Justice Dharmadikari Bids Empathetic Farewell to Kerala High Court

In a poignant farewell reference on March 5 at the Kerala High Court , Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadikari reflected on his transformative tenure as he prepares to take oath as Chief Justice of the Madras High Court . Emphasizing that "justice is delivered not only swiftly but with empathy," the outgoing judge underscored his unwavering commitment to preserving public faith in the judiciary. Chief Justice Soumen Sen lauded his colleague's impactful contributions, marking the end of a brief but substantive chapter in Kerala's judicial landscape.

This transition highlights the dynamic nature of judicial appointments in India, where inter-high court transfers under Article 222 of the Constitution foster diversity and fresh perspectives across regional benches.

Justice Dharmadikari's Distinguished Career Trajectory

Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadikari's journey to the apex of Southern high court leadership is a testament to perseverance and legal excellence. A graduate in both commerce and law from Nagpur University, he enrolled as an advocate in the Madhya Pradesh High Court . His early career included a 15-year stint as Standing Counsel for the Union of India from 2000 to 2015 , where he honed skills in constitutional and administrative litigation.

Elevated as an Additional Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on April 7, 2016 , he was confirmed as a permanent judge on March 17, 2018 . In a significant transfer in April 2025 , he joined the Kerala High Court , taking oath on April 23, 2025 . This move, though brief—spanning less than a year—proved pivotal in bridging his Central Indian roots with Southern judicial ethos.

Notably, Additional Advocate General Ashok M. Cherian recalled Dharmadikari's meticulous advocacy for the Welfare Commissioner in the Bhopal Gas Tragedy cases. "His work exemplified balancing legal technicalities with the larger cause of social justice ," Cherian noted, evoking the enduring legacy of that tragedy and the judiciary's role in victim redressal under tort and environmental law principles.

Farewell Ceremony Highlights: Reflections on Cultural Transition

The Kerala High Court amphitheater buzzed with camaraderie as judges, advocates, and staff gathered to honor Justice Dharmadikari. In his address, he vividly contrasted the "traditional legal atmosphere" of Jabalpur's Madhya Pradesh High Court —rooted in the Hindi-speaking Mahakoushal region—with Kerala's Malayalam-dominated, rights-vigilant ecosystem.

“The legal environment in Kerala is distinct. It boasts an exceptionally active and vocal Bar association and citizenry that is both highly educated and acutely rights conscious. Coming from the more traditional legal atmosphere in Madhya Pradesh, I had to swiftly adapt to a culture where every administrative decision is scrutinized by vigilant civil society. This level of engagement, while demanding, reflects the robust democratic spirit of the State,” he remarked.

He candidly admitted initial challenges in grasping local contexts, crediting "the guidance of my brother judges" for navigation. Justice Dharmadikari profusely thanked the Kerala Bar for their "erudition and professional ethics," describing their arguments as "masterclasses in precision." He extended gratitude to fellow judges, the registry, and court staff, portraying his Kerala stint as a "vital bridge" to South Indian legal nuances.

Tributes from Colleagues and the Bar

Chief Justice Soumen Sen delivered a glowing encomium, characterizing Dharmadikari's tenure as "substantial and impactful." He highlighted the judge's versatility across Single and Division Benches, handling a "wide spectrum of cases" with judgments showcasing "deep understanding of law and clarity of reasoning."

“Decision making as a Judge is a demanding responsibility with both authority and restraint in the Constitutional framework. Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadikari has always remained acutely conscious of this delicate balance as is reflected from various Judgments,” Justice Sen added. He portrayed Dharmadikari as embodying "calm demeanour, cordial nature, and clarity of expression," qualities endearing him to peers and practitioners alike.

Peeyus A Kottam , President of the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association (KHCAA), echoed this sentiment: Despite the "short period," Dharmadikari had "earned the confidence and respect of the Bar through his fairness and legal acumen." These tributes underscore the symbiotic judge-Bar relationship essential for efficient justice delivery, particularly in high-PIL jurisdictions like Kerala.

Vision for Madras High Court Leadership

Gazing toward Chennai, Justice Dharmadikari acknowledged the Madras High Court 's "historic legacy" as one of India's oldest chartered high courts, established in 1862 . “My goal remains unchanged, to ensure that the common man's faith in the judiciary remains unshaken and that justice is delivered not only swiftly but with empathy,” he affirmed.

This ethos aligns with mounting calls for humane jurisprudence amid India's judicial backlog—over 50 million pending cases nationwide. As CJ, he could prioritize case management reforms, alternative dispute resolution, and empathetic disposal in sensitive matters like family and constitutional petitions.

Legal Analysis: Empathy, Restraint, and Judicial Adaptation

Justice Dharmadikari's farewell speech elevates "empathy" from a soft skill to a judicial imperative. In constitutional terms, it resonates with Article 21 's guarantee of speedy justice and the Supreme Court's gloss on "justice with humanity" in precedents like Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar ( 1979 ), which birthed legal aid mandates. His emphasis on swiftness addresses chronic delays, potentially influencing Madras HC's approach to writ jurisdiction .

The discourse on judicial restraint —balancing "authority and restraint"—mirrors Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud's recent observations on judicial overreach . Dharmadikari's Madhya Pradesh-to-Kerala transition exemplifies Article 222's utility: exposing judges to diverse socio-linguistic milieus mitigates regional biases, enriching federal judicial fabric.

Kerala's "rights-conscious citizenry" and "active Bar" exemplify robust public interest litigation , contrasting slower-paced Northern benches. This scrutiny fosters accountability but demands judicial agility, a lesson for incoming Southern leaders.

His Bhopal advocacy links to social justice , invoking MC Mehta v. Union of India principles on absolute liability , reminding practitioners of pro-victim stances in mass torts.

Broader Implications for Legal Practice and the Justice System

Dharmadikari's ascension signals a empathy-centric shift at Madras HC, India's second-largest by caseload (over 6 lakh pendings). Lawyers may anticipate accelerated hearings, Bar-friendly reforms, and emphasis on oral arguments—hallmarks of his Kerala praise.

For the Bar, it reinforces professional ethics' premium; Kerala's model could inspire nationwide advocacy elevations. Inter-state transfers, critiqued for disrupting families, gain validation here as acclimatization bridges.

Nationally, amid collegium debates and NJAC ghosts, such farewells reaffirm judge-centric selections prioritizing temperament over ideology. Public trust—Dharmadikari's lodestar—hinges on perceived empathy, vital post-COVID virtual hearing transitions and AI-judiciary experiments.

Conclusion

Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadikari departs Kerala not as a transient judge, but a bridge-builder whose tenure amplified democratic judicial dialogue. As Madras HC's new helm, his empathy-driven vision promises renewed vigor in justice administration. For legal professionals, his story is a clarion: Adapt, empathize, deliver—lest public faith wanes. The Indian judiciary, ever resilient, marches on.