Parliamentary Privilege
Subject : Legal - Constitutional Law
No Immunity for Bribe-Taking MPs, MLAs: Supreme Court Overrules 1998 Narsimha Rao Judgment
The Supreme Court on March 4 ruled that members of parliament and state assemblies are not immune from prosecution in bribery cases, overruling a 1998 judgment that had granted them immunity.
The 1998 verdict, known as the PV Narasimha Rao judgment, had held that lawmakers had immunity under the Constitution against criminal prosecution for any speech made and vote cast inside the House.
However, the seven-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that the 1998 judgment was contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution, which deal with the powers and privileges of MPs and MLAs.
“Bribery is not protected by parliamentary privileges and the interpretation of the 1998 verdict is contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution,” the court said.
The court noted that corruption and bribery are destructive of the aspirations and deliberative ideals of the Constitution.
“Elections to Rajya Sabha or to the office of the President/Vice President will also come under the ambit of Constitutional provisions applicable to parliamentary privilege,” the Supreme Court said.
The court’s ruling came in response to a petition filed by former Jharkhand MLA Sita Soren, who was accused of taking a bribe to cast a vote in a Rajya Sabha election.
The court said that the offence of bribery is agnostic to the performance of the agreed action and crystallized on the exchange of illegal gratification.
“It does not matter whether the vote is cast in the agreed direction or if the vote is cast at all. The offence of bribery is complete at that point in time,” the court clarified.
The court’s ruling is a significant blow to the immunity enjoyed by MPs and MLAs, and is likely to have a major impact on the way corruption cases are prosecuted in India.
Keywords:
Bribery - Parliamentary privilege - Supreme Court - Corruption - Immunity - Constitution - Articles 105 and 194 - Rajya Sabha - President - Vice President - Sita Soren - Jharkhand - Illegal gratification
#Bribery #ParliamentaryPrivilege #SupremeCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.