Parliamentary Privilege
Subject : Legal - Constitutional Law
No Immunity for Bribe-Taking MPs, MLAs: Supreme Court Overrules 1998 Narsimha Rao Judgment
The Supreme Court on March 4 ruled that members of parliament and state assemblies are not immune from prosecution in bribery cases, overruling a 1998 judgment that had granted them immunity.
The 1998 verdict, known as the PV Narasimha Rao judgment, had held that lawmakers had immunity under the Constitution against criminal prosecution for any speech made and vote cast inside the House.
However, the seven-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that the 1998 judgment was contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution, which deal with the powers and privileges of MPs and MLAs.
“Bribery is not protected by parliamentary privileges and the interpretation of the 1998 verdict is contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution,” the court said.
The court noted that corruption and bribery are destructive of the aspirations and deliberative ideals of the Constitution.
“Elections to Rajya Sabha or to the office of the President/Vice President will also come under the ambit of Constitutional provisions applicable to parliamentary privilege,” the Supreme Court said.
The court’s ruling came in response to a petition filed by former Jharkhand MLA Sita Soren, who was accused of taking a bribe to cast a vote in a Rajya Sabha election.
The court said that the offence of bribery is agnostic to the performance of the agreed action and crystallized on the exchange of illegal gratification.
“It does not matter whether the vote is cast in the agreed direction or if the vote is cast at all. The offence of bribery is complete at that point in time,” the court clarified.
The court’s ruling is a significant blow to the immunity enjoyed by MPs and MLAs, and is likely to have a major impact on the way corruption cases are prosecuted in India.
Keywords:
Bribery - Parliamentary privilege - Supreme Court - Corruption - Immunity - Constitution - Articles 105 and 194 - Rajya Sabha - President - Vice President - Sita Soren - Jharkhand - Illegal gratification
#Bribery #ParliamentaryPrivilege #SupremeCourt
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.