Judicial Appointments and Governance
Subject : International Law - Intellectual Property Law
GENEVA/NEW DELHI – In a significant development for India's standing in global legal circles, Justice Prathiba M. Singh of the Delhi High Court has been appointed as the Chair of the World Intellectual Property Organization’s (WIPO) prestigious Advisory Board of Judges. Her term, running from 2025 to 2027, marks the first time an Indian jurist has been selected to lead this influential body, signalling a robust acknowledgment of India’s growing expertise and leadership in the complex and rapidly evolving field of intellectual property (IP) law.
The appointment was hailed as a “proud moment for India” by the country's Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva. In a statement, the mission highlighted her new role, noting, “As chair, she leads a group of international judges, providing guidance and direction to WIPO’s work with judiciaries in the field of #IP.”
WIPO, a specialized agency of the United Nations, expressed that it was “honoured” to welcome Justice Singh to lead the ten-member board. This body is instrumental in shaping WIPO’s engagement with national and regional judiciaries, fostering transnational dialogue, and developing best practices for IP adjudication worldwide.
Justice Singh's appointment is the culmination of a distinguished three-decade career dedicated to intellectual property law. Beginning her practice in 1991, she became a leading IP litigator, arguing seminal cases before the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, and various IP tribunals. Her expertise was formally recognized in 2013 when she became the first IP practitioner to be designated a Senior Advocate by the Delhi High Court.
Her elevation to the bench as a permanent judge of the Delhi High Court in 2017 brought her practitioner's insight to the judiciary. She quickly became a driving force behind significant institutional reforms, most notably spearheading the creation of the court's first dedicated Intellectual Property Division (IPD). As the inaugural Chairperson and Presiding Judge of the IPD in 2021-22, she was instrumental in drafting its foundational procedural frameworks, including the Delhi High Court IP Rights Division Rules and the Patent Suits Rules, 2022. These reforms have been widely praised for streamlining and specializing IP litigation in India, making the Delhi High Court a premier forum for complex IP disputes.
Her judicial philosophy, reflected in numerous notable judgments on patent enforcement, copyright protection, and trademark disputes, is often cited for its nuanced balancing of innovation incentives with the public interest—a critical consideration in areas like pharmaceutical patents and access to digital content.
As Chair of the WIPO Advisory Board of Judges, Justice Singh will lead a diverse group of jurists from Panama, China, Kazakhstan, Egypt, France, Canada, Tanzania, the European Union (Luxembourg), and South Korea. The board operates under the WIPO Judicial Institute, a global center for judicial training and cooperation. Its primary function is to provide high-level strategic guidance to WIPO, ensuring its programs and resources effectively address the needs of judges across varied legal systems.
Her leadership tenure is expected to focus on several key areas critical to the future of IP. The source materials indicate a forward-looking agenda that includes: * Promoting Digital and AI Jurisprudence: Guiding discussions on emerging challenges posed by artificial intelligence, data rights, and the proliferation of AI-generated works. * Enhancing Judicial Collaboration: Encouraging cross-border judicial training and the exchange of case law to foster a shared understanding of international IP norms. * Supporting Women in IP: Championing initiatives to support women in the IP legal and judicial fields. * Expanding Global Legal Resources: Overseeing the expansion of the WIPO Lex-Judgements Database, with a focus on including more decisions from developing countries to create a more representative global repository of IP case law.
Her concurrent role as Co-Chair of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Working Group on Regulatory Considerations for AI in Health further underscores her deep engagement with the legal and ethical dimensions of new technologies. This dual expertise positions her uniquely to guide the WIPO board in navigating the intricate intersection of IP, health, and artificial intelligence.
Justice Singh's appointment is more than a personal accolade; it is a powerful statement about the maturation of India's IP ecosystem. For decades, India has been a crucial voice in global IP debates, often advocating for a development-oriented perspective. This appointment places an Indian jurist at the helm of a body that shapes how those debates are translated into judicial practice globally. It reflects international recognition of the sophistication and thought leadership emerging from the Indian judiciary, particularly the Delhi High Court, in handling complex IP matters.
For the international legal community, her leadership promises a perspective that is deeply rooted in the realities of both developed and developing economies. Her experience in a jurisdiction that grapples with issues of access to medicines, protection for traditional knowledge, and the challenges of a burgeoning digital economy will bring invaluable insights to the board.
Her leadership is likely to reinforce the exchange of jurisprudential ideas, strengthening collaboration among judicial systems and enhancing the capacity of courts worldwide to adapt to the rapidly changing technological landscape. As WIPO noted, the new board will “strengthen dialogue among judges worldwide and serve as a platform to share judicial experiences on emerging trends and best practices in IP adjudication.” Under Justice Singh's stewardship, that dialogue is set to become more inclusive, forward-thinking, and globally relevant than ever before.
#IntellectualProperty #WIPO #GlobalLaw
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.