Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Service Law
CHENNAI: Taking serious note of the widespread issue of bogus community certificates and the inordinate delays in their verification, the Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to constitute the required number of State Level Scrutiny Committees (SLSC) to expedite pending inquiries. The division bench, comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice K. Rajasekar , emphasized that such measures are crucial to protect the "sanctity of the reservation policy."
The court issued the directions while disposing of a writ petition filed by the Bank of Baroda, which sought timely verification of the community status of 22 of its employees.
Bank of Baroda approached the High Court expressing its grievance that numerous inquiries into the authenticity of community certificates, submitted by its employees to secure jobs under the reservation quota, were languishing before the SLSC. The bank highlighted the administrative deadlock it faced, particularly in settling retirement benefits for employees who were on the verge of superannuation while facing charges related to fraudulent certificates. The bank's latest representation on this matter was dated March 11, 2025.
The bench observed that the delay by the SLSC was a matter of rising concern, not just for the petitioner bank but for the integrity of public employment as a whole. The court pointed out two significant problems: the issuance of bogus certificates by revenue authorities and the non-cooperation of accused employees during the verification process.
In a pivotal move, the court suo motu impleaded the Secretary to the Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, to ensure the government takes direct responsibility for resolving the issue.
The judgment highlighted key directives for the state government and its authorities:
"The respondents are directed to ensure that required number of State Level Scrutiny Committees are constituted for effective disposal of the enquiries pending before the Committee and further ensure that the community certificates are issued after complete scrutiny and by way of conducting appropriate enquiry as per the procedures contemplated."
The court also underscored the need for accountability, stating that officials issuing bogus certificates must be held responsible and that disciplinary action should be taken against authorities for lapses, dereliction of duty, and negligence.
The High Court reiterated the importance of adhering to the procedures laid down in government order G.O.(Ms).No.104, dated August 21, 2023. This manual mandates a strict timeline, including completing inquiries "as expeditiously as possible preferably by day-to-day proceedings within a period not exceeding two months."
Addressing the issue of employees delaying proceedings, the court clarified:
"...in the event of non-cooperation by any of the party, the State Level Scrutiny Committee or the competent Authority is empowered to record such non-cooperation and proceed with the matter without any further delay. Importantly, reasons and the non-cooperation must be specified in the order itself."
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the government to pass appropriate orders to set up additional committees within six weeks from the receipt of the court's order. Furthermore, the Registry was instructed to communicate the order to the Chief Secretary of Tamil Nadu to ensure government-wide compliance.
This judgment serves as a significant directive aimed at clearing the backlog of certificate verification cases, reinforcing the integrity of the reservation system, and holding both fraudulent beneficiaries and complicit officials accountable.
#MadrasHighCourt #ReservationPolicy #CommunityCertificate
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.