Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Public Law
Chennai, February 9, 2024
– The Madras High Court has granted permission to
Mr. Bhagavath Singh filed a writ petition (WP No. 34716 of 2023) challenging the Chennai City Police Commissioner's rejection of his request to hold an indefinite fast near the Collector's office or the Thiruvalluvar Statue. His protest aimed to pressure the central government to implement a 2006 Tamil Nadu government proposal for using Tamil in High Court proceedings, referencing Article 348(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 7 of the Official Languages Act, 1963.
The case saw multiple hearings, with the court initially seeking time for instructions from the respondent. The location for the fast was debated, eventually settling on a venue near the Rajarathinam Stadium. The respondent raised concerns about potential law and order issues arising from an indefinite fast.
The court, however, acknowledged the petitioner's right to peaceful protest, noting that the objective of promoting Tamil in court proceedings is not illegal. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh stated that “There is nothing illegal in this objective. Hence, permission can be granted subject to the following conditions…”
The court imposed several conditions to ensure the protest remains peaceful and lawful:
The Madras High Court ultimately granted permission for the indefinite fast, commencing February 28th, 2024, subject to the aforementioned conditions. The court emphasized the importance of peaceful protest while safeguarding public order. The case serves as a reminder of the balance between fundamental rights and the need to maintain law and order. The court's judgment highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the use of regional languages in official proceedings. The court's disposition of the petition emphasizes the importance of balancing fundamental rights with the need for public order.
#MadrasHighCourt #RightToProtest #TamilLanguage #MadrasHighCourt
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.