Case Law
Subject : Constitutional Law - Writ Petition
CHENNAI – The Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the legality of the Tamil Nadu government's 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin Scheme', imposing a cost of ₹1,00,000 on the petitioner. The court's decision was based on a prior ruling by the Supreme Court on a connected matter.
A Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan , delivered the brief order after counsel for both parties acknowledged that the apex court had already settled the issue.
The writ petition was filed by Dr. M. Sathya Kumar, who appeared as a party-in-person. The PIL contested the health scheme announced by the Tamil Nadu government through a press release dated July 27, 2025. The petitioner raised several significant legal and constitutional objections against the scheme.
Dr. Kumar's petition sought to declare the 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin Scheme' unconstitutional on multiple grounds:
Improper Naming: The petitioner argued against naming a publicly funded scheme after the incumbent Chief Minister, Mr. M.K. Stalin.
Lack of Legislative Backing: The plea contended that the scheme was implemented without proper legislative authority.
Data Privacy Violations: A central argument was that the scheme violated the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 , and the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. The petition alleged that the collection, processing, and storage of personal and health-related data were being carried out without informed consent and a lawful data protection framework.
Constitutional Breaches: The petitioner claimed the scheme was arbitrary and illegal, violating Articles 13, 14, and 221 of the Constitution.
The plea requested the court to quash the press release, restrain the government from using the scheme's title, and order the immediate cessation of data collection, along with the permanent deletion of all data already gathered.
During the hearing, the counsel representing the parties, including Advocate-General Mr. P.S. Raman for the State, "fairly submit[ted]" that the Supreme Court had already adjudicated a connected matter on August 6, 2025, and had dismissed the writ petition before it.
Accepting this submission, the Madras High Court swiftly disposed of the present petition. In its order, the Bench stated:
"Counsel for parties fairly submit that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has already decided the connected matter on 06.08.2025. The said writ petition was dismissed. Therefore, this petition is dismissed in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, with cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only)."
The High Court's order effectively closes the door on this specific challenge to the 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin Scheme' at the state level, reaffirming the binding nature of the Supreme Court's precedent. The imposition of significant costs on the petitioner also serves as a deterrent against filing litigation on issues that have already been settled by a higher judicial forum. The dismissal implies that the legal and constitutional challenges raised against the scheme did not find favour with the Supreme Court, whose reasoning now governs the matter.
#MadrasHighCourt #PublicInterestLitigation #DataPrivacy
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.