave under Section 80(2) renders the suit irregular or liable for dismissal ["Secretary Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Una VS Soma Devi - Himachal Pradesh"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["St. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - Kerala"]- ["Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5637"]- ["State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector VS Ramavtar Goyal S/o Buddhulal Goyal - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Rajasthan Housing Board VS Arvind Gupta - Rajasthan"]- ["Secretary Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Una VS Soma Devi - Himachal Pradesh"]- ["Gouranga Das VS Tahasildar, Baliapal - Orissa"]- ["SATYANARAYAN TARAI vs RIKESH PANDA - Orissa"]
Filing a lawsuit against the government or a public officer in India typically requires a mandatory notice under Section 80(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). But what if your situation demands urgent or immediate relief? This is where Section 80(2) of CPC comes into play, offering a crucial exception. If you've ever wondered, what is provision of section 80(2) of C P C, this guide breaks it down comprehensively.
We'll explore the provision's text, requirements, procedural safeguards, judicial interpretations, and practical tips. Whether you're a litigant facing government action or a legal professional, understanding this can prevent procedural pitfalls. Note: This is general information; consult a lawyer for case-specific advice.
Section 80(2) CPC carves out a limited exception to the notice under Section 80(1), introduced by the 1976 Amendment to balance urgency with government protection. It allows suits for urgent or immediate relief against the Government (including Jammu & Kashmir) or public officers (for official acts) without prior notice, but only with the court's prior leave.
The exact text states: (2) A suit to obtain an urgent or immediate relief against the Government... or any public officer... may be instituted with the leave of the Court, without serving any notice as required by sub-section (1); but the Court shall not grant relief in the suit whether interim or otherwise except after giving to the Government or public officer... a reasonable opportunity of showing cause... Provided that the Court shall, if it is satisfied after hearing the parties that no urgent or immediate relief need be granted in the suit, return the plaint for presentation to it after complying with the requirement of sub-section (1). Pradeep Kumar VS Rakesh Kumar Agarwal - 2004 0 Supreme(UK) 393
Key legislative intent: Mitigate hardship in genuine emergencies while preventing surprise litigation, focusing on relief urgency, not case merits. State of A. P. VS Pioneer Builders, A. P. - 2006 8 Supreme 3Patil Automation Private Limited VS Rakheja Engineers Private Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 607Dalveer Singh VS State of U. P. through District Magistrate Kheri - 2021 0 Supreme(All) 108
Leave under Section 80(2) is a condition precedent. Suits filed without it are invalid. The leave of the Court under Section 80 (2) of the Code is a condition precedent and must precede the institution of a suit without serving notice. Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366 The order must show grounds pleaded and application of mind. State of A. P. VS Pioneer Builders, A. P. - 2006 8 Supreme 3
Mere plaint averments of urgency aren't enough; court satisfaction post-hearing is required. No presumption from pendency—courts err by proceeding without deciding. Govt. of Kerala VS Sudhir Kumar Sharma - 2013 6 Supreme 394Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5637
Even with leave, no ex parte interim relief without resolving the Section 80(2) application and hearing the defendant. The Court cannot grant relief, whether interim or otherwise, except after giving the Government or a public officer a reasonable opportunity of showing cause. Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366Patil Automation Private Limited VS Rakheja Engineers Private Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 607
In one case, plaintiffs averred in the plaint that an application under Section 80(2) was filed to dispense with notice against public officials, but the court scrutinized compliance. State of A. P. , Rep. by the District Collector VS A. A. Balaraman - 2023 Supreme(AP) 224
Undecided applications lead to rejection. Suit filed against Government without complying with requirement of Section 80 of CPC, liable to be rejected under Order VII, Rule 11. Maria Felicia D'Souza e Fernandes VS Luis D'Souza - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 908 No waiver by silence; notice is mandatory for government suits. Substantial compliance (e.g., post-filing mediation) fails. Govt. of Kerala VS Sudhir Kumar Sharma - 2013 6 Supreme 394Patil Automation Private Limited VS Rakheja Engineers Private Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 607Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 5637
Courts emphasize: From bare reading of the above provision, it is clear that the notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. is mandatory. Maria Felicia D'Souza e Fernandes VS Luis D'Souza - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 908
To invoke Section 80(2):1. File suit with simultaneous leave application detailing urgency grounds.2. Seek expedited hearing for reasoned order before any relief.3. If leave denied/undecided, prepare for plaint return/rejection.
Defendants: Raise via Order VII Rule 11, insist on Section 80(2) decision.
Courts should: Note urgency in orders, hear defendants pre-relief, return non-urgent plaints.
In summary, while Section 80(2) provides a vital lifeline for pressing matters, its strict safeguards protect public interest. Always verify compliance to avoid procedural dismissals. This overview draws from key judgments; for tailored guidance, seek professional legal counsel.
References: Cited document IDs correspond to case authorities like Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366, Govt. of Kerala VS Sudhir Kumar Sharma - 2013 6 Supreme 394, etc.
#CPCSection80, #CivilProcedureIndia, #LegalNoticeCPC
80(2) C.P.C. by trial court finding that there is no necessity for any urgent relief in suit matter – Courts should always bear ... 80(2) C.P.C. to institute suit without compliance of requirement of two months prior notice in writing - Section shall not be read ... Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 80, (1), (2) - Rejection of leave - Interim injunction - Pertaining to rejection of leave under Section ... There is failure on the part of the trial court to understand the real spirit under Section....
An analysis of the provision shows that section 80 CPC is in two parts : section 80(1) and section 80(2). ... 2(17) CPC for purposes of section 80 CPC. ... Next, it is argued, that the term "public officer" as appearing in section 80 CPC has been defined in section 2(17) of the CPC itself, which provision rea....
The appellants were fully aware of the said provision and accordingly, an application was made under Section 80 (2) of the Code for grant of such leave, which was refused. ... The leave was granted to the plaintiff as required under Section 80(2) of CPC. ... Thus, in conformity therewith, by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 the existing Section 80 was renumbered as Section 80(1) a....
At para No.VIII of the plaint, it is stated that defendant Nos.1 and 2 being public officials a petition under Section 80(2) C.P.C. was filed dispensing with notice contemplated under Section 80(1) C.P.C. ... Thus, an application under Section 80(2) C.P.C. must have been filed by the original plaintiff before the trial Court. ... On considering this submission it is to be stated that as noticed earlier, in the plaint it is mentioned....
80(2)(d) of the Act. ... Accordingly, it would not be hit by the provisions of Section 80(P)(4) of the Act. In that case, deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by that Id. AO to Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd by applying the provisions of Section 80P(4) of the Act. ... As per the provisions of section 80P(1) of the Act, the income referred to in sub-section (2) to section 80P shall be allowed as a deduction....
80(2)(d) of the Act. ... Accordingly, it would not be hit by the provisions of Section 80(P)(4) of the Act. In that case, deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by that Id. AO to Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd by applying the provisions of Section 80P(4) of the Act. ... As per the provisions of section 80P(1) of the Act, the income referred to in sub-section (2) to section 80P shall be allowed as a deduction....
He submits that initially in C.P.C., the identical provision is there in Section 80 which was subsequently amended and Section 80 (2) was inserted wherein discreation was given to Court for waiving the burden of notice in urgent cases. ... He submits that the aforesaid amendment was effected from 01.02.1977 while the provision of Section 50 of the Rajasthan Housing Board Act is of 1970, therefore considering the subsequent provision....
there in Section 80 which was subsequently amended and Section 80 (2) was inserted wherein ... (2) of Section 80 CPC. ... (supra) co-ordinate Bench of this Court considering the provision enshrined in Section 80 (2) of the proviso appended to subsection (2), the plaint had to be Proviso appended to Sub-section (2) of ....
Page 8 of 9 sub-section (2) of section 80 CPC into the provision of section 53B of the Delhi Development Act. ... The aforesaid provision of section 53B was enacted long after enactment of the provision of sub-section (2) of section 80 of the CPC. ... The legislature was aware of the said provision of sub- sect....
Page 8 of 9 sub-section (2) of section 80 CPC into the provision of section 53B of the Delhi Development Act. ... The aforesaid provision of section 53B was enacted long after enactment of the provision of sub-section (2) of section 80 of the CPC. ... The legislature was aware of the said provision of sub- sect....
The provision of Section 80 of Cr.P.C. is also important for the present purpose and it runs as under: "80. When a warrant of arrest is executed outside the district in which it was issued, the person arrested shall, unless the Court which issued the warrant is within thirty kilometres of the place of arrest or is nearer than the Executive Magistrate or District Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the arrest was made, or unless security is taken under section 71, be taken before such Magistrate or District Superin....
21. Indeed, Section 249 of the Act does put an absolute embargo on filing of a suit or other civil proceedings against a Panchayat, etc., until the expiration of one month after the affected person's issuing a statutory notice. Having conceded to the said extent, I must hasten to observe that the alleged forceful eviction of the petitioners on 26.12.2014 is a lis pendence development. In this regard, we may examine Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, which provides that if any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any ot....
From bare reading of the above provision, it is clear that the notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. is mandatory.
8. The provision of Section 109 of the Act of 1994 is akin to unamended Section 80 CPC before Section 80(2) was not inserted. The provisions contained in Section 109 of the Act of 1994, cannot be said to be illegal or arbitrary depriving of any substantive right to have judicial review.
The nature of power exercised and the character of orders passed which are to be challenged in the Suit also would militate against the Application of Section 80 C.P.C., to such cases. That being so, application of the provisions under Section 80, C.P.C. is excluded by reason of the special provision made under Section 70 of the Act." In the aforesaid Judgment, it has been made clear that when a statute itself has provision for filing a Suit, that alone will govern the mandatory procedure to be followed and the Division Bench of this Court has taken the same view in Tholapp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
