Parliamentary Privilege
Subject : Legal - Constitutional Law
No Immunity for Bribe-Taking MPs, MLAs: Supreme Court Overrules 1998 Narsimha Rao Judgment
The Supreme Court on March 4 ruled that members of parliament and state assemblies are not immune from prosecution in bribery cases, overruling a 1998 judgment that had granted them immunity.
The 1998 verdict, known as the PV Narasimha Rao judgment, had held that lawmakers had immunity under the Constitution against criminal prosecution for any speech made and vote cast inside the House.
However, the seven-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said that the 1998 judgment was contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution, which deal with the powers and privileges of MPs and MLAs.
“Bribery is not protected by parliamentary privileges and the interpretation of the 1998 verdict is contrary to Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution,” the court said.
The court noted that corruption and bribery are destructive of the aspirations and deliberative ideals of the Constitution.
“Elections to Rajya Sabha or to the office of the President/Vice President will also come under the ambit of Constitutional provisions applicable to parliamentary privilege,” the Supreme Court said.
The court’s ruling came in response to a petition filed by former Jharkhand MLA Sita Soren, who was accused of taking a bribe to cast a vote in a Rajya Sabha election.
The court said that the offence of bribery is agnostic to the performance of the agreed action and crystallized on the exchange of illegal gratification.
“It does not matter whether the vote is cast in the agreed direction or if the vote is cast at all. The offence of bribery is complete at that point in time,” the court clarified.
The court’s ruling is a significant blow to the immunity enjoyed by MPs and MLAs, and is likely to have a major impact on the way corruption cases are prosecuted in India.
Keywords:
Bribery - Parliamentary privilege - Supreme Court - Corruption - Immunity - Constitution - Articles 105 and 194 - Rajya Sabha - President - Vice President - Sita Soren - Jharkhand - Illegal gratification
#Bribery #ParliamentaryPrivilege #SupremeCourt
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.