Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Active or Direct Act Requirement: Multiple sources emphasize that for proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC to be maintainable in cases of suicide, there must be evidence of an active or direct act by the accused that led the deceased to commit suicide, with the act intended to push the deceased into such a position Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Parimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati, Romit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad.
Evidence of Instigation or Abetment: Courts have considered whether the accused actively instigated, conspired, or harassed the deceased. The presence of a suicide note, video, or audio recordings blaming the accused can support claims of instigation or abetment, making Section 156(3) proceedings more likely to be maintainable INDPHC040074012022, Parimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati, MULCHAND S/O NAMOMAL SETIYA vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS JARIPATKA NAGPUR - Bombay.
Recorded Video and Blame: In the present case, the deceased recorded a video blaming the accused brothers for harassment, which was used as evidence indicating a direct link to the act of suicide MULCHAND S/O NAMOMAL SETIYA vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS JARIPATKA NAGPUR - Bombay, Parimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati.
Legal Precedents: Courts have held that mere allegations or suspicion are insufficient; there must be clear evidence of active acts or direct instigation. For example, if the deceased did not disclose intent or if there is no material showing the accused's active role, proceedings under Section 156(3) may not be maintainable Ambesh Mani Tripathi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Romit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad.
Case-specific Factors: The case details reveal that the deceased had recorded messages blaming the accused, suggesting active harassment or blackmail, which supports the maintainability of Section 156(3) application. Conversely, cases where the deceased's conduct was hypersensitive or where no active or direct act is proven tend to be dismissed State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station- Mohan Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VS Bhagabai W/o. Ashwini Kumar Thakur - Chhattisgarh.
When the deceased recorded a video or message prior to suicide blaming the accused, and evidence suggests active harassment or instigation, proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC are likely maintainable. This aligns with judicial emphasis on establishing a direct or active act that contributed to the suicide Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Parimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati.
Conversely, if there is no clear evidence of active or direct acts by the accused, or if the deceased's actions suggest hypersensitivity without active harassment, the application under Section 156(3) may be challenged or dismissed Ambesh Mani Tripathi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Romit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad.
In summary, the recorded video where the deceased blames the accused, coupled with evidence of harassment or blackmail, supports the maintainability of Section 156(3) CrPC application in this case.
References:- Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - Allahabad- Parimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati- MULCHAND S/O NAMOMAL SETIYA vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS JARIPATKA NAGPUR - Bombay_HC_HCBM040074012022- Ambesh Mani Tripathi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad- Romit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad- State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station- Mohan Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VS Bhagabai W/o. Ashwini Kumar Thakur - Chhattisgarh
In tragic cases of suicide, families often seek justice by alleging abetment or incitement. A critical question arises: The Deceased Recorded his Video before Committing Suicide and then Committed Suicide, in this Case will the Application of 156(3) Cr.p.c be Maintainable? This post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from judicial precedents and statutory provisions to explain when such applications hold ground.
Suicide cases frequently involve emotional turmoil, but courts scrutinize evidence carefully to determine if police investigation is warranted. Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) empowers magistrates to direct police to register an FIR and investigate cognizable offenses. When a video recorded by the deceased exists, it can serve as pivotal circumstantial evidence. However, maintainability depends on whether it establishes a prima facie case of abetment under Section 306 IPC or related offenses. This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Section 156(3) CrPC allows a magistrate to order investigation into cognizable offenses without prior police registration of an FIR. Courts emphasize this as a preliminary step, not a full trial. The courts have consistently held that the initiation of a police investigation under this section is a preliminary step, and the court does not assess the evidence in detail at this stage but only considers whether there are sufficient grounds for investigation Upender Shishodiya VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2004.
Key requirements include:- Cognizable offense: Abetment to suicide (Section 306 IPC) qualifies.- Prima facie case: Based on materials like videos, notes, or circumstances suggesting instigation Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997.- Magistrate's discretion: Ordered if reasonable suspicion exists, not mere conjecture.
A video made by the deceased before suicide can reveal mental state, pressures, or accusations. The existence of a video recorded by the deceased prior to his death can be a significant piece of circumstantial evidence... such a video can reveal the mental state, motives, or circumstances leading to the suicide, and may also contain indications of incitement or abetment Upender Shishodiya VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2004.
In one case, deceased has video-graphed a message in mobile blaming both brothers solely for his suicide... due to persistent threat and blackmailing recorded message from his mobile blaming accused MULCHAND S/O NAMOMAL SETIYA vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS JARIPATKA NAGPUR - Bombay. This supported investigation, highlighting how videos blaming specific individuals can justify Section 156(3) proceedings.
Courts recognize videos as relevant if they indicate:- Harassment or blackmail.- Direct instigation.- Motive linking accused to suicide Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997.
The main legal finding is affirmative: generally maintainable if the video suggests abetment. The Court recognizes that a video recording by the deceased before suicide can be relevant evidence and may justify a police investigation Upender Shishodiya VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2004.
Supporting cases:- Transcripts of videos attached to petitions have been considered, as in Along with the said application the petitioner placed on record the transcript of the video recorded by the deceased on his mobile phone on 29.11.2019 Sandeep Kumar @ Sunny vs State Of Punjab & Another - 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2011 - 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2011.- Evidence of active acts like dowry harassment leading to suicide bolsters claims: deceased was being harassed for demand of dowry and due to which she committed suicide Gopal VS State of Rajasthan - 2024 Supreme(Raj) 1170 - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 1170.
Active or Direct Act Requirement: ...there must be evidence of an active or direct act by the accused that led the deceased to commit suicide from related analyses, aligning with precedents like Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - AllahabadParimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati.
Not every video suffices. If the video is found to be fabricated or irrelevant, the court may refuse to direct an investigation Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997. Mere suspicion fails: Mere suspicion or the existence of a video does not automatically establish a case of abetment or incitement; it must be supported by other circumstances Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997.
Examples:- No mens rea finding: The trial Court... has not recorded any finding about mens rea on the part of appellant to instigate the deceased for committing suicide Gopal VS State of Rajasthan - 2024 Supreme(Raj) 1170 - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 1170.- No intent disclosure: It is a case in which there was no disclosure by the deceased that he would be committing suicide; neither by writing a suicide note nor by disclosing his intention Hiralal Ahirwar vs State Of Madhya Pradesh - 2024 Supreme(MP) 732 - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 732.- Hypersensitivity without active role may dismiss applications State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station- Mohan Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VS Bhagabai W/o. Ashwini Kumar Thakur - Chhattisgarh.
Legal Precedents: Courts have held that mere allegations or suspicion are insufficient; there must be clear evidence of active acts or direct instigation Ambesh Mani Tripathi VS State of U. P. - AllahabadRomit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - Allahabad.
Videos rarely stand alone. Courts examine:- Suicide notes: Before committing the suicide, the deceased is said to have written two suicide notes... My wife Khushboo and his parents... are threatening me MUNSHIRAM VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2018 3 Supreme 557 - 2018 3 Supreme 557.- Witness statements: Family accounts of torture, e.g., from October 2000 to 18th March 2001, the accused were... making illegal demands... and as those demands were not met, deceased was physically and mentally tortured. As that was unbearable, deceased committed suicide State Of Maharashtra VS Chandrakant Bhagwan Katkar - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 2190 - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2190State of Maharashtra VS Chandrakant Bhagwan Katkar - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 2513 - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2513.- Circumstances: Seizure of notes or recordings during investigation Dharmendra Kumar Singh @ Timal Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2018 Supreme(Jhk) 1615 - 2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1615.
In abetment probes, the scope of Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. includes the power of the Magistrate to order an investigation into circumstances suggesting possible abetment or incitement Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997.
When the deceased recorded a video or message prior to suicide blaming the accused, and evidence suggests active harassment or instigation, proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC are likely maintainable from case analyses Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - AllahabadParimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - Gauhati.
In summary, an application under Section 156(3) CrPC is typically maintainable when a deceased's pre-suicide video, combined with other evidence, creates a prima facie case of abetment or incitement. Videos blaming accused for harassment strengthen this, but courts demand more than suspicion—active acts are crucial Upender Shishodiya VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2004Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 997.
Key Takeaways:- Videos are powerful circumstantial evidence but need corroboration.- Magistrates focus on preliminary grounds, not guilt.- Exceptions apply for fabricated or standalone videos.
This analysis draws from documented precedents; outcomes vary by facts. Seek professional legal counsel for personalized guidance.
References:1. Upender Shishodiya VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 20042. Anand Giri alias Ashok Kumar Chotiya VS State of U. P. - 2022 0 Supreme(All) 9973. MULCHAND S/O NAMOMAL SETIYA vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS JARIPATKA NAGPUR - Bombay4. Sandeep Kumar @ Sunny vs State Of Punjab & Another - 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 2011 - 2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 20115. Gopal VS State of Rajasthan - 2024 Supreme(Raj) 1170 - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 11706. Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Yadav VS State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 313 - 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 3137. Kuldeep Nishad @ Deepu Nishad VS State of U. P. - AllahabadParimita Neog, D/o. Sri Arun Neog VS State Of Assam, rep. By The PP - GauhatiAmbesh Mani Tripathi VS State of U. P. - AllahabadRomit Soni VS State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. - AllahabadState of Chhattisgarh through Police Station- Mohan Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VS Bhagabai W/o. Ashwini Kumar Thakur - Chhattisgarh
#CrPC1563, #SuicideAbetment, #LegalIndia
Investigating officer has also not recorded the statement of parents of the deceased, who can very well be addressed the truth. It is a case under Section 306 IPC, therefore, the burden is upon the prosecution to prove it. ... It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased in....
After the petitioners had led their evidence and when the statement of the deceased was to be recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, he committed suicide. ... In the facts of the case, secondly and thirdly in Section 107, will have no application. Hence, the question is whether the appellants instigated the deceased to commit suicide#HL_....
had in fact induced her to end the life by committing suicide. ... Before committing suicide she wrote a suicide note and a letter to her husband in a diary on pages 11 and 12 thereof. Her dying-declaration was recorded on 16.6.1986 by, Parmeshwar Dayal, Tehsildar and Executive Magistrate. Sohan Lal Sharma is a resident of Raipur, Madhya Pradesh. ... The prosecution further alleged that ....
The trial Court in the judgment impugned has not recorded any finding about mens rea on the part of appellant to instigate the deceased for committing suicide. ... Coming to facts of the case in hand, PW.1, brother of deceased, deposed evidence that her sister (deceased) was being harassed for demand of dowry and due to which she committed su....
suicide, deceased has video-graphed a message in mobile blaming both brothers solely for his suicide. ... to commit suicide. ... has stated that due to persistent threat and blackmailing recorded message from his mobile blaming accused.
Further, when the deceased herself was hypersensitive about normal human conduct and committed suicide, in such situation, conduct of the deceased is also an important factor to analyze the evidence. ... cruelty meted out to the victim had in fact induced her to end her life by committing suicide. ... It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased t....
Along with the said application the petitioner placed on record the transcript of the video recorded by the deceased on his mobile phone on 29.11.2019. The transcript of the video recorded by the deceased is attached as Annexure P-14 to the petition. 9. ... After the petitioners had led their evidence and when the statement of the deceased was to be #H....
It is a case in which there was no disclosure by the deceased that he would be committing suicide; neither by writing a suicide note nor by disclosing his intention to any of the witnesses. ... In the present case, the death of the deceased cannot be said to be a suicide because there is no material available on record indicating in affirmative that he....
the life by committing suicide. ... or incidence whereby the Appellant herein is alleged to have committed any wilful act or omission or intentionally aided or instigated the deceased Pranab Kumar Nag in committing the act of suicide. ... The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 29.06.2016 as well as entire proceeding of #HL_STA....
It also requires an active act or direct act which led the deceased to commit suicide seeing no option and this act must have been intended to push the deceased into such a position that he/she committed suicide.” 12. The aforesaid judgment in M. ... By merely stating that the applicant was responsible for suicide of the deceased as he was unable to repay the money tak....
At this stage, there is no reason to disbelieve the suicide note and video made by the deceased just before his death. Though Mahant Narendra Giri has died because of hanging, but facts of the case reflect that he was hypersensitive man and considering his post and position in the society that he was President of “All India Akhada Parishad”, Mahant/Head of Shri Math “Baghambari Gaddi” and “Shri Bade/Lete Hanuman Ji Temple, Prayagraj” was very much depressed on account of the reason that if Ana....
As that was unbearable, deceased committed suicide, Therefore, the accused are also alleged to have abetted deceased in committing suicide. 6. Therefore, it is prosecution''s case that from October 2000 to 18th March 2001, the accused were, from time to time, making illegal demands of fridge, mixer, water heater, etc. and also Rs.10,000/- and as those demands were not met, deceased was physically and mentally tortured.
6. Therefore, it is prosecution's case that from October 2000 to 18th March 2001, the accused were, from time to time, making illegal demands of fridge, mixer, water heater, etc. and also Rs. 10,000/- and as those demands were not met, deceased was physically and mentally tortured. As that was unbearable, deceased committed suicide, Therefore, the accused are also alleged to have abetted deceased in committing suicide.
It is alleged that on 8.7.2013, due to continuous humiliation and suffering inflicted upon by the wife and the accused persons, the Appellant’s son (Brijesh Singh) committed suicide. Before committing the suicide, the deceased is said to have written two suicide notes which needs to be recorded herein. My wife Khushboo and his parents and family members since after marriage are threatening me and my family saying that we are dacoits and we will kill you and also have filed fa....
PW-11- Shiv Kumar Singh seized the suicide note from the room where the deceased committed suicide and it was the suicidal note of the deceased only. He did not record the statement of any of the accused persons and after completion of his investigation; he submitted the charge-sheet against the accused persons. In his suicidal note, it was also mentioned that the appellant Sangita Singh is his elder sister-in-law (Bhabhi) and she should not be given any trouble. In his cross-examina....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
