Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
In financial and decree-related matters, he sought to set off decrees against liabilities, asserting his legal rights under Order 21, Rule 18 ["Girdhar Das VS Triloki Nath - Allahabad"].
Analysis and conclusion:
In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, names like Triloki Nath Singh appear across diverse legal disputes, spanning criminal convictions, academic appointments, and administrative inquiries. Whether you're researching Triloki Nath Singh legal cases for academic purposes, professional reference, or general curiosity, understanding these judgments provides valuable insights into procedural fairness, circumstantial evidence, and regulatory compliance. This post dissects the primary cases associated with the query Triloki Nath Singh, drawing from court documents and related sources to offer a comprehensive overview.
Note: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific guidance.
One of the most compelling cases revolves around the death of Tirloki Nath, ruled as murder rather than suicide. Found hanging in his home, evidence pointed to strangulation followed by staging the scene. Tirloki Nath shared a bedroom with his wife, Gargi Devi, and had voiced fears for his life, highlighting strained relations and a potential motive. The court noted Gargi Devi's failure to explain the circumstances, leading to her conviction under Section 302 IPC as the principal offender, possibly aided by others whose roles remained unproven. GARGI VS STATE OF HARYANA - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1042
Key findings include:- Last words of Tirloki Nath expressing fear from his wife.- Motive established through marital discord.- Gargi Devi's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. dismissed as false implication.
Gargi Devi did not explain the circumstances leading to his death and was found culpable for murder. GARGI VS STATE OF HARYANA - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1042 This reliance on circumstantial evidence underscores how courts typically evaluate motive, opportunity, and unexplained conduct in homicide cases.
Shifting to civil matters, Dr. Triloki Nath Singh's appointment as Reader in Linguistics at the University of Lucknow's Hindi Department was upheld. The selection followed a proper process by a constituted committee, confirming the post was not hybrid or requiring undue linguistic expertise beyond his qualifications. No irregularities or conspiracies were found involving appellants. Triloki Nath Singh VS Bhagwan Din Misra - 1990 0 Supreme(SC) 418
The appointment was lawful and that the position was not a combined or hybrid post requiring linguistic expertise, indicating that Dr. Singh held a legitimate academic position. Triloki Nath Singh VS Bhagwan Din Misra - 1990 0 Supreme(SC) 418 This case illustrates principles of transparent recruitment in higher education, emphasizing procedural adherence.
In another instance, Shri Triloki Nath Singh, as school manager, faced allegations of collusion and lapses. A departmental inquiry revealed misconduct by officials, but no evidence linked open-market appellants to conspiracy. Only the manager was accused in the criminal case, with no action against others. Radhey Shyam Yadav & Anr. Etc. VS State of U. P. - 2024 1 Supreme 1
No material linking the appellants (applicants from the open market) to the misconduct or criminal conspiracy. Radhey Shyam Yadav & Anr. Etc. VS State of U. P. - 2024 1 Supreme 1 This highlights the importance of evidence-based accountability in administrative probes.
Related sources reveal promotion battles in educational institutions. In one judgment, the promotion of Triloki Nath was directed for the post vacated by Basudeo Singh's retirement under Chapter III, Regulation II of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act. The court found an erroneous direct appointment to a promotion quota post, ordering reconsideration. JAI KUMAR SINGH VS DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS - 2001 Supreme(All) 414
As far as the direction with regard to the resolution being passed for promotion in favour of Triloki Nath, no error can be found. However, the promotion of Triloki Nath has to be on the post which fell vacant due to retirement of Basudeo Singh. JAI KUMAR SINGH VS DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS - 2001 Supreme(All) 414 Such rulings stress quota interpretations, aiding educators navigating service regulations.
Disciplinary proceedings against a Triloki Nath (AFO) involved revising assessment bills and penalties like pension cuts. One order imposing a cut was upheld, while a suspension-related directive was quashed for lacking a formal suspension order. Triloki Nath VS BSES Rajdhani Power Limited - 2017 Supreme(Del) 362
The absence of a suspension order renders the order dated 7.2.2006 illegal, while the order dated 6.1.2006 imposing a pension cut is upheld. Triloki Nath VS BSES Rajdhani Power Limited - 2017 Supreme(Del) 362 This case exemplifies DESU regulations on penalties post-inquiry.
Property cases feature prominently, such as ownership claims via mutations and sales. In a landlord-tenant ejectment suit, Triloki Nath's involvement in sub-tenancy and res judicata defenses was examined. The court clarified that judgments, not decrees alone, create res judicata bars, upholding ejectment. TULISON TRADERS VS GURDIT SINGH - 1973 Supreme(Del) 216
Additionally, partition suits invoked Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, stressing plaintiffs' burden of proof even sans written statements. Devshi Gangaji Rabadiya VS Jayantibhai Jerambhai Sureja Assertion made in plaint is not a proof and burden lay upon plaintiff to prove facts. Devshi Gangaji Rabadiya VS Jayantibhai Jerambhai Sureja
Across these cases:- Circumstantial evidence suffices for convictions when direct proof is absent, as in the murder trial. GARGI VS STATE OF HARYANA - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1042- Appointments and promotions demand procedural purity, with courts intervening on quota misapplications. Triloki Nath Singh VS Bhagwan Din Misra - 1990 0 Supreme(SC) 418JAI KUMAR SINGH VS DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS - 2001 Supreme(All) 414- Inquiries protect uninvolved parties, requiring concrete links to misconduct. Radhey Shyam Yadav & Anr. Etc. VS State of U. P. - 2024 1 Supreme 1
Other references, like election petitions K. Kamaraja Nadar: Mariappan: M. R. Masani VS Kunju Theivar: V. R. Nedunchezhiyan: Eleption Tribunal, Ranchi - 1958 0 Supreme(SC) 59, add procedural context but are tangential.
These cases generally demonstrate judicial emphasis on evidence, procedure, and equity. For those in education, administration, or facing similar disputes, they offer precedents on accountability and rights.
References:1. GARGI VS STATE OF HARYANA - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1042 - Murder details.2. Triloki Nath Singh VS Bhagwan Din Misra - 1990 0 Supreme(SC) 418 - Appointment validity.3. Radhey Shyam Yadav & Anr. Etc. VS State of U. P. - 2024 1 Supreme 1 - Inquiry outcomes.4. JAI KUMAR SINGH VS DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS - 2001 Supreme(All) 414 - Promotion quotas.5. Triloki Nath VS BSES Rajdhani Power Limited - 2017 Supreme(Del) 362 - Disciplinary penalties.6. TULISON TRADERS VS GURDIT SINGH - 1973 Supreme(Del) 216 - Property disputes.7. Devshi Gangaji Rabadiya VS Jayantibhai Jerambhai Sureja - CPC principles.
Stay informed on evolving Indian law—bookmark for updates!
#TrilokiNathSingh #IPC302 #IndianLaw
At that time, Hanuman Nath said to Triloki to bring gun, upon which, his wife and sons also instigated him to bring gun and on their instigation, Trilok Nath brought gun and fired at Vijay with the intention to kill. ... At the instance of Triloki Nath, spot was visited and spot map was prepared. 10.8. On 10.06.2025, X-Ray of Mahender Kumar was got conducted in Arki Hospital and report was obtained. The injuries found on the persons, were declared to be simple. ... On 09.06.2025, Hanuman Nath#....
As far as the direction with regard to the resolution being passed for promotion in favour of Triloki Nath, no error can be found. However, the promotion of Triloki Nath has to be on the post which fell vacant due to retirement of Basudeo Singh. ... Triloki Nath further claimed that his promotion should be approved from 31. 1. 1995. ... The appointment of respondent No. 4 being on the post of Basudeo Singh, which fell under the promotion quota, was w....
Since informant Triloki Nath was having, injuries, a Majroobi Chiththhi was prepared and consequently Triloki Nath was sent to the Ursuta Hospital through Constable Suraj Singh who has filed on affidavit. Inspite of his filing of aftidavit the Trial Judge has mentioned him as P.W. 4. ... Rastogi it is apparent that the victim Triloki Nath was carried to the hospital through Constable alongwith a Majroobi Chitthi. ... Trilok Nath remained at the pakau....
... ( 5 ) SINCE informant Triloki Nath was having, injuries, a Majroobi Chiththhi was prepared and consequently Triloki Nath was sent to the Ursuta Hospital through Constable Suraj Singh who has filed on affidavit. ... C. and also caused injuries to Triloki Nath Verma and thereby committed an offence punishable U/s 323/34 I. P. C. ... Rastogi it is apparent that the victim Triloki Nath was carried to the hospital through Constable a....
suit property in favour of Triloki Nath Sharma; Triloki Nath Sharma thus steps into the shoes of Kalu Dass and Shambhoo Singh recognizing the status of Kalu Dass as his landlord has little option but to recognize Triloki Nath that his son has already died and he is bequeathing this property in favour of Triloki Nath Sharma. ... PW-2 has produced the summoned record showing the mutation of the property in favour of #HL_S....
Shambhoo Singh Verma has recognized the Kalu Dass as his landlord/owner; in fact he has admitted that Kalu Dass inducted him in the property along with Mahant Buddha Dass as a tenant; Kalu Dass vide Will dated 15.08.1974 had bequeathed this suit property in favour of Triloki Nath Sharma; Triloki Nath ... Sharma thus steps into the shoes of Kalu Dass and Shambhoo Singh recognizing the status of Kalu Dass as his landlord has little option but to recognize Triloki #HL_ST....
Relying on the contention of Shri Jagga Singh, Shri Triloki Nath, AFO (D) KRN, revised the assessment bill from Rs.7,17,746.42 to Rs.6544.30. Bonafides of Shri Jagga Singh and the legality of the rent Agreement were got authenticated from AGM(A) through Legal Cell. ... Triloki Nath vide order No. VC/7-9/97-Vig./TPS/221 Dated 23/7/99. ... AND WHEREAS, aggrieved by the aforesaid penalty Sh. Triloki Nath filed a writ petition in the Hon’ble High Court. ....
Triloki Nath, AFO. ... Relying on the contention of Shri Jagga Singh, Shri Triloki Nath, AFO (D) KRN, revised the assessment bill from Rs.7,17,746.42 to Rs.6544.30. ... Triloki Nath vide order No. VC/7-9/97-Vig./TPS/221 Dated 23/7/99. AND WHEREAS, aggrieved by the aforesaid penalty Sh. Triloki Nath filed a writ petition in the Hon‟ble High Court. ... Triloki Nath as fully proved in disag....
Triloki Nath, AFO. ... Relying on the contention of Shri Jagga Singh, Shri Triloki Nath, AFO (D) KRN, revised the assessment bill from Rs.7,17,746.42 to Rs.6544.30. ... Triloki Nath vide order No. VC/7-9/97-Vig./TPS/221 Dated 23/7/99. AND WHEREAS, aggrieved by the aforesaid penalty Sh. Triloki Nath filed a writ petition in the Hon‟ble High Court. ... Triloki Nath as fully proved in disag....
Jagdev Singh also appeared as Public Witness 2 and stated that in 1950 Laxmi Sodawater Factory was purchased by Triloki Nath on the basis of deed which was written by Triloki Nath to which he and Onkar Singh were the marginal witnesses. ... He contacted Onkar Singh in that respect and Onkar Singh sold his business, Laxmi Sodawater Factory, which he was carrying on in the disputed premises in favour of Triloki Nath ....
In case of Triloki Nath Singh v. Anirudh Singh (Supra), wherein Paras-21 to 23 read as under:— In the present case, the partition suit was filed in 1978 and after the decision of the trial Court, the matter went in first appeal and eventually, Second Appeal No. 495/86 before the High Court.
In the present case, the partition suit was filed in 1978 and after the decision of the trial Court, the matter went in first appeal and eventually, Second Appeal No. 495/86 before the High Court. In case of Triloki Nath Singh v. Anirudh Singh (Supra), wherein Paras-21 to 23 read as under:
iii. Triloki Nath Singh vs. Anirudh Singh (Dead) Through Legal representatives and Others, 2020 (6) SCC 629.” Muktar Steels Private Limited and Others, 2013(16) SCC 607.
5. 2018 (1) CWC 602 (DB) M/s.Super Sales India Ltd. Vs. CESTAT 8. W.P.No.29258 of 2019 K.Ayyavu & 42 others Vs.The District Collector and Sole Arbitrator 6. 2020 (6) SCC 626 Triloki Nath Singh Vs. Anirudh Singh (D) Thr. Lrs and others 7. W.A.Nos.2627 to 2637 and 2641 to 2644 of 2019 S.John Vs. Regional Officer, National Highways Authority of India.
In course of the same, they contacted him and searched the premises of Harakh Singh in which he resided along with his sons. Two independent witnesses namely, Mahendra Pratap Singh (PW-20) formal and Triloki Nath Singh (PW-19) were summoned. The house was searched in the presence of the witnesses and a number of articles were recovered of which a seizure list was prepared. He along with Rajendra Sah and Lakhan Mehra signed on the seizure as also Harakh Singh, Appellant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
