Back
State Can't Play Hot Potato with Water Supply: MP High Court Slams Blame-Shifting, Orders Pipeline for Gwalior Colony
In a strongly worded verdict, the has ruled that government bodies cannot evade their duty to provide potable water—a fundamental aspect of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution—by shuffling responsibilities among themselves. Justice Milind Ramesh Phadke directed the to lay water pipelines to ' residential colony in Village Sigora, Gwalior, within three months. This decision underscores the court's intolerance for administrative inertia on essential services.
Echoing broader judicial sentiment, as highlighted in recent reports, the ruling reinforces that
"Access to Potable Water Is Part of Article 21, State Can't Evade Responsibility."
From Permissions to Pipeless Plight: The Colony's Long Wait
, a registered partnership firm and certified coloniser under the , acquired land in Village Sigora (Survey Nos. 637/3, 638, 639, 678, 680/1) spanning several hectares. In , it secured registration from the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gwalior, followed by a Nazul No Objection Certificate in and development permission from the on .
The firm completed all internal development works, earning a completion certificate from SADA. However, external infrastructure—like water pipelines under of the 1999 Rules—remained undone despite the firm paying required charges. SADA cited financial woes and handed over its water treatment plant to MP Jal Nigam via government orders in and . The petitioner's writ under sought to enforce pipeline laying.
Petitioner's Plea: 'We Paid, You Lay'
Represented by advocate , argued it fulfilled all obligations, including fees to SADA (Respondent No. 2). They stressed (v) and (vi) mandates external works like water supply. Highlighting a government order transferring SADA's plant to MP Jal Nigam (Respondent No. 3) with instructions to supply colonies in the Counter Magnet area, and a contract for a multi-village scheme covering Sigora among 28 villages, they urged the court to pin responsibility on the executing agency.
Respondents' Rebuttal: 'Not Our Pipeline, Not Our Problem'
SADA's counsel, , positioned it as a mere planner, not executor, deflecting to MP Jal Nigam under schemes like Jal Jeevan Mission . They noted 36.94 km of 70.737 km pipelines laid, but claimed the colony wasn't specifically requested or within scope.
MP Jal Nigam's advocate, , emphasized its role in the 5 MLD scheme for 35,218 residents across 28 villages per Census. No direct contract with the petitioner existed, and extensions required formal requests. The , governed operations, with work phased per approvals—no room for ad-hoc colony connections.
Court's Sharp Scalpel: No Escape Through Buck-Passing
The court cut through the finger-pointing, noting undisputed facts: permissions granted, internal works done, scheme covering Sigora without area restrictions, and transfer orders explicitly tasking MP Jal Nigam with colony supplies.
Justice Phadke invoked Article 21 , declaring potable water access integral to life. No precedents were cited, but the reasoning hinged on statutory duties under 1999 Rules and government directives, rejecting scope limitations as the scheme inherently serves village areas like Sigora.
Key Observations from the Bench
"It is of a common knowledge that the State instrumentalities cannot evade their responsibilities by shifting the burden upon one another, particularly when it concerns the provision of basic civic amenities such as potable drinking water. The right to access water is an integral part to right to life..."
"Although it would have been appropriate for respondent No.1 to proactively coordinate and ensure that its instrumentalities discharge their respective obligations, the failure to do so doesn't give any right to Respondents No.2 and 3 to shred their responsibilities and deny the residents their basic entitlement."
Pipeline Deadline: Three Months to Quench the Thirst
The was allowed, with MP Jal Nigam ordered
"to undertake the work of laying water pipelines up to the petitioner’s colony situated at Village Sigora, District Gwalior, and to ensure supply of potable water to the residents therein... within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order."
This ruling sets a precedent against inter-agency blame games, potentially spurring action in similar underserved colonies. Residents gain immediate relief, while developers and authorities face clearer accountability for external amenities under Madhya Pradesh's colonization framework.
