Case Law
Subject : Corporate Law - Mergers and Acquisitions
Mumbai, Maharashtra - The Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has issued key directives for a proposed composite scheme of arrangement involving four InCred Group companies, paving the way for a significant corporate restructuring. The bench, comprising Hon’ble Shri Ashish Kalia (Member, Judicial) and Hon’ble Shri Sanjiv Dutt (Member, Technical), approved the first motion application, outlining the procedural path forward for the complex merger and demerger plan.
The Tribunal largely dispensed with the requirement to convene meetings for most classes of shareholders and creditors, while ordering meetings for the equity shareholders and secured creditors of InCred Capital Financial Services Limited.
The application, filed under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involves a multi-step composite scheme designed to streamline operations, consolidate regulated businesses, and enhance management focus. The key components of the plan, with an appointed date of April 1, 2025, are:
The stated rationale behind this intricate arrangement is to achieve greater operational efficiencies, cost savings through the elimination of duplicate processes, and a more focused management approach for different business verticals. The companies stated that the scheme "is in the interest of all the shareholders, creditors and other stakeholders... and is not prejudicial to the interests of the concerned shareholders, creditors or the public at large."
The applicants, represented by Advocate Hemant Sethi, argued for dispensing with several statutory meetings, citing unanimous consent from various stakeholders and the nature of the scheme.
The NCLT carefully considered the status of shareholders and creditors for each of the four applicant companies:
On the matter of dispensing with the unsecured creditors' meeting, the Tribunal noted:
"The Learned Counsel for the Applicant Companies submits that the Unsecured Creditors are not affected by the Scheme in any manner and there is no compromise or arrangement envisaged with them... The net worth of all Applicant Companies is positive... it does not affect the rights or interests of Unsecured Creditors. Further, there exists a catena of judicial precedents reiterating the settled principle of law that where a scheme does not involve any arrangement with creditors, their consent may be dispensed with."
The Tribunal appointed Shri. M.K Dubey as the Chairperson and Mr. Mitesh Shah as the Scrutinizer for the mandated meetings of InCred Capital Financial Services Limited.
The InCred Group companies are now required to serve notices to various regulatory authorities, including the Regional Director (MCA), Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Department, RBI, and SEBI, who will have 30 days to file any objections. Following the conclusion of the court-convened meetings and receipt of regulatory reports, the companies will file a second motion petition with the NCLT seeking final sanction for the composite scheme. The final order will determine the legal effectiveness of this major restructuring in India's financial services landscape.
#NCLT #CorporateRestructuring #CompaniesAct2013
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.