Case Law
Subject : Environmental Law - Pollution Control and Environmental Compensation
Description :
New Delhi:
The National Green Tribunal (
The decision came in original applications filed by
The core issue revolved around allegations that approximately 343 stone crushers in District
The
Based on the "Polluter Pays" principle, the
This order was challenged before the Supreme Court. In one appeal (M/s Chander Stone Crusher Vs. State of Haryana, C.A. No. 5550/2023), the Supreme Court, on November 6, 2023, set aside the interim compensation specifically for that appellant, citing a breach of natural justice as they were not initially party to the
Subsequently, numerous stone crushers were impleaded and heard by the
Following the Supreme Court's directives, the
* Fix final compensation after hearing the stone crushers.
* Ascertain the source of raw material and compliance with norms.
* Assess the carrying capacity of the area.
* Recommend closure of defaulting units, if any.
The Joint Committee submitted its report on April 8, 2024. It calculated environmental compensation for violations between January 1, 2013, and February 1, 2024, using CPCB's methodology.
* For the period 01.01.2013 to 29.04.2019: Rs. 91,81,250 against 16 units.
* For the period 30.04.2019 to 01.02.2024: Rs. 4,00,16,503 against 66 units (of which Rs. 3,20,16,528 was deposited).
* Further recommended EC: Rs. 1,84,56,250 against 28 units for the latter period.
The committee also submitted an assessment of the ambient air carrying capacity for District
In its final order, the
1. Affirmed the Environmental Compensation: The calculation of EC by the Joint Committee was upheld.
2. Directed Recovery: The HSPCB was instructed to recover the pending compensation from the defaulting stone crusher units, using coercive measures if necessary, preferably within three months.
3.
Carrying Capacity Re-assessment:
The Tribunal found the committee's carrying capacity report needed expert validation. > "The above carrying capacity report requires to be cross checked by an expert body, therefore, we direct the District Magistrate,
4. Ensuring Compliance with Carrying Capacity: HSPCB and other regulatory agencies were directed to ensure that the CPCB-verified carrying capacity is not violated.
5. Compliance with Previous Orders: Authorities were directed to comply with other directions from the January 18, 2023 order (except the set-aside paragraph 15 concerning interim compensation) and submit an action taken report within three months.
The
#NGT #EnvironmentalJustice #PollutionControl #NationalGreenTribunal
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.