Back
'Wholly Unacceptable': Kerala HC Tears into Devaswom Board Over Filthy Temple Despite Crore Revenues
In a stinging rebuke, the has pulled up the for failing to maintain basic hygiene at the bustling Chottanikkara Bhagavathi Temple, a major pilgrimage site drawing hordes of devotees daily. A Division Bench of Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V and Justice K.V. Jayakumar , in an interim order dated , in (DBP No. 52/2025), labeled the ongoing sanitation crisis "wholly unacceptable" given the temple's staggering monthly income of ₹2-4 crores. The court mandated the appointment of a nodal officer and a dedicated team to enforce a comprehensive cleanliness plan urgently.
From Complaint to Courtroom: A Temple Mired in Mismanagement
The saga began with a complaint dated , from Sri. Thampy Thilakan alleging rampant maladministration, corruption, staff misconduct, financial irregularities, and abysmal amenities at Chottanikkara Temple—issues that spiraled into a suo motu . Respondents include the , , its commissioner, temple officials, the advisory committee, local panchayat, and others like and planning authorities, impleaded progressively.
Over multiple hearings since , the court spotlighted shocking lapses in public health and safety. Photographs submitted by complainant's counsel on the latest date revealed grimy water dispensers and squalid premises, underscoring defiance of prior directives. The temple, despite employing an engineer and over 20 staff onsite, generates vast revenues—doubled during festivals—yet remains a hygiene hazard.
Board's Apathy Meets Judicial Fury: The Clash in Court
The Devaswom Board's responses painted a picture of foot-dragging. Their commissioner reported plans to implement 's tripartite audit—covering solid/liquid waste and IEC strategies—via the Maramath Wing, citing a Thumboormuzhy Project estimate and failed tenders. However, the court dismissed these as "casual and perfunctory," noting vague specifications, absent detailed project reports, and an absurd three-month timeline for mere estimates. No urgency, despite repeated orders.
The complainant highlighted persistent filth through visuals, while the court invoked prior mandates, including a directive for Suchitwa's audit and a order for a detailed implementation roadmap. Reports from were deemed robust, yet the Board's actions fell "far short."
Dissecting the Rot: Court's Razor-Sharp Reasoning
No precedents were cited, but the bench applied principles of administrative accountability and public welfare under . It emphasized of devaswom boards managing public endowments, where substantial revenues demand exemplary standards. Distinguishing revenue generation from service delivery, the court faulted procedural laxity—like tendering without technical blueprints—as barriers to execution, signaling deeper maladministration.
The Suchitwa report's structure provided a blueprint: Part I for solid waste upgrades, Part II for liquid waste, and Part III for awareness campaigns. The bench stressed "" adherence, tying neglect to risks for devotees' health and safety.
Key Observations: The Court's Blunt Words
"Given such substantial revenue, the continued neglect of basic sanitation and hygiene is wholly unacceptable."
"The images are deeply disturbing and present a most unsatisfactory state of affairs. They indicate that, despite repeated judicial directions, effective measures have not been taken by the responsible officers to ensure cleanliness."
"Projects of this nature demand detailed implementation plans and properly prepared project reports prior to tendering."
These excerpts, drawn from the February 25 order, capture the bench's exasperation with inaction amid affluence.
Cleanup Mandate: Nodal Officer to Lead the Charge
The court directed the Board's standing counsel to nominate a "competent and responsible officer" as nodal officer, backed by a team, and submit an implementation framework. Posting is set for . Connected matters (DBP 64/2025, WP(C) 32689/2023) stand linked.
This ruling signals stricter oversight on temple administrations, potentially spurring reforms across Kerala's devaswom boards. With devotee footfall unyielding, effective execution could restore sanctity—or invite further judicial intervention if lapses persist. As media reports echo, the stakes for public faith and health are sky-high.
