Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Phone Number of Surendra Bhilwara - The provided sources do not contain any direct or specific phone number associated with Surendra Bhilwara. The documents mention multiple individuals named Surendra or Surendra Kumar, but none explicitly link to a phone number for Surendra Bhilwara himself.
Main Points and Insights:
Some documents mention mobile numbers used in investigations or related to other individuals (e.g., 9709303397, 9921442642), but none are associated with Surendra Bhilwara specifically.
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["SMT. PAWAN DEVI DEVEN BAFANA ALIAS PAWAN JAIN Vs. ACHARYA BHIKSHU SAMADHI STHAL SANSTHAN - Rajasthan"]- ["Sachin Makade vs Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi - Delhi (2022)"]- ["Surendra Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]- ["Surendra Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["Madan Lal VS State - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["Hem Raj VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["STARNET REAL ESTATE AND PROJECTS LTD. Vs. SHRI CHANDI DAS - Rajasthan"]- ["HARISH KUMAR YADAV S/O MADAN LAL YADAV Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"]- ["SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE - Rajasthan"]- ["KANSINGH @ KANHA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan"]
Note: None of these references provide a specific phone number for Surendra Bhilwara.
In today's digital age, people often turn to public legal documents to uncover personal details like phone numbers, especially in cases involving telecom evidence. But can you really find someone's contact information, such as Surendra Bhilwara's phone number, buried in court judgments? This question arises frequently in legal research, investigations, or even personal inquiries. A common query we encounter is: Tell me the phone number of Surendra Bhilwara.
This blog post dives deep into legal records from Indian courts, analyzing whether such information exists. Spoiler: Based on available documents, there's no record. We'll explore why, cite specific cases, and discuss broader implications for privacy and accessing telecom data. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific cases.
Court records, particularly those involving criminal investigations, often reference call detail records (CDRs), interceptions, and mobile numbers as evidence. However, personal phone numbers of non-parties or unrelated individuals rarely appear unless directly relevant to the case. A thorough review of provided legal documents yields no mention of Surendra Bhilwara's phone numberManjit Singh @ Mange VS CBI - 2011 1 Supreme 449MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1Sachin Makade vs Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi - Delhi (2022).
Key findings include:- Documents detail intercepted calls and CDRs for various suspects, such as Manjit Singh @ Mange VS CBI - 2011 1 Supreme 449 and MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHID VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - 2012 6 Supreme 1, but none link to Surendra Bhilwara.- Cases discuss phone numbers like Sachin Makade vs Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi - Delhi (2022), Sanjay Jain VS Enforcement Directorate - 2024 0 Supreme(Del) 515, and Vikas Verma @ Vicky VS State of Rajasthan - 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 1471, tied to abduction, ransom, or conspiracy charges, yet Surendra Bhilwara is absent Sidharath Bansal VS State The Government of NCT - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1001Gurpreet alias Goldi VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2014 0 Supreme(HP) 818.
This absence doesn't mean the number doesn't exist—only that it's not in these records. Courts typically redact or omit irrelevant personal data to protect privacy under laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000, and constitutional rights.
Legal proceedings involving phones focus on evidentiary value, not directories. For example:- In interception-related matters, numbers like Tata Press VS Mahanagar Telephone Nigam LTD. , Bombay - 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 775, Jameela VS Union of India - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 792, and Surendra Singh Rautela @ Surendra Singh Bengali: Mohd. Anis: State Of Jharkhand VS State Of Bihar: State Of Bihar (Now State Of Jharkhand) : Surendra Singh Rautela @ Surendra Singh Bengali - 2001 8 Supreme 524 are analyzed for conspiracy or murder links, but no reference to Surendra Bhilwara appears Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq VS State of NCT of Delhi - 2011 5 Supreme 646Santokh Singh VS Divisional Engineer, Telephones, Shillong and others - 1989 0 Supreme(Gau) 197.- A murder case details circumstantial evidence without mentioning him Gajraj VS State (NCT) of Delhi - 2011 6 Supreme 504.
Exact quote from records: The documents detail various cases involving intercepted calls, call detail records, and phone numbers of different individuals... but none include Surendra Bhilwara’s name or number. This pattern holds across 18+ references.
Bhilwara, Rajasthan, features in several judgments mentioning Surendra, potentially related names. However, no phone numbers surface:- In a taxi driver murder near Meja Dam, Bhilwara: At the time of engaging the taxi, the accused Surendra Kumar impersonated himself to be Arvind Singh Bishnoi. SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE. No contact details provided.- Property dispute: Kanchi Construction Private Limited, Bhilwara through Director Sumit Surana S/o Shri Surendra Singh Surana. SUNDER LAL HIRAN vs M/S. KANCHI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,and ORS. Focuses on registration, not phones.- Divorce appeal: Surendra Singh S/o Hari Singh Rajput... Nathji Ka Kheda, Tehsil Sahda, District Bhilwara. SURENDRA SINGH vs BHAGWAT KANWAR. Address given, but no number.
These cases highlight how courts mention names and locations without personal identifiers like phones, respecting privacy.
Indian courts handle telecom data under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and IT Act provisions. Sections like 66C/D (identity theft) appear in cases with impersonation via calls Aditya Kumar VS State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 88. Quote: while using the mobile number 9709303397 the user had called the then Director General of Police... to pressurize. But unrelated to Surendra Bhilwara.
Other examples:- POCSO quashing: Inquiry via phone number 9537246106, audio recorded, but no link SUJATA SURAJ BHATIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1425. Court stressed lack of component of 'sexual intention' for summons.- Murder conviction: Witness denies calls, no numbers tied to suspects State of Karnataka VS Siju Kurian S/o. Kuriyan - 2020 Supreme(Kar) 47.- Acquittal in conspiracy: Witness had not disclosed his own phone number to the police STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS ASHOKKacharu s/o Bhausaheb Sonawane VS State of Maharashtra - 2011 Supreme(Bom) 505.
Key takeaway: Phones enter records only as evidence (e.g., CDRs under CrPC Section 91). Private numbers require warrants; public access is limited via RTI or judgments on portals like Indian Kanoon.
Revealing personal numbers without cause violates Article 21 (right to privacy). Courts quash irrelevant summons, as in POCSO cases SUJATA SURAJ BHATIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1425. Exceptions:- Relevant evidence: CDRs in IPC 302/120B (murder/conspiracy) Gajraj VS State (NCT) of Delhi - 2011 6 Supreme 504Sidharath Bansal VS State The Government of NCT - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1001.- Redaction: Non-essential data omitted.
Limitations:- Documents scope-bound; external records (telecom databases) needed.- No cross-references to Surendra Bhilwara.
If seeking verification:1. Official channels: Telecom providers via court order (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India guidelines).2. RTI Act: For public servants' official numbers, not private.3. Private investigators: Licensed, compliant with DPDP Act, 2023.4. Public directories: Ethical, non-intrusive searches.
Caution: Unauthorized access risks IPC 419/420 (cheating/impersonation) Aditya Kumar VS State of Bihar - 2023 Supreme(Pat) 88.
No legal document reveals Surendra Bhilwara's phone number—consistent across telecom, Bhilwara, and criminal cases Manjit Singh @ Mange VS CBI - 2011 1 Supreme 449SURENDRA KUMAR @ SONU Vs STATE. This underscores privacy safeguards in Indian jurisprudence.
Takeaways:- Court records prioritize evidence over personal directories.- Always seek authorized routes for info.- Privacy trumps curiosity; misuse invites legal trouble.
For deeper research, explore judgment portals. This analysis is informational only—seek professional legal counsel. Stay informed, respect privacy.
#CourtRecords #LegalPrivacy #TelecomLaw
Babulal S/o Rajmal Singhvi, Ashaoli / Bhilwara Office Shri Acharya Bhikshu Samadhi Sthal Sansthan, Siriyari Mobile No. 9414148414 62. ... Prakash Chandra S/o Vijaylal Sutaria, Resident Bhilwara Office Shri Acharya Bhikshu Samadhi Sthal Sansthan, Siriyari Mobile No. 9352110040. 42. ... Surendra Kumar Surana S/o Samapat Raj Surana, Surana Constructions, 768, Singhapur, Orcate, Third Road, Khar (West), Mumbai 4000252. 3. Loon Karan Chhajer S/o Mool Chand, 11 Shriram Market, Court Gate, Bikaner (334001). ... Surendra Kumar S....
Consequent upon information / documents from the Laptop & mobile phone and other material, Barun Surendra Chauhan was arrested on 12.02.2020; h) during investigation, mobile number 9921442642 used by Barun Chauhan was found in his possession and was also seized alongwith its ... During investigation, they informed they book orders from Singapore for foreign countries through Lutz: Accordingly, mobile phone and laptop of Sachin Makade, Barun Chauhan and Tejas Patel were seized vide Panchnama dated 11.02.2020; g) during ....
Hospital, Bhilwara. On checking the mobile phone found on the dead body, it came to light that the same was of one Mohd. Hussain. His brother Nasir Mohd. was informed. He approached the Police Station Mandal and lodged the report Ex. P/3. The witness prepared the Supurdginama Lash (Ex. ... Hussain for going towards Pansal Chauraha, Bhilwara. At the time of engaging the taxi, the accused Surendra Kumar impersonated himself to be Arvind Singh Bishnoi. ... Hussain, a taxi driver, was murdered near the Meja Dam, District #HL....
Hospital, Bhilwara. On checking the mobile phone found on the dead body, it came to light that the same was of one Mohd. Hussain. His brother Nasir Mohd. was informed. He approached the Police Station Mandal and lodged the report Ex.P/3. ... Hussain for going towards Pansal Chauraha, Bhilwara. At the time of engaging the taxi, the accused Surendra Kumar impersonated himself to be Arvind Singh Bishnoi. ... Hussain, a taxi driver, was murdered near the Meja Dam, District Bhilwara. The Investigating Office....
Hospital, Bhilwara. On checking the mobile phone found on the dead body, it came to light that the same was of one Mohd. Hussain. His brother Nasir Mohd. was informed. He approached the Police Station Mandal and lodged the report Ex. P/3. The witness prepared the Supurdginama Lash (Ex. ... Hussain for going towards Pansal Chauraha, Bhilwara. At the time of engaging the taxi, the accused Surendra Kumar impersonated himself to be Arvind Singh Bishnoi. ... Hussain, a taxi driver, was murdered near the Meja Dam, District #HL....
Kanchi Construction Private Limited, Bhilwara through Director Sumit Surana S/o Shri Surendra Singh Surana, R/o ... Kanchi Construction Private Limited, Bhilwara through its Director, Sumit Surana S/o Shri Surendra Singh Surana, aged Basant Vihar, Bhilwara. ... Sub Registrar, Registration Office, Bhilwara, District Bhilwara (Raj.) ... The Sub Registrar, Registration Office, Bhilwara, District Bhilwara#....
The witness Surendra Ram P.W.43, who sold the SIM to Gehrilal did not specify the number thereof in his evidence. ... 21. ... Furthermore, the IMEI number of the mobile phone recovered from the accused was not specified by the Investigating Officer in the seizure memo. ... They contended that the SIM inserted in the mobile phone was issued by P.W.43 Surendra Sharma in the name of one Narayan, who was examined as P.W. 35 during trial but did not support the prosecution case. ... As the ....
herein was set aside and a further direction was given to restore the divorce application on its original number ... Appeal No. 311/2022 Surendra Singh S/o Hari Singh Rajput, Aged About 32 Years, The instant misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellant Surendra ... Singh for assailing the order dated 25.11.2021 passed Nathji Ka Kheda, Tehsil Sahda, District Bhilwara ----Appellant
Gagan Singh S/o Surendra Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Meelo Ki Dhani, District Jhunjhunu, Raj.-333001. (Application Id No.177196) 93. ... Sohan Pal S/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Phephana, Teh. Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.) 335523 (Application Id No. 173975). 116. ... Kotri, District Bhilwara (Raj.) 311603 (Application Id No. 147969). 124. Sonu Sharma D/o Bhagwati Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gega Ka Khera, Teh. Kotri, District Bhilwara (Raj.) 311603 (Application Id No. 153071). ... Thuliya ....
It has been alleged that on the basis of confidential information that while using the mobile number 9709303397 the user had called the then Director General of Police (DGP), Bihar, Patna and other senior officers on mobile phone and Whatsapp call to pressurize for doing an administrative act/taking ... The petitioner made a complaint of the said SHO to his IG, Sri Amit Lodha and requested him to remove the said Surendra Singh from the duty of the Officer-in-Charge. But, no action was taken by Sri Amit Lodha. ... Then, the petitioner lear....
On 12.03.2018, I the complainant inquired another parent on a phone number 9537246106, and information was given to me on the condition that, I will not tell anyone else regarding the same. The audio recording of the same is also available with me. We came to know about the same when we called and inquired regarding the same to the other parents. The same is produced in a CD vide the additional evidence list along with this complaint.
It is elicited that on 10.01.2012, he had called the said Kunjali, but he did not make any call to the said Kunjali on 19.01.2012. It is suggested that his father quarreled with the family members and came to Sagar, the same was denied. He cannot tell who gave the phone number of him to Stanie. He admits that, when he gave the missing complaint, he did not suspect anyone, but suspected the person who was working with him was missing.
However, the said witness in his cross-examination deposed that he had never stayed with Anita and Shashi Bhushan at Jaipur. He had not disclosed his own phone number to the police. He had disclosed the phone number from which he had received call from his brother, but the said number was not mentioned in his statement Exhibit D-4. His brother Shashi Bhushan had made a phone-call to him on his mobile-phone from some other number, but he could not tell the said number.
Bharti Yadav also asked Nilam Katara as to whether the boys (Bharat Diwakar and Gaurav Gupta) had not told her that her brothers Vikas and Vishal Yadav had taken Nitish Katara away from the wedding. 17. Nilam Katara then took Bharti Yadav’s phone number from Bharat Diwakar and called her from the landline phone. Bharti Yadav disclosed that she was also unsuccessful in reaching Nitish Katara.
He also stated that he is not having phone facility and cannot tell the phone number on which he contacted with PW2 Ravindra. He further stated that after receipt of phone call from Sonewadi, he did not go to Sonewadi personally. He also stated that the distance between Sonewadi and Arangaon is about 2 to 3 Kms.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
