Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Pollution Control and Environmental Compensation
New Delhi:
The National Green Tribunal (
The decision came in original applications filed by
The core issue revolved around allegations that approximately 343 stone crushers in District
The
Based on the "Polluter Pays" principle, the
This order was challenged before the Supreme Court. In one appeal (M/s Chander Stone Crusher Vs. State of Haryana, C.A. No. 5550/2023), the Supreme Court, on November 6, 2023, set aside the interim compensation specifically for that appellant, citing a breach of natural justice as they were not initially party to the
Subsequently, numerous stone crushers were impleaded and heard by the
Following the Supreme Court's directives, the
* Fix final compensation after hearing the stone crushers.
* Ascertain the source of raw material and compliance with norms.
* Assess the carrying capacity of the area.
* Recommend closure of defaulting units, if any.
The Joint Committee submitted its report on April 8, 2024. It calculated environmental compensation for violations between January 1, 2013, and February 1, 2024, using CPCB's methodology.
* For the period 01.01.2013 to 29.04.2019: Rs. 91,81,250 against 16 units.
* For the period 30.04.2019 to 01.02.2024: Rs. 4,00,16,503 against 66 units (of which Rs. 3,20,16,528 was deposited).
* Further recommended EC: Rs. 1,84,56,250 against 28 units for the latter period.
The committee also submitted an assessment of the ambient air carrying capacity for District
In its final order, the
1. Affirmed the Environmental Compensation: The calculation of EC by the Joint Committee was upheld.
2. Directed Recovery: The HSPCB was instructed to recover the pending compensation from the defaulting stone crusher units, using coercive measures if necessary, preferably within three months.
3.
Carrying Capacity Re-assessment:
The Tribunal found the committee's carrying capacity report needed expert validation. > "The above carrying capacity report requires to be cross checked by an expert body, therefore, we direct the District Magistrate,
4. Ensuring Compliance with Carrying Capacity: HSPCB and other regulatory agencies were directed to ensure that the CPCB-verified carrying capacity is not violated.
5. Compliance with Previous Orders: Authorities were directed to comply with other directions from the January 18, 2023 order (except the set-aside paragraph 15 concerning interim compensation) and submit an action taken report within three months.
The
#NGT #EnvironmentalJustice #PollutionControl #NationalGreenTribunal
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.