Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Multiple Ways to Close a FIR - FIR can be closed through various legal mechanisms, including quashing by courts, withdrawal, compromise, or settlement between parties. The specific method depends on the nature of the offence, whether cognizable or non-cognizable, and the circumstances of the case Dharampreet Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Gurdev Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana.
Quashing of FIR - Courts can quash FIRs under Section 482 CrPC when proceedings are based on compromise, lack of prima facie evidence, or if the offence is non-cognizable or does not disclose a criminal offence. The Supreme Court has outlined categories where FIRs can be quashed, such as cases involving settlement or where no cognizable offence is disclosed Dharampreet Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Kamleshbhai Vasudevbhai Rajput VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
Settlement and Compromise - FIRs related to non-compoundable offences can sometimes be closed if parties settle their disputes, as the law permits the prosecution to be discontinued upon mutual consent. This is particularly applicable in cases where the offence is non-cognizable or minor Gurdev Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Dharampreet Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana.
Investigation Closure - Police can close investigations if they find no prima facie case, or if the allegations do not disclose a cognizable offence. The police must follow proper procedures, including obtaining necessary permissions for non-cognizable cases Dikshit Chauhan vs State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh, ANJU BALA vs U T OF J AND K TH S H O POLICE STATION SATWARI JAMMU - Jammu and Kashmir.
Limitations and Conditions - FIR closure methods are subject to legal conditions, such as the nature of the offence, the presence of genuine compromise, and whether the offence is cognizable or non-cognizable. Courts exercise discretion based on facts, and the law emphasizes justice and expediency Himanshu Nanawati S/o Shri Dharmendra Nanawati VS State Of Rajasthan, Through PP - Rajasthan, Kamleshbhai Vasudevbhai Rajput VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
Analysis and Conclusion:FIRs can be closed through multiple legal avenues, primarily via court orders (quashing), withdrawal by complainants, or settlement between parties. The most common and legally recognized methods include quashing under Section 482 CrPC in cases of lack of merit or settlement, and closure upon mutual agreement in non-cognizable or minor offences. The process ensures that justice is balanced with procedural efficiency, preventing unnecessary harassment or prolonged litigation.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information on legal processes in India and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for advice specific to your situation.
Facing a First Information Report (FIR) can be stressful, especially if you believe the allegations are unfounded or mistaken. A common question arises: How many ways can a FIR be closed by police? Understanding the legal mechanisms for closing a FIR is crucial for accused persons, complainants, and anyone navigating India's criminal justice system. This post breaks down the primary methods, drawing from key legal provisions under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and judicial precedents. We'll explore police-led closures, court interventions, and additional avenues like compromises, ensuring you grasp the processes typically involved.
A FIR is the first written document prepared by police upon receiving information about a cognizable offence, mandatory under Section 154 CrPC when such an offence is disclosed. Lalita Kumari VS Govt. of U. P. - 2013 8 Supreme 1 Police are required to register it and investigate promptly. However, not every FIR leads to trial—closures prevent abuse of process, save resources, and uphold justice. Closures can occur through investigation outcomes, preliminary findings, or judicial orders, but they must follow strict legal guidelines to avoid misuse.
Police have several avenues to close a FIR, primarily through investigation or preliminary assessment. Here are the key methods:
Once a FIR is registered for a cognizable offence, police must investigate and submit a final report under Section 173 CrPC. Jayant Vitamins LTD. VS Chaitanyakumar - 1992 0 Supreme(SC) 495 This could be a charge sheet if evidence supports prosecution, or a closure report if no offence is found, lack of evidence exists, or the case is false. For instance, if investigation reveals no offence has been committed or the case is false, police submit a final report indicating closure, often as a 'mistake of fact' or lack of evidence. K. Chandramohan, Chennai VS Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 1985
Police can close a FIR directly if initial inquiries show the facts do not support the allegations. Originally, FIR filed by the police as closed as Mistake of Fact. Renuka Bhojani VS T. Narendran Power of Attorney holder of Thiru R. Kumaravelu - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 433 - 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 433 This applies when the FIR is based on incorrect information or does not amount to a cognizable offence. K. Chandramohan, Chennai VS Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 1985 Courts often accept such closures if backed by evidence. K. Chandramohan, Chennai VS Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 1985
Example: Business disputes mistaken for cheating may be closed if facts reveal no criminal intent.
Before formal registration or early in the process, police may conduct a preliminary inquiry if ambiguity exists about a cognizable offence. If no offence is disclosed, the case can be closed without full investigation. Jose Hormese vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4509 The police can close cases at the preliminary inquiry stage if no offence is found or if the facts do not support further investigation. T. T. Antony VS State Of Kerala - 2001 5 Supreme 131
Additionally, police may file a closure report post-preliminary findings if insufficient grounds exist. Jose Hormese vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police - 2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 4509
Post-investigation, if no prima facie case exists, police file a closure or 'undetected' report. Thereafter, the police closed the said FIR by way of filing final report on the ground ‘undetected’. P. Lalitha VS M. A. Bari - 2020 Supreme(Telangana) 9 - 2020 0 Supreme(Telangana) 9 This is communicated to the complainant, who can seek remedies. Jagubar Sadique VS Superintendent of Police, Thanjvaur District, Thanjavur - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 3805
While police handle initial closures, courts play a pivotal role under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIRs preventing abuse of process.
Courts quash FIRs if based on manipulations, falsehoods, or frivolous allegations. Sunkara Srinivasulu VS Station House Officer - 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1257 For example, manipulation in FIRs justified quashing the FIR. Sunkara Srinivasulu VS Station House Officer - 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1257 Or if the FIR discloses no cognizable offence or is based on vague, reckless, or false allegations. A. Mohamed Saleem VS District Superintendent of Police, District Thanjavur - 2016 0 Supreme(Mad) 1250
From additional judicial insights, FIRs can be quashed on compromise between parties, especially for non-heinous offences. By way of present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.125 dated 26.9.2018... on the basis of compromise dated 11.1.2019. Vikas Malhotra VS State of Punjab - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 411 - 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 411 Courts permit this under Section 482 if it serves justice, particularly for compoundable or minor offences. Multiple sources affirm: FIR can be closed through various legal mechanisms, including quashing by courts, withdrawal, compromise, or settlement. (Derived from Dharampreet Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana, Gurdev Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana)
Courts exercise quashing power cautiously. Sunkara Srinivasulu VS Station House Officer - 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1257
Here's a summary of methods:1. Final report under Section 173 CrPC. Jayant Vitamins LTD. VS Chaitanyakumar - 1992 0 Supreme(SC) 4952. Closure as mistake of fact. K. Chandramohan, Chennai VS Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Chennai - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 19853. Preliminary inquiry closure. T. T. Antony VS State Of Kerala - 2001 5 Supreme 1314. Closure report with complainant notice. Jagubar Sadique VS Superintendent of Police, Thanjvaur District, Thanjavur - 2014 0 Supreme(Mad) 38055. Court quashing (including on compromise). Sunkara Srinivasulu VS Station House Officer - 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1257, Vikas Malhotra VS State of Punjab - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 411 - 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 411
Recommendations:- Police: Investigate thoroughly before closure.- Accused: Seek legal help for quashing petitions.- Complainants: Challenge unjust closures in court.
In conclusion, while police can close FIRs through investigation, mistake of fact, or preliminary stages, courts ensure oversight via quashing, especially on settlements. These mechanisms balance efficiency and fairness, but outcomes depend on facts. Stay informed, act promptly, and consult experts.
(Oral) - By way of present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.125 dated 26.9.2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Phase 11, Mohali, on the basis of compromise dated 11.1.2019 (Annexure P-2). ... FIR No. 40/2020, U/s 52A Prison Act IPC, PS Tarpadi, Patiala. Q5 . How many victims/complainants are there in th....
Desai submits that the dispute was resolved and on the very same day, the applicant had given a complaint to the police officer who had come on the spot. Countering the allegations made in the FIR, Mr. Desai submits that the facts in the FIR do not suggest any illegal act or any criminality. ... F.I.R. do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under Section 156(1....
He would further submit that in order to bring work in their favour, they are passing threats upon the officers of the R.T.O. either by way of filing the complaint under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act or by way of taking recourse under RTI and many a time, they come in the office and ... Therefore, when the investigation by the police is in progress, the court should not go into the merits of the allegation....
By way of filing these two miscellaneous petitions, the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court for exercising extraordinary jurisdiction so as to quash FIR No. 33/2024 for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 120-B, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and FIR No.34/2024 lodged at Banswara Police Station ... Abhijeet Singh, S.P. came to the Kotwali Police Station and they beat the complainant with belts i....
It is the grievance of the petitioner that the police concerned has illegally and unjustifiably closed the investigation in case FIR No. 216/2011 as not admitted. 6. ... Station, i.e., Police Station, Satwari, Jammu and lodged a false and frivolous complaint against them which led to the registration of the FIR No. 215 of 2011; that they also approached the concerned Police Station Sr. .....
The police authority did not treat the said written complaint as an FIR. 2. ... Police officials neither lodged an FIR nor caused investigation of the case. She is still in dark. ... Administrative action is being taken in this matter and the concerned police officers, namely, SI Tarun Chakraborty, the arresting officer of the deceased and LC/704 Ratna Adhikary (Sentry duty at the time of the incident) we....
Many times, the parents, including the close relatives of the wife, make a mountain out of a molehill. ... The police registered the F.I.R. and conducted the investigation. The police found, after the investigation, that the informant’s mother-in-law, Brijbala, started harassing her after three days of the marriage. The other petitioners also used to taunt her because she was not equal to them. ... (2) Where the allegati....
Given the legislative mandate, the prosecution can be closed by quashing the FIR and consequent proceedings. 6. ... All pending application(s), if any, stand closed. Petition allowed in the terms mentioned above. Police ... The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all conseq....
All pending application(s), if any, stand closed. ... However, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the prosecution qua the non-compoundable offences can be closed by quashing the FIR and consequent proceedings. ... As per the compromise both the parties have settled their disputes Now, in case FIR No.120 dated 25.06.2020, Police Station Mohakampura, Amritsar would be cancelled, I shall ....
The Station House Officer, Ramabhadrapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District shall return the tobacco products seized in connection with the F.I.R. in question to the petitioner. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed. ... that is furnished to the police discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then only police are required to register an F.I.R. under Section....
6. Originally, FIR filed by the police as closed as Mistake of Fact. As indicated, the crux of the allegation is that there was a business dealing more than 20 years and the accused job is copper profiling and supply it and the defacto complainant entrusted the copper for profiling to the accused.
Thereafter, the police closed the said FIR by way of filing final report on the ground ‘undetected’. In the said complaint, number of the vehicle was not mentioned. PW.2, who claimed to be the passenger of the accident lorry, colleague of the father of the deceased and residing in the same colony, kept quiet for almost one year. The police reopened the case only when the driver of the lorry surrendered himself before the police after one year and voluntarily confessed to have....
One of us (the Chief Justice) has been observing since last 5 months that the practice in the State of Chhattisgarh is not to lodge the FIR at the first instance. One system being followed is to lodge merg intimation (intimation of death) and thereafter the FIR is lodged. Another system is to lodge Dehati Nalishi (unnumbered report). There are various ways how the police avoids lodging of the FIR.
There are various ways how the police avoids lodging of the FIR. One system being followed is to lodge merg intimation (intimation of death) and thereafter the FIR is lodged. 7. One of us (the Chief Justice) has been observing since last 5 months that the practice in the State of Chhattisgarh is not to lodge the FIR at the first instance. Another system is to lodge Dehati Nalishi (unnumbered report).
Hence, it would not be within the domain of the police to register a case against the offender for an offence alleged under Section 188 of the IPC and investigate the same, as registration of an FIR for an offence under Section 188 IPC, is not permitted by the Cr. P.C. The legislative intention appears to be clear from the language of Section 195(1) of the Cr. P.C. which clearly prescribes that where an offence is committed under Section 188 IPC, it would be obligatory that the public servant ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
