Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Pollution Control Litigation
New Delhi:
The National Green Tribunal (
The case originated from a letter petition dated May 14, 2022, by Mr. Sumit
Mr.
* Air Pollution: Black smoke and ash from factory chimneys settling on rooftops, leading to respiratory problems. Allegations that most factories lacked proper pollution control systems like multi-cyclones, water scrubbers, or bag filters.
* Water Pollution: Suspicions of untreated industrial wastewater, including glue-making effluent containing urea and chemicals, being discharged into the ground through borewells, contaminating drinking water sources with saltpetre.
* Improper Waste Disposal: Concerns about the disposal of "fly ash" (later clarified by industries as "wood ash").
* Regulatory Lapses: Questioned the issuance of No Objection Certificates (NOCs) for factories in residential areas and the efficacy of HSPCB's monitoring. He also pointed out outdated emission standards for the plywood industry.
* Other Issues: The original letter also raised concerns about a new CNG plant, a municipal solid waste dump site, and industrial effluent in the Yamuna river, which were dealt with separately.
The
* Initial Reports: Early reports by the Joint Committee and HSPCB suggested that the units were largely compliant, possessing valid Consents to Operate (CTOs) and adequate Air Pollution Control Measures (APCMs), primarily cyclones. They claimed no trade effluent was generated, only domestic effluent managed by septic tanks.
*
*
Later Inspections and Reports:
Subsequent inspections provided unit-wise details, including CTO validity, Forest Department licenses, and claims of wood ash disposal to farmers for low-lying area filling. However, the
The respondent plywood industries generally contended that:
* They use wood waste as fuel, generating "wood ash," not "fly ash."
* This wood ash is collected in bags and given to local farmers for filling and levelling purposes, or to contractors for construction sites.
* They possess valid CTOs, and permissions for borewells (many of which were pending renewal).
* Plantations had been carried out on their premises.
* They were compliant with environmental norms.
The
* Pollution Sources: Air pollution from boilers, wood sawing, glue application (formaldehyde emissions), and transport. Water pollution from log soaking, chemical leaching, and resin washing. Soil contamination from stored wood waste and chemical runoff.
* Health Impacts: Formaldehyde, a human carcinogen used in glues, poses risks to workers. Wood dust and hydrocarbon fumes can cause respiratory issues.
*
Regulatory Framework:
The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court's directives in the
*
Deficiencies in HSPCB's Actions:
The
*
Environmental Clearance for Resin Plants:
The Tribunal clarified that plywood units with captive resin plants (manufacturing
*
Wood Ash Disposal:
The
*
Greenbelt and APCMs:
The
* Groundwater: Concerns were raised about groundwater extraction without valid, up-to-date NOCs and potential contamination.
The
CTO Review for Certain Units: HSPCB to review and incorporate basic industry information, verify compliance, and impose appropriate pollution control conditions in CTOs for M/s. Duna Panels Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Pragati Industries, M/s. Nagpal Wood Industries, M/s. Baba Plywood Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Metro Plyboards Pvt. Ltd., and M/s. Krishna Enterprises.
Inspection for Captive Resin Plants & EC: HSPCB to inspect 15 named units to verify if they have captive resin manufacturing plants. If so, their CTO for resin plants is to be revoked, and closure orders for resin plants issued until EC is obtained.
Chemical Safeguards:
HSPCB to inspect all 28 units for safeguards in storing and using chemicals like formaldehyde/glue and take action. Report to
SOP for Wood Ash Management: HSPCB to prepare and implement an SOP for verifying proper wood ash disposal and verify current disposal practices.
Record-Keeping by Industries: All 28 Project Proponents to maintain records of wood ash generation/disposal and submit quarterly reports to HSPCB.
Verification of APCMs:
HSPCB to verify installation and adequacy of air pollution control equipment (including for fugitive emissions) in all 28 units. Report to
Greenbelt Verification by DFO: Divisional Forest Officer, Yamuna Nagar, to verify plantation adequacy in all 28 units, report deficiencies, suggest remedial measures, and estimate costs within 1 month.
HSPCB to Enforce Greenbelt: HSPCB to review CTOs to include greenbelt conditions and direct all 28 units to raise adequate plantations as per DFO's recommendations.
Instructions for Greenbelt in CTOs: Member Secretary, HSPCB, to issue instructions for imposing greenbelt conditions in new CTOs and renewals.
Industries to Develop Greenbelts:
All 28 units to raise plantations/greenbelts around periphery and village roads during the forthcoming monsoon and file compliance reports in 4 months with
Groundwater Monitoring:
HSPCB to sample borewell and groundwater, analyze for domestic and industrial effluent parameters, take action, and report to
Flow Meters & Water Consumption Records:
All 28 units to install flow meters on borewells, maintain groundwater consumption records, and file compliance reports in 4 months with
Information on HSPCB Website:
HSPCB to upload details of Haryana plywood industries and their compliance status on its website. Report to
MoEF&CC to Frame Guidelines:
MoEF&CC directed to frame requisite national guidelines for plywood industries. Action taken report to
Further Listing: Registrar General to list matter if reports are not filed or further directions are needed.
This landmark judgment underscores the
Case Details:
*
Lead Case No.:
Original Application No. 849/2024 (Sumit
* Court: National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi
* Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prakash Shrivastava (Chairperson), Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi (Judicial Member), Hon’ble Dr. A. Senthil Vel (Expert Member)
*
Applicant:
Mr. Sumit
*
Counsel for Respondents (Plywood Industries):
Mr.
* Counsel for State Respondents (State of Haryana, HSPCB, SEIAA, DC Yamuna Nagar): Mr. Rahul Khurana
* Date Reserved: October 23, 2024
* Date Pronounced: May 27, 2025
#EnvironmentalLaw #NGTJudgement #PollutionControl #NationalGreenTribunal
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.