Case Law
Subject : Corporate Law - Mergers & Acquisitions
CHENNAI: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, has allowed an application filed by Cultfit Healthcare Private Limited and its associated companies, paving the way for a complex corporate restructuring. In an order dated September 11, 2025, the bench comprising Hon’ble Shri. Sanjiv Jain (Member Judicial) and Hon’ble Shri. Venkataraman Subramaniam (Member Technical) directed the companies to convene meetings for specific classes of shareholders and creditors to vote on the proposed "Composite Scheme of Arrangement."
The joint application was filed by three entities within the Cultfit group:
1. Cultfit Healthcare Private Limited (Demerged Company-1 / Transferee Company)
2. Curefit Services Private Limited (Demerged Company-2 / Transferor Company)
3. Curefit Healthcare Private Limited (Resulting Company)
The companies approached the NCLT under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking approval for a multi-layered restructuring plan. The scheme involves:
* Demerger: The transfer of specific business undertakings—namely the "Cult Demerged Undertaking" from Cultfit Healthcare and the "Services Demerged Undertaking" from Curefit Services—into Curefit Healthcare.
* Amalgamation: The subsequent merger of the remaining business of Curefit Services into Cultfit Healthcare.
The companies argued that this arrangement would create a more efficient corporate structure, consolidate similar business operations, reduce administrative duplication, and unlock value for stakeholders by allowing for focused management of different business verticals.
The core of the application was the request to either convene or dispense with meetings of various stakeholders based on consents already obtained. The Tribunal meticulously reviewed the consents submitted and issued the following key directions:
Meetings Dispensed: The NCLT agreed to dispense with meetings for classes where the companies had secured 100% consent via affidavits. This included:
Meetings Convened: The Tribunal determined that meetings were necessary for classes where consent was not unanimous. It ordered meetings to be held on October 29, 2025, at the companies' Bengaluru corporate office for:
To ensure a fair and transparent process, the Tribunal laid down a clear procedural framework.
* Chairperson and Scrutinizer: Mr. Kanwal Jeet Arora was appointed as the Chairperson for the meetings, with Mr. Sriram Ananth V appointed as the Scrutinizer.
* Notices and Publication: The companies are required to send individual notices to all relevant stakeholders 30 days in advance and publish advertisements in English, Tamil, and Kannada newspapers.
* Statutory Compliance: The Tribunal directed the companies to serve notices of the scheme to the Regional Director (MCA), Registrar of Companies, the Income Tax Department, and other relevant sectoral regulators.
The NCLT’s order marks the first crucial step in the approval process for the Cultfit group's restructuring. By allowing the application and ordering the necessary meetings, the Tribunal has set the stage for stakeholders to vote on the proposed scheme. The outcome of these meetings, to be reported by the Chairperson, will determine whether the companies can proceed to the next stage of seeking final approval for the merger and demerger. This move reflects a strategic effort by the health and fitness giant to streamline its operations for future growth.
#NCLT #CorporateRestructuring #Cultfit
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.