Sabarimala Gold Heist: Kerala HC Accelerates Probe with Cutting-Edge Science and Firm Deadlines

In a pivotal hearing on February 19, 2026 , the Kerala High Court at Ernakulam , led by Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V and K.V. Jayakumar, took decisive steps in the suo motu proceedings (WP(C) No. 40608 of 2025) into the alleged plundering of gold from the gold-clad Dwarapalakas flanking the Sreekovil at Sabarimala Temple. The division bench emphasized scientific rigor as the bedrock of the prosecution, directing advanced metallurgical tests and granting key investigative permissions while eyeing a March 31 final report.

Shadows Over the Sacred Guardians: Unraveling the Theft

The case stems from shocking allegations of theft and misappropriation of gold from the iconic Dwarapalaka idols at Sabarimala, one of India's most revered pilgrimage sites. Triggered by a suo motu petition following SSCR 23/2025, the High Court has been monitoring the probe into Crime Nos. 3700 and 3701 of 2025 . Reports indicate a brazen heist targeting the temple's precious artifacts, with separate inquiries now probing irregularities linked to the temple flag mast. As news outlets like those covering the hearing noted, over two years have passed since the incident, heightening urgency for concrete evidence.

The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) , State of Kerala , and police officials are key respondents, with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) under scrutiny. No formal arguments from petitioners or respondents dominated this procedural update; instead, the focus was on investigative progress reported by IPS officer Sri. S. Sasidharan, who appeared in person.

Probe Powers Up: From Samples to Spectra

Building on its February 9 order, the court underscored that "an advanced forensic and metallurgical examination is absolutely essential and that the results thereof would constitute the foundation upon which the prosecution must rest its case to establish the allegations in a clear, cogent, and legally sustainable manner ."

The SIT informed the bench that 36 gold samples—30 from Crime No. 3700/2025 and 6 from 3701/2025—have been handed to the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge (Vigilance), Kollam , for dispatch to the National Metallurgical Laboratory (NML), Jamshedpur . Remarkably, NML agreed to conduct free tests using X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF) for surface composition, Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) for trace impurities, and Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) for alloy uniformity. The lab promised swift results.

Additionally, facing data retention challenges post-two years, the court permitted the SIT to seek call data records (CDRs) from Vodafone Idea, Jio, BSNL, and Airtel. Service providers must comply if data exists. Pending DVR analysis and prior CDRs were flagged, with the final report targeted for jurisdictional courts by March 31, 2026 .

A parallel development: The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) appointed DySP Hari C.S. for a 30-day preliminary inquiry into flag mast gold irregularities, per VACB Order E1-2974/2026 dated February 10 .

Court's Blueprint for Justice: No Room for Delay

No precedents were cited, but the bench's reasoning hinged on evidentiary imperatives in theft cases—scientific proof over mere suspicion. The order clarifies that metallurgical profiling will be " the very basis and fulcrum of the prosecution case ," distinguishing superficial claims from forensically validated ones.

Key Observations

"advanced forensic and metallurgical examination is absolutely essential and that the results thereof would constitute the foundation upon which the prosecution must rest its case "

"the National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, has expressed its willingness to conduct tests on the control and questioned samples by the specified methods... free of cost"

"the findings from the National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur, would constitute the very basis and fulcrum of the prosecution case "

"the final report can be laid before the jurisdictional court on or before 31.03.2026 "

Path to Accountability: Implications for Temple Trusts and Probes

The court's directives—expedited tests, CDR access, and deadlines—signal zero tolerance for investigative lapses in high-profile sacrilege cases. Posting the matter to March 26, 2026 , ensures momentum. For devotees and legal watchers, this reinforces judicial oversight in public trust matters, potentially setting a model for forensic-driven temple asset probes. Successful metallurgical matches could unlock prosecutions; delays, further scrutiny.

As the SIT races against time, Sabarimala's faithful await closure on the desecration of their sacred sentinels.