Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Public Law
Chennai, February 9, 2024
– The Madras High Court has granted permission to
Mr. Bhagavath Singh filed a writ petition (WP No. 34716 of 2023) challenging the Chennai City Police Commissioner's rejection of his request to hold an indefinite fast near the Collector's office or the Thiruvalluvar Statue. His protest aimed to pressure the central government to implement a 2006 Tamil Nadu government proposal for using Tamil in High Court proceedings, referencing Article 348(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 7 of the Official Languages Act, 1963.
The case saw multiple hearings, with the court initially seeking time for instructions from the respondent. The location for the fast was debated, eventually settling on a venue near the Rajarathinam Stadium. The respondent raised concerns about potential law and order issues arising from an indefinite fast.
The court, however, acknowledged the petitioner's right to peaceful protest, noting that the objective of promoting Tamil in court proceedings is not illegal. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh stated that “There is nothing illegal in this objective. Hence, permission can be granted subject to the following conditions…”
The court imposed several conditions to ensure the protest remains peaceful and lawful:
The Madras High Court ultimately granted permission for the indefinite fast, commencing February 28th, 2024, subject to the aforementioned conditions. The court emphasized the importance of peaceful protest while safeguarding public order. The case serves as a reminder of the balance between fundamental rights and the need to maintain law and order. The court's judgment highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the use of regional languages in official proceedings. The court's disposition of the petition emphasizes the importance of balancing fundamental rights with the need for public order.
#MadrasHighCourt #RightToProtest #TamilLanguage #MadrasHighCourt
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.