Case Law
Subject : Motor Vehicles Law - Road Safety
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Taking a stern view of blatant road safety violations, the Kerala High Court has directed the Transport Commissioner and the State Police Chief to report on actions taken against the dangerous trend of vlogging inside the driver's cabin of moving buses and trucks, and the widespread use of illegally modified vehicles.
The Division Bench, comprising Justice Anil K. Narendran and Justice Muralee Krishna S. , initiated these proceedings suo motu (on its own motion) to address the growing menace of vehicles openly flouting safety norms, thereby endangering passengers and other road users.
The court's order highlighted the alarming practice of fitting contract and stage carriages with unauthorized high-intensity lights, powerful sound systems, and even alternative power sources with inverters, which are often showcased in promotional videos on YouTube and other social media platforms. The bench noted that these modifications are in direct violation of established safety standards, including AIS-008 (Installation Requirements of Lighting) and AIS-052 (Code of Practice for Bus Body Design and Approval) .
The court expressed serious concern over vloggers creating videos from the driver's compartment of moving contract carriages and heavy goods vehicles, a practice that distracts the driver and poses a significant threat to public safety.
The High Court heavily relied on the recent Supreme Court judgment in S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India (2025) , which had addressed similar hazards. The bench quoted the Apex Court's observations on the dangers posed by: - Dazzling LED Headlights: Causing temporary visual disorientation and glare for oncoming drivers and pedestrians. - Unauthorized Red-Blue Strobe Lights & Hooters: Misused by private vehicles to create a false sense of authority, leading to panic and traffic disruptions, while undermining the effectiveness of genuine emergency services.
The High Court underscored the Supreme Court's direction in Paragraph 35.15 of the S. Rajaseekaran judgment, which mandated a complete ban on such unauthorized lights and hooters, enforced through seizures, market crackdowns, and penalties.
In its order dated November 19, 2025, the Kerala High Court has specifically sought a report from the state authorities on the measures being implemented to curb these violations. The key directions are: - To detail the action taken against videography by vloggers inside the driver's cabins of moving commercial vehicles. - To report on the steps taken to prevent the use of vehicles that openly flout safety standards prescribed under AIS-008 and AIS-052. - To address the illegal installation of DJ lights, laser lights, high-power music systems, and hazardous alternative power sources within passenger vehicles.
This judicial intervention signals a zero-tolerance approach towards vehicular modifications that compromise safety for entertainment or aesthetics. By demanding accountability from the Transport Commissioner and the State Police Chief, the court aims to enforce existing safety regulations more stringently and crack down on the culture of impunity often promoted through social media. The order serves as a strong warning to vehicle owners, operators, and vloggers that such dangerous activities will not be overlooked.
The court has scheduled the matter for further hearing on November 21, 2025, to review the action-taken report from the authorities.
#RoadSafety #KeralaHighCourt #MotorVehicleAct
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.