Back
Kerala HC: No Need for Exact Grams in Arrest Notice If 'Commercial Quantity' Is Flagged in NDPS Busts
In a procedural win for police in drug cases, the dismissed a bail plea from an MDMA possessor, ruling that labeling seized contraband as a "commercial quantity" in arrest grounds notices fully satisfies constitutional and statutory mandates—even without pinpointing the exact weight. Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath delivered the verdict in Arun Kumar P. v. State of Kerala (B.A. No. 1388 of 2026), underscoring practical compliance over rigid formalities.
From Bakery Road Bust to Bail Battle
On , at 8:44 a.m., Arun Kumar P., a 28-year-old from Kozhikode, was nabbed near Kovoor Cochin Bakery with 194.99 grams of MDMA—a commercial quantity under the . Police at Medical College station registered Crime No. 27/2026 under , alleging possession of the psychotropic substance. Arun has remained in judicial custody since his arrest.
The flashpoint? Arun's bail application under , hinged on an alleged procedural flaw: the arrest notices under informed him and a relative of the grounds but omitted the precise 194.99-gram figure, only noting a "commercial quantity."
Petitioner's Pitch: Arrest Illegal, Bail Imperative
Arun's counsel, led by
, leaned hard on constitutional safeguards. They invoked
, mandating that arrestees be informed
"as soon as may be"
of arrest grounds, and
, requiring
"full particulars of the offence or other grounds."
Citing Kerala precedents like
Yazin S. v. State of Kerala
(2025 KHC OnLine 2383), they argued that NDPS cases demand specifying seizure quantity for "effective communication," especially to flag bailable vs. non-bailable offenses. Without the exact grams, they claimed, the arrest violated
's right to life and liberty, warranting immediate release.
The team submitted case diary extracts, including the FIR, arrest memo, and notices (Annexures 1-4), to spotlight the omission.
Prosecution's Counter: Formalities Followed to the Letter
Senior Public Prosecutor pushed back, insisting procedures were meticulously observed. She highlighted evidence linking Arun to intentional trafficking and dismissed the quantity quibble, arguing the notices explicitly tied the arrest to commercial-quantity MDMA possession. No shortcuts, they said—just solid compliance amid serious NDPS allegations.
Bench Breaks Down the Blueprint: Precedents Pave the Way
Justice Edappagath dove into lore, noting the issue isn't . In Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India (2024) 7 SCC 576 and Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2024) 8 SCC 254, the apex court deemed written grounds mandatory under Article 22(1) and —non-compliance vitiates arrests. Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana (2025 SCC OnLine SC 269) clarified no written mandate exists, but communication is non-negotiable.
A three-judge bench in Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra (2025 SCC OnLine SC 2356) sealed it: grounds must be furnished in writing, in a language the arrestee understands , without exception. For NDPS, Kerala singles like Rayees R.M. v. State of Kerala (2025 KHC 2086) and Vishnu N.P. v. State of Kerala (2025 KHC OnLine 1262) stressed quantity disclosure.
Yet, scrutinizing the diary, the court found the notices clear: "
what was seized was a commercial quantity
.
"The object? Enable the accused to gauge offense gravity—bailable or not, small/intermediate/commercial."
Therefore, if the grounds for arrest state that the quantity seized is an intermediate or commercial quantity, that suffices to comply with Sections 47 and 48 of BNSS, even if the exact quantity is not specified.
"
This aligns with emphasizing substantial compliance serves justice without nitpicking.
Key Observations
"The requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory statutory and constitutional requirement."
"Noncompliance withwill be a violation of the fundamental right of the accused guaranteed by the said Article."
"The object of mentioning the quantity is to enable the accused to identify whether the offence is bailable or non-bailable, and whether the quantity involved is small, intermediate, or commercial."
Bail Bid Bounced: Roadmap for NDPS Enforcement
Dismissing the application on : " Thus, there has been proper communication of the grounds of arrest to the applicant and his relative. The bail application is, therefore, dismissed. "
materials stick Arun to the crime, and this ruling streamlines NDPS arrests: police needn't tally grams in notices if category is called out. It shields procedural robustness while upholding rights, potentially easing bail hurdles in drug hauls and guiding lower courts nationwide.
