Case Law
Subject : Taxation - Income Tax
Guwahati: The Gauhati High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department, affirming the well-established legal principle that no additions can be made in assessments initiated under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for completed assessment years unless based on incriminating material unearthed during the search operation.
A division bench comprising
Chief Justice Mr.
Background of the Case
The respondent,
The AO, in the assessment order dated December 31, 2018, determined the respondent's total income at Rs. 4,25,30,080/-, making an addition of Rs. 4,23,30,000/-. This addition was primarily based on a statement recorded during the search from the respondent's father (Shri
Lower Authorities Quash Addition
Aggrieved by the AO's order, the respondent appealed to the CIT(A). The CIT(A), in an order dated April 8, 2019, allowed the appeal. The CIT(A) held that for AY 2014-15, which was a completed assessment year (as the time limit for issuing a notice under Section 143(2) had expired before the search), the AO could not disturb the assessment unless incriminating material was found during the search. The CIT(A) specifically noted that the AO's order did not refer to any incriminating material found during the search, and the addition was solely based on a retracted statement.
The Income Tax Department then appealed to the ITAT. The ITAT, in its order dated April 7, 2022, upheld the CIT(A)'s findings. The ITAT also concluded that the addition was made solely based on retracted statements and that no other incriminating material was seized during the search to substantiate the addition for the completed assessment year.
High Court's Analysis and Decision
The Revenue preferred an appeal before the High Court, raising two substantial questions of law concerning whether the ITAT was justified in confirming that the assessment for AY 2014-15 was not abated and whether the assessment was correctly held as not abated when no order was passed before the S. 153A order.
The High Court noted the submissions of the respondent's counsel, who argued that the law is now well settled by the Supreme Court that in the absence of incriminating material, no addition can be made in respect of a completed assessment under Section 153A. Reliance was placed on several Supreme Court judgments, including
Principal Commissioner of Income tax, Central 3 Vs.
The Court referred to the
In the present case, AY 2014-15 was a completed assessment year as no notice under Section 143(2) was issued within the prescribed time before the search. The High Court observed that both the CIT(A) and the ITAT had recorded a concurrent finding of fact that, apart from the retracted statement, no other evidence or material was relied upon by the AO, and crucially, that no incriminating material was found during the search relevant to the addition made for this completed year.
The Court found that the finding of fact by the lower authorities regarding the absence of incriminating material was not liable to be interfered with in appeal. The High Court's jurisdiction is limited to substantial questions of law, and a finding of fact, unless perverse, does not raise a substantial question of law.
Accordingly, the Gauhati High Court concluded that the appeal did not involve any substantial question of law and was, therefore, devoid of merit.
The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the ITAT and CIT(A) that the addition made for the completed assessment year under Section 153A, without the support of incriminating material found during the search, was invalid.
The judgment reinforces the critical requirement of finding incriminating material during a search for disturbing completed assessments within the six-year block period under Section 153A, aligning with the settled position of law laid down by the Supreme Court.
#IncomeTax #Section153A #TaxLaw #GauhatiHighCourt
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Belated Challenge by Non-Bidders to GeM Tender Conditions for School Sports Equipment Not Maintainable: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Political Rivalry Doesn't Warrant Custodial Arrest in Forgery Case: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Citing Article 21
01 May 2026
Wife Can't Seek Husband's Income Tax Details via RTI for Maintenance Claims: Delhi High Court
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.