Case Law
Subject : Criminal Law - Police Investigation and Jurisdiction
In a significant ruling on police jurisdictional limits, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar has set aside a lower court's directive to involve a specialized police unit in investigating a custodial death case. The decision underscores the boundaries of investigative powers under recent government notifications, emphasizing that magistrates must respect the specific remits of police agencies.
The petition, CRM(M) No. 354/2022, was filed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Kashmir (formerly part of the Crime Branch), represented by advocate Ms. Maha Majid. The respondents included Shafiqua Muneer and another unnamed party, with no representation appearing on their behalf.
The dispute arose from a complaint by respondent No. 1 (Shafiqua Muneer), alleging that her son was tortured to death in custody by police officials at Police Station Nowgam. On July 15, 2022, the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (City Judge), Srinagar, ordered the Station House Officer of Police Station Crime Branch, Srinagar, to register an FIR against respondent No. 2 and unknown officials, and conduct the investigation through an efficient officer.
The petitioner challenged the order solely on jurisdictional grounds, arguing that the Economic Offences Wing lacks authority to probe such cases. Counsel highlighted that Notification S.O 232 dated May 9, 2022, designates the Economic Offences Wing as a police station with powers vested in its Superintendent but limits its scope to specific economic offences listed in the annexure. Custodial torture and killing do not feature in this list, placing the matter outside the wing's purview.
No counter-arguments were presented, as respondents did not appear. The court, after hearing the petitioner's side and reviewing the record, focused on the notification's explicit delimitations.
The court drew on the precedent set by a coordinate bench in S. Balbir Singh vs. Ishar Das , 2010(3) JKJ [HC] 180. That case examined similar powers under the now-superseded SRO 202 of 1999, ruling that magistrates can only direct the Crime Branch (or its successor) to investigate if the offence falls within its jurisdictional scope. Otherwise, directions must go to the relevant jurisdictional police station.
Justice Sanjay Dhar applied this principle, noting that Section 482 of the Cr.P.C allows inherent powers to prevent abuse of process, but only within the framework of statutory jurisdictions like S.O 232. The judgment clarified that expanding investigative mandates beyond notified offences undermines the specialized structure of law enforcement agencies.
Pivotal excerpt from the ruling: "Such type of offence does not find mention in the list of offences mentioned in Annexure to S.O 232 dated 09.05.2022. Therefore, the learned trial Magistrate was not empowered to direct Economic Offences Wing, Srinagar to register an FIR and investigate the case, as the same is beyond the jurisdiction of aforesaid Investigating Agency."
On December 3, 2025, Justice Sanjay Dhar allowed the petition, quashing the magistrate's July 15, 2022, order as unsustainable in law. The case was remanded to the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (City Judge), Srinagar, with directions to pass fresh orders on Shafiqua Muneer's complaint in accordance with the law—likely routing the investigation to the appropriate jurisdictional police station, such as Nowgam.
This ruling reinforces the importance of adhering to specialized police jurisdictions, potentially affecting how complaints of custodial misconduct are handled in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. It serves as a reminder to lower courts to verify agency remits before issuing investigative directives, ensuring efficient and lawful probes into serious allegations like custodial deaths. Legal experts anticipate it may influence future cases involving inter-agency investigations, promoting clarity in a complex policing landscape.
#CriminalJurisdiction #PoliceInvestigation #JKHighCourt
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.