Back
Doctor's Guilty Plea in Cheque Bounce Case Stands: Kerala HC Slams Bid to Evade Rs 6 Lakh Payout
In a sharp rebuke to post-conviction regrets, the dismissed a petition by a Kozhikode-based doctor and motivational speaker seeking to quash his conviction in a case. Justice C.S. Dias ruled that Yahya Khan N, who voluntarily pleaded guilty before a Lakshadweep magistrate, cannot now challenge the judgment just to dodge compensation—especially after undergoing a nominal jail term.
The decision, delivered on , in Crl. M.C. No. 10511 of 2025 , underscores the finality of in under the .
From Lakshadweep Complaint to Kozhikode Courtroom Drama
The saga began with Sainaba T.P., a resident of Agatti Island in Lakshadweep, filing a complaint under against Yahya Khan. Her case alleged , leading to S.T. No. 16 of 2024 before the .
On , during a camp sitting in Kozhikode, Yahya appeared, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the court plus Rs 6 lakh compensation to Sainaba, with three months' jail in default. He got nine months to pay but failed, prompting a by .
Nearly a year later, on , Yahya filed to quash the conviction under , claiming procedural lapses and ignorance of consequences.
"Counsel Absent, I Was Clueless": Petitioner's Defense Unravels
Yahya argued his lawyer skipped the hearing, leaving him to plead guilty without grasping risks. He invoked and a precedent in Raseen Babu K.M. v. State of Kerala (2021), alleging the magistrate skipped reading offence particulars and failed summary trial norms under .
Sainaba countered fiercely: Yahya arrived with counsel; offence details were explained; he knowingly pleaded guilty, seeking leniency and time to pay. As a doctor and Guinness record holder (per his Instagram), he couldn't feign ignorance. She urged dismissal, noting appeal as the proper remedy.
The magistrate's detailed report backed her: Plea recorded after explanation, signed deposition, consensual nine-month extension granted, and substantive sentence served without protest.
Court's Razor-Sharp Scrutiny: Procedure Perfect, Motive Transparent
Justice Dias dissected the record, affirming compliance with
for
in NI Act cases (per
).
"
were read over to the petitioner, who pleaded guilty, his plea was recorded,"
the court noted, dismissing claims of ignorance.
The
Raseen Babu
reliance fell flat—it's for warrant cases, not summons-summary. Yahya's 11-month silence post-conviction, broken only by enforcement, screamed evasion.
"The petitioner’s sole intention is to avoid paying compensation to the 1st respondent, and nothing more and nothing less."
Echoing media reports on the verdict, the ruling reinforces that educated accused can't rewind voluntary pleas in cheque cases.
Key Observations
"There is not an iota of doubt that the were read over to the petitioner, who pleaded guilty, his plea was recorded, and the deposition was signed by the petitioner."
"The petitioner, who is a doctor and a Guinness World Record Winner, cannot be labelled as an ignorant person who was unaware of his act of pleading guilty."
"On a comprehensive evaluation... I am not convinced that there is any illegality or irrationality in the warranting interference by this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS."
No U-Turn Allowed: Dismissal with a Warning for Future Debtors
"The Crl.M.C. is meritless and only deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed."
This leaves Yahya facing enforcement of the Rs 6 lakh payout. For cheque bounce litigants, it's a clear signal: stick in summary proceedings if procedures hold. No quashing under BNSS Section 528 merely to skirt liability—appeal if aggrieved. A timely caution amid rising NI Act filings, prioritizing complainant relief.
