NCLT Bengaluru Sanctions Amalgamation of Intuit India Entities Under S.230-232 of Companies Act, 2013, Accepting Undertakings on Regulatory Objections

NCLT Bengaluru Approves Merger of Two Intuit India Companies, Emphasizes Compliance Through Undertakings

Bengaluru, India – The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru Bench, has sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation for two Indian subsidiaries of the global financial technology giant Intuit Inc. In an order delivered on September 12, 2025, the bench comprising Hon’ble Shri Sunil Kumar Aggarwal (Member, Judicial) and Hon’ble Shri Radhakrishna Sreepada (Member, Technical) approved the merger of Intuit India Software Solutions Private Limited (the Transferor Company) with Intuit India Product Development Centre Private Limited (the Transferee Company).

The decision clears the path for the consolidation of the two entities, effective from the appointed date of April 1, 2023. The approval came after the companies provided comprehensive undertakings addressing a series of observations and concerns raised by multiple statutory authorities.

Case Background

The petition, filed under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013, sought the NCLT's approval for the merger scheme. The Transferor Company, Intuit India Software Solutions, is a subsidiary of the Transferee Company, Intuit India Product Development Centre. The rationale behind the merger, as approved by the companies' boards, aims to streamline operations and create a more integrated business structure.

As per procedural requirements, the NCLT had directed the petitioner companies to serve notices to various regulatory bodies, including the Regional Director (RD), Registrar of Companies (ROC), Official Liquidator (OL), Income Tax Department, and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Regulatory Scrutiny and Company Undertakings

Several authorities filed reports with observations that required clarification from the petitioner companies. The NCLT's order meticulously details these issues and the corresponding responses, which were crucial for securing the final approval.

Key observations and undertakings included:

• Regional Director (RD) & Registrar of Companies (ROC): The RD and ROC raised 21 points, questioning the ante-dated appointed date, discrepancies in capital structure, the share swap ratio, outstanding statutory dues, employee interests (including ESPPs), and payment of stamp duty on increased authorized capital.

  • The companies justified the appointed date by citing an MCA circular, clarified that the capital structure difference was due to rounding off, and provided a valuation report to support the swap ratio. They gave undertakings to settle all statutory and disputed dues, protect employee rights and ESPPs without any adverse changes, and pay the requisite fees on the consolidated authorized share capital.

• Income Tax Department: The department highlighted significant outstanding tax demands and pending proceedings against both companies.

  • The companies confirmed they would address all demands as they crystallize and that the Transferee Company would assume all tax liabilities of the Transferor Company post-merger, submitting an indemnity bond to this effect. Satisfied with these assurances, the IT Department ultimately gave its no-objection.

• Reserve Bank of India (RBI): The RBI noted a pending clarification from 2012 related to a Form FC-GPR filing for foreign direct investment (FDI).

  • The Transferee Company acknowledged the oversight and undertook to promptly respond to the pending RBI query. It also confirmed that it would remain liable for any past or future contraventions under FEMA regulations.

• Official Liquidator (OL): The OL's report focused on ensuring that no inquiry was pending against the companies and that employee interests were protected.

  • The companies reiterated the clause in the scheme ensuring that all employees of the Transferor Company would be absorbed by the Transferee Company on terms no less favorable than their current employment.

The Tribunal's Decision

After hearing the counsel for the petitioners and the regulatory bodies, and upon reviewing the detailed affidavits and undertakings submitted by the companies, the NCLT concluded that all objections had been satisfactorily addressed.

"In view of the above discussion, it is observed that the objections/observations to the Scheme received from ROC/RD, RBI, OL and I.T Department have been adequately replied by the Petitioner Company and hence there is no impediment in approval of the Scheme," the bench stated in its order.

The Tribunal sanctioned the scheme, making it binding on all shareholders and creditors. It clarified that the order does not grant any exemption from stamp duty, taxes, or other applicable legal requirements. Following the sanction, the Transferor Company, Intuit India Software Solutions Private Limited, will stand dissolved without the process of winding-up.

The NCLT further directed the Transferee Company to file a certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days and ensure compliance with all its undertakings and relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.