Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Pollution Control / Industrial Regulation
New Delhi:
The National Green Tribunal (Principal Bench), comprising Judicial Member Justice
Arun Kumar Tyagi
and Expert Member Dr.
The judgment stems from an Execution Application (EA No. 07/2025) filed by Hassina Wajid, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Chaktroo, seeking compliance with a previous NGT order dated September 4, 2024, which had directed the relocation of M/s. Dewan Stone Crusher and M/s. Shahzad Shubnum Contractor Hot Mix Plant due to violations of siting norms and environmental laws.
Background of the Case:
The original application (OA No. 151/2023) filed by Hassina Wajid alleged that the stone crusher and hot mix plant units operated by respondents 6, 7, and 8 were violating environmental laws, including illegal mining, operating too close to residential areas (100-200 meters vs. required 500 meters), lacking proper pollution control measures (wind breaking walls, dust suppression, metalled roads, green belt), and dumping waste in a water body.
In its September 4, 2024 order, the NGT had found the units were established and operated in violation of siting norms and environmental laws. It directed the units to be removed from the site within two months, prohibited their operation until relocation, and imposed an interim environmental compensation of Rs. 7,20,000 (which has since been deposited). The
Following this, the project proponents (respondents 6-8) approached the Supreme Court, which, while dismissing their appeal, noted the possibility of relaxation under J&K PCC guidelines and stated that any such relaxation would require NGT approval. This paved the way for the current applications.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's direction and an application by the project proponent, the
The Expert Committee inspected the site and reported the existence of distinct geographical barriers in the hilly area, including elevation differences (residential houses 15-125m higher than the unit), thick vegetation cover, a district road, and a nearby nullah, which they deemed capable of cushioning the impact of the stone crusher's operation. They also conducted monitoring, finding noise and particulate matter levels around the residential area and school to be within permissible limits when the stone crusher was operating (though the applicant contested the testing conditions). The nearest residential houses were found within 150m (specifically 3 houses), while others within 500m were scattered and at higher elevations. The nearest school was 400m away.
Based on these findings and the installation of pollution control devices, the Expert Committee recommended granting consent to operate the stone crusher during daytime hours (8 am - 6 pm). For the hot mix plant, located 470m from the school and 180m from the nearest house, the committee noted requisite PCDs were installed but it was not operational during inspection. They nonetheless recommended granting consent for the hot mix plant for limited working seasons against work orders.
The
Applicant's Objections and Tribunal's Analysis:
Hassina Wajid strongly objected to the relaxation, arguing that the Expert Committee was improperly constituted as it lacked the Regional Director
The Tribunal, however, found the objections to the committee's constitution to be weak, holding the guideline's provision on committee members to be "directory" and noting the applicant did not challenge its composition earlier. It dismissed the allegation of manipulated testing results due to lack of concrete evidence. The Tribunal clarified that Clause 3.3, allowing relaxation based on distinct geographical barriers, acts as an exception to the general siting criteria in Clause 3, including the 150m residential setback.
Balancing the need for environmental protection with national priorities and strategic infrastructure projects (the units undertake government road construction projects under Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana in border areas, as highlighted by the project proponents), the Tribunal accepted the Expert Committee's findings regarding the distinct geographical barriers in the hilly terrain cushioning the impact and the pollution levels being within norms at the monitored locations.
The Tribunal referenced the difficulty in hilly areas to find sites meeting stringent criteria (like 500m from residential areas), as acknowledged in Clause 3.2 of the guidelines. It concluded that there were valid grounds to approve the relaxation of siting criteria for the Stone Crusher based on the Expert Committee's report and
Hot Mix Plant Relaxation Denied:
Crucially, the NGT denied relaxation for the Hot Mix Plant. It found the Expert Committee's recommendation for the hot mix plant unreliable because the plant was
not
operational during the inspection, making any assessment of its environmental impact at that time invalid. The Tribunal noted that the
Accountability for Past Violations:
Taking a serious view of the admitted past violations and the mutually contradictory distance certificates issued at the time of establishment, the Tribunal observed that the non-compliance with siting criteria implied "submission of factually wrong reports" by concerned revenue officers and "facilitated environmental violations" by
The Chief Secretary, Government of J&K, and the Chairman,
Environmental Compensation and Rejuvenation:
While the interim environmental compensation of Rs. 7,20,000 has been paid, the Tribunal noted that
Final Directions:
The NGT disposed of the Execution Application and the Miscellaneous Application with the following key directions:
The Tribunal emphasized that "public interest in protection and improvement of environment" must override considerations of private loss and gain. The applicant retains the liberty to file a fresh execution application if non-compliance occurs.
The order highlights the NGT's approach of balancing developmental needs with stringent environmental protection, while also addressing accountability within the administrative and regulatory bodies tasked with enforcing environmental laws.
#NGT #EnvironmentalLaw #PollutionControl #NationalGreenTribunal
Madras HC Directs Municipality to Auction Amusement Rides Licenses on Vaigai Riverbed for Chithirai Festival: Madurai Bench
17 Apr 2026
TCS Nashik Accused Seek Bail in Harassment Probe
17 Apr 2026
Insurer Liable for Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle, Can Recover from Owner: Kerala High Court
17 Apr 2026
MP High Court Issues Notice in PIL Alleging Disrespect to National Song 'Vande Mataram' by Indore Councillors: Article 51A(a)
17 Apr 2026
Bombay HC Grants NSE Ad-Interim Relief Against Fake Social Media Accounts Infringing 'NSE' Trademark: Platforms Must Takedown in 36 Hours
18 Apr 2026
Supreme Court Tags Challenges to UP Gangsters Act with Similar Organised Crime Laws from Gujarat, Maharashtra: Refers to 3-Judge Bench
18 Apr 2026
Loan Repayments for Assets Can't Reduce Maintenance Under Section 144 BNSS: Supreme Court
18 Apr 2026
Fernandez Seeks to Turn Approver in ₹200 Cr PMLA Case
18 Apr 2026
Prosecution Can't Gatekeep Witnesses: Rajasthan HC Directs Summoning of Doctor Under Section 311 CrPC for Just Decision
18 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.